• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在公共卫生指南和系统评价中应用 GRADE 方法的挑战:来自 GRADE 公共卫生组的概念文章。

Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group.

机构信息

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley Street, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G3 7HR, UK.

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley Street, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G3 7HR, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001
PMID:33476768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8352629/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This article explores the need for conceptual advances and practical guidance in the application of the GRADE approach within public health contexts.

METHODS

We convened an expert workshop and conducted a scoping review to identify challenges experienced by GRADE users in public health contexts. We developed this concept article through thematic analysis and an iterative process of consultation and discussion conducted with members electronically and at three GRADE Working Group meetings.

RESULTS

Five priority issues can pose challenges for public health guideline developers and systematic reviewers when applying GRADE: (1) incorporating the perspectives of diverse stakeholders; (2) selecting and prioritizing health and "nonhealth" outcomes; (3) interpreting outcomes and identifying a threshold for decision-making; (4) assessing certainty of evidence from diverse sources, including nonrandomized studies; and (5) addressing implications for decision makers, including concerns about conditional recommendations. We illustrate these challenges with examples from public health guidelines and systematic reviews, identifying gaps where conceptual advances may facilitate the consistent application or further development of the methodology and provide solutions.

CONCLUSION

The GRADE Public Health Group will respond to these challenges with solutions that are coherent with existing guidance and can be consistently implemented across public health decision-making contexts.

摘要

背景与目的

本文探讨了在公共卫生领域应用 GRADE 方法时,在概念上的推进和实践指导方面的必要性。

方法

我们召开了一次专家研讨会,并进行了范围综述,以确定 GRADE 用户在公共卫生领域应用中遇到的挑战。我们通过主题分析以及与电子和三次 GRADE 工作组会议中的成员进行的磋商和讨论的迭代过程,制定了这篇概念文章。

结果

在应用 GRADE 时,有五个优先问题可能会给公共卫生指南制定者和系统评价者带来挑战:(1)纳入不同利益相关者的观点;(2)选择和优先考虑健康和“非健康”结果;(3)解释结果并确定决策的阈值;(4)评估来自不同来源(包括非随机研究)的证据的确定性;(5)针对决策者的影响,包括对有条件建议的担忧。我们通过公共卫生指南和系统评价中的示例说明了这些挑战,确定了在哪些方面可以通过概念上的推进来促进方法的一致应用或进一步发展,并提供了解决方案。

