• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生干预措施的评估:理论的应用。

The appraisal of public health interventions: the use of theory.

作者信息

Threlfall Anthony G, Meah Soraya, Fischer Alastair J, Cookson Richard, Rutter Harry, Kelly Michael P

机构信息

Theorize Ltd, Manchester, UK.

Independent Researcher, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Mar;37(1):166-71. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu044. Epub 2014 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdu044
PMID:25015579
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public health decision-making is hampered by inappropriate adherence to underpowered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which give inconclusive results and lead to decision-makers being loath to recommend interventions with strong theoretical and observational support.

METHODS

We outline situations in which robust decisions about health interventions can be made without trial evidence. We present a new approach in which theory, causal models and past observations are given proper regard in the decision-making process.

RESULTS

Using our approach, we provide examples where the use of causal theories and observations in areas, such as salt reduction, smoking cessation and gardening to improve mental health, is sufficient for deciding that such interventions are effective for improving health without needing the support of underpowered RCTs. Particularly where RCT evidence is inconclusive, our approach may provide similar aggregate health outcomes for society for vastly lower cost.

CONCLUSIONS

When knowledge and theoretical understanding are unable sufficiently to reduce doubt about the direction of effect from an intervention, decisions should be made using evidence-based medicine approaches. There are, however, many cases where the combination of robust theory, causal understanding and observation are able to provide sufficient evidence of the direction of effect from an intervention that current practice should be altered.

摘要

背景

公共卫生决策受到阻碍,因为人们不恰当地依赖效力不足的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验结果不明确,导致决策者不愿推荐那些有强有力理论和观察支持的干预措施。

方法

我们概述了在没有试验证据的情况下也能对健康干预措施做出可靠决策的情形。我们提出了一种新方法,即在决策过程中要适当考虑理论、因果模型和过去的观察结果。

结果

运用我们的方法,我们给出了一些例子,比如在减盐、戒烟以及园艺改善心理健康等领域,使用因果理论和观察结果足以判定这些干预措施对改善健康有效,而无需效力不足的随机对照试验的支持。特别是在随机对照试验证据不明确的情况下,我们的方法可能以低得多的成本为社会带来类似的总体健康效益。

结论

当知识和理论理解不足以充分减少对干预效果方向的疑虑时,应采用循证医学方法做出决策。然而,在许多情况下,强有力的理论、因果理解和观察结果相结合能够提供足够的证据证明干预效果的方向,此时就应该改变当前的做法。

相似文献

1
The appraisal of public health interventions: the use of theory.公共卫生干预措施的评估:理论的应用。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Mar;37(1):166-71. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu044. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
2
The appraisal of public health interventions: an overview.公共卫生干预措施的评价:概述。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Dec;35(4):488-94. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt076. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review.预防工作场所事故的安全干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 1;18(2):e1234. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1234. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity.改善针对烟草、酒精、饮食、身体活动和肥胖的工作场所政策或措施实施情况的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD012439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012439.pub2.
7
Tools to support evidence-informed public health decision making.支持循证公共卫生决策的工具。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 18;14:728. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-728.
8
An exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial of knowledge translation strategies to support evidence-informed decision-making in local governments (The KT4LG study).探索性聚类随机对照试验,以知识转化策略支持地方政府的循证决策(KT4LG 研究)。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 13;11:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-34.
9
Complexity and indeterminism of evidence-based public health: an analytical framework.循证公共卫生的复杂性与不确定性:一个分析框架
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Aug;17(3):459-65. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9554-0.
10
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidimensional perspectives of geo-epidemiology: from interdisciplinary learning and research to cost-benefit oriented decision-making.地理流行病学的多维视角:从跨学科学习与研究到以成本效益为导向的决策制定
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 30;12:1492426. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1492426. eCollection 2024.
2
Medication Review: What's in a Name and What Is It about?药物审查:名称里有什么以及它是关于什么的?
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Feb 19;12(1):39. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12010039.
3
Greater agreement is required to harness the potential of health intelligence: a critical interpretive synthesis.
要充分发挥健康情报的潜力,需要达成更多共识:一项关键的阐释性综合研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Nov;163:37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.09.007. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
4
Bayesian multistate modelling of incomplete chronic disease burden data.不完全慢性病负担数据的贝叶斯多状态建模
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2023 Jan;186(1):1-19. doi: 10.1093/jrsssa/qnac015. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
5
Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group.在公共卫生指南和系统评价中应用 GRADE 方法的挑战:来自 GRADE 公共卫生组的概念文章。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
Evaluation of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol: A Mixed Method Natural Experiment in Scotland.评估酒精最低单位定价:苏格兰混合方法自然实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 13;17(10):3394. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103394.
7
Analysing synthesis of evidence in a systematic review in health professions education: observations on struggling beyond Kirkpatrick.系统综述中健康职业教育证据综合分析:超越柯克帕特里克的努力观察。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1731278. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1731278.
8
Using natural experimental studies to guide public health action: turning the evidence-based medicine paradigm on its head.利用自然实验研究指导公共卫生行动:颠覆循证医学范式。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Feb;74(2):203-208. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213085. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
9
Use of progression criteria to support monitoring and commissioning decision making of public health services: lessons from Better Start Bradford.使用进展标准来支持公共卫生服务的监测和委托决策:来自布拉德福德更优开端的经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 27;19(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7149-7.
10
Using flawed, uncertain, proximate and sparse (FUPS) data in the context of complexity: learning from the case of child mental health.在复杂性的背景下使用有缺陷、不确定、间接和稀疏(FUPS)的数据:从儿童心理健康案例中学习。
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 13;16(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1079-6.