MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley Street, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G3 7HR, UK.
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley Street, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G3 7HR, UK.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
This article explores the need for conceptual advances and practical guidance in the application of the GRADE approach within public health contexts.
We convened an expert workshop and conducted a scoping review to identify challenges experienced by GRADE users in public health contexts. We developed this concept article through thematic analysis and an iterative process of consultation and discussion conducted with members electronically and at three GRADE Working Group meetings.
Five priority issues can pose challenges for public health guideline developers and systematic reviewers when applying GRADE: (1) incorporating the perspectives of diverse stakeholders; (2) selecting and prioritizing health and "nonhealth" outcomes; (3) interpreting outcomes and identifying a threshold for decision-making; (4) assessing certainty of evidence from diverse sources, including nonrandomized studies; and (5) addressing implications for decision makers, including concerns about conditional recommendations. We illustrate these challenges with examples from public health guidelines and systematic reviews, identifying gaps where conceptual advances may facilitate the consistent application or further development of the methodology and provide solutions.
The GRADE Public Health Group will respond to these challenges with solutions that are coherent with existing guidance and can be consistently implemented across public health decision-making contexts.
本文探讨了在公共卫生领域应用 GRADE 方法时,在概念上的推进和实践指导方面的必要性。
我们召开了一次专家研讨会,并进行了范围综述,以确定 GRADE 用户在公共卫生领域应用中遇到的挑战。我们通过主题分析以及与电子和三次 GRADE 工作组会议中的成员进行的磋商和讨论的迭代过程,制定了这篇概念文章。
在应用 GRADE 时,有五个优先问题可能会给公共卫生指南制定者和系统评价者带来挑战:(1)纳入不同利益相关者的观点;(2)选择和优先考虑健康和“非健康”结果;(3)解释结果并确定决策的阈值;(4)评估来自不同来源(包括非随机研究)的证据的确定性;(5)针对决策者的影响,包括对有条件建议的担忧。我们通过公共卫生指南和系统评价中的示例说明了这些挑战,确定了在哪些方面可以通过概念上的推进来促进方法的一致应用或进一步发展,并提供了解决方案。
GRADE 公共卫生小组将针对这些挑战提出解决方案,这些解决方案与现有指南一致,并可在公共卫生决策背景下一致实施。