结论

GRADE 公共卫生小组将针对这些挑战提出解决方案,这些解决方案与现有指南一致,并可在公共卫生决策背景下一致实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff72/8352629/409f31eed567/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff72/8352629/409f31eed567/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff72/8352629/409f31eed567/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group.在公共卫生指南和系统评价中应用 GRADE 方法的挑战:来自 GRADE 公共卫生组的概念文章。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.GRADE 指南 30:建模证据确定性评估的 GRADE 方法——在卫生决策背景下的概述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:138-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
4
GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence.网状meta 分析中评估一致性的 GRADE 方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.025. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
5
The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions.卫生系统和公共卫生决策中的 GRADE 证据决策(EtD)框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 29;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0320-2.
6
GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings.GRADE 指南 32:GRADE 提供了关于选择 GRADE 证据确定性评级目标的指导。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:163-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.026. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
7
Addressing Challenges When Applying GRADE to Public Health Guidelines: A Scoping Review Protocol and Pilot Analysis.应用 GRADE 方法于公共卫生指南时的挑战:范围综述方案和初步分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 16;19(2):992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020992.
8
GRADE guidance 39: using GRADE-ADOLOPMENT to adopt, adapt or create contextualized recommendations from source guidelines and evidence syntheses.等级指导 39:使用 GRADE-ADOLOPMENT 来采用、改编或创建源自指南和证据综合的具有背景针对性的推荐意见。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;174:111494. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111494. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
9
Evidence to Decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations.证据决策框架为制定 GRADE 指南建议提供了结构化的“路线图”。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;104:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
10
GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.GRADE 指南:18. ROBINS-I 及其他评估非随机研究偏倚风险的工具应如何用于评估证据体的确定性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Global variation in antibiotic prescribing guidelines and the implications for decreasing AMR in the future.抗生素处方指南的全球差异及其对未来降低抗菌药物耐药性的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 7;16:1600787. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1600787. eCollection 2025.
2
The Canadian Society of Nephrology Methods for Developing and Adapting Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Update.加拿大肾脏病学会制定和调整临床实践指南的方法:最新版
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 Jun 30;12:20543581251346074. doi: 10.1177/20543581251346074. eCollection 2025.
3
Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempts, and Suicide Mortality in Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews with Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines.乳腺癌筛查与诊断:欧洲乳腺指南概要。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):46-56. doi: 10.7326/M19-2125. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
2
The Sustainable Development Goals: an agenda for us all.可持续发展目标:我们所有人的议程。
Perspect Public Health. 2019 Sep;139(5):224-225. doi: 10.1177/1757913919865452.
3
Larviciding to prevent malaria transmission.杀灭幼虫以预防疟疾传播。
癌症患者的自杀意念、自杀未遂及自杀死亡率:一项荟萃分析系统评价概述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 27;17(11):1788. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111788.
4
Prevention of Obesity among Adults: Evidence- and Consensus-Based Guideline.成人肥胖预防:基于证据和共识的指南。
Obes Facts. 2025 May 22:1-19. doi: 10.1159/000546415.
5
A methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney function.一种用于确定肾功能减退患者抗癌药物给药建议的方法。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Mar 25;82:103101. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103101. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Using natural experiments to evaluate population health and health system interventions: new framework for producers and users of evidence.利用自然实验评估人群健康与卫生系统干预措施:证据生产者和使用者的新框架
BMJ. 2025 Mar 28;388:e080505. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080505.
7
Global prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective evidence.新冠后状况的全球患病率:前瞻性证据的系统评价与荟萃分析
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2025 Mar;45(3):112-138. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.45.3.02.
8
CYP2D6 genotype and associated 5-HT receptor antagonist outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.CYP2D6基因分型与5-羟色胺受体拮抗剂相关结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb;18(2):e70108. doi: 10.1111/cts.70108.
9
Nutrition users' guides: systematic reviews part 1 -structured guide for methodological assessment, interpretation and application of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of non-randomised nutritional epidemiology studies.营养用户指南:系统评价 第1部分——非随机营养流行病学研究系统评价和荟萃分析方法学评估、解读及应用的结构化指南
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2024 Aug 28;7(2):e000835. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000835. eCollection 2024.
10
Population dynamics and digitalization: implications for COVID-19 data sources in South Africa-a scoping review.人口动态与数字化:对南非新冠疫情数据来源的影响——一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 15;12:1537057. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1537057. eCollection 2024.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 14;8(8):CD012736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012736.pub2.
4
Methods for Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines: Recommendations in the Era of Guideline Transparency.欧盟委员会乳腺癌指南倡议的制定方法:指南透明时代的建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 20;171(4):273-280. doi: 10.7326/M18-3445. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.减少含糖饮料消费的环境干预措施及其对健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012292.pub2.
6
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide-treated nets.在使用经杀虫剂处理蚊帐的社区中,通过室内滞留喷洒预防疟疾。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 23;5(5):CD012688. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012688.pub2.
7
Interventions to reduce ambient particulate matter air pollution and their effect on health.减少环境细颗粒物空气污染的干预措施及其对健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;5(5):CD010919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010919.pub2.
8
Effects of non-health-targeted policies on migrant health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非健康目标政策对流动人口健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Apr;7(4):e420-e435. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30560-6. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
9
Considerations of complexity in rating certainty of evidence in systematic reviews: a primer on using the GRADE approach in global health.系统评价中证据确定性评级的复杂性考量:全球卫生领域使用GRADE方法入门指南
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000848. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000848. eCollection 2019.
10
The WHO-INTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective.世界卫生组织-整合证据到决策框架第1.0版:整合世界卫生组织的规范和价值观以及复杂性视角。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000844. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000844. eCollection 2019.