• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大肠杆菌O157:H7在抵抗原生动物捕食及在土壤中生存方面的适应性菌株差异。

Strain differences in fitness of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to resist protozoan predation and survival in soil.

作者信息

Ravva Subbarao V, Sarreal Chester Z, Mandrell Robert E

机构信息

Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Western Regional Research Center, Albany, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 14;9(7):e102412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102412. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0102412
PMID:25019377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4097067/
Abstract

Escherichia coli O157:H7 (EcO157) associated with the 2006 spinach outbreak appears to have persisted as the organism was isolated, three months after the outbreak, from environmental samples in the produce production areas of the central coast of California. Survival in harsh environments may be linked to the inherent fitness characteristics of EcO157. This study evaluated the comparative fitness of outbreak-related clinical and environmental strains to resist protozoan predation and survive in soil from a spinach field in the general vicinity of isolation of strains genetically indistinguishable from the 2006 outbreak strains. Environmental strains from soil and feral pig feces survived longer (11 to 35 days for 90% decreases, D-value) with Vorticella microstoma and Colpoda aspera, isolated previously from dairy wastewater; these D-values correlated (P<0.05) negatively with protozoan growth. Similarly, strains from cow feces, feral pig feces, and bagged spinach survived significantly longer in soil compared to clinical isolates indistinguishable by 11-loci multi-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis. The curli-positive (C+) phenotype, a fitness trait linked with attachment in ruminant and human gut, decreased after exposure to protozoa, and in soils only C- cells remained after 7 days. The C+ phenotype correlated negatively with D-values of EcO157 exposed to soil (rs = -0.683; P = 0.036), Vorticella (rs = -0.465; P = 0.05) or Colpoda (rs = -0.750; P = 0.0001). In contrast, protozoan growth correlated positively with C+ phenotype (Vorticella, rs = 0.730, P = 0.0004; Colpoda, rs = 0.625, P = 0.006) suggesting a preference for consumption of C+ cells, although they grew on C- strains also. We speculate that the C- phenotype is a selective trait for survival and possibly transport of the pathogen in soil and water environments.

摘要

与2006年菠菜疫情相关的大肠杆菌O157:H7(EcO157)似乎一直存在,因为在疫情爆发三个月后,从加利福尼亚州中部海岸农产品生产区的环境样本中分离出了这种微生物。在恶劣环境中的存活可能与EcO157的固有适应性特征有关。本研究评估了与疫情相关的临床菌株和环境菌株在抵抗原生动物捕食以及在与2006年疫情菌株基因无法区分的菌株分离地附近的菠菜田土壤中存活的相对适应性。从土壤和野猪粪便中分离出的环境菌株在与先前从乳品废水中分离出的小口钟虫和粗颈肾形虫共同培养时存活时间更长(90%数量减少时的D值为11至35天);这些D值与原生动物生长呈负相关(P<0.05)。同样,通过11个位点的多位点可变数目串联重复分析无法区分的情况下,来自牛粪、野猪粪便和袋装菠菜的菌株在土壤中的存活时间明显长于临床分离株。卷曲蛋白阳性(C+)表型是一种与在反刍动物和人类肠道中附着有关的适应性特征,在接触原生动物后会减少,并且在土壤中7天后仅剩下C-细胞。C+表型与暴露于土壤(rs = -0.683;P = 0.036)、钟虫(rs = -0.465;P = 0.05)或肾形虫(rs = -0.750;P = 0.0001)的EcO157的D值呈负相关。相反,原生动物生长与C+表型呈正相关(钟虫,rs = 0.730,P = 0.0004;肾形虫,rs = 0.625,P = 0.006),这表明原生动物更倾向于消耗C+细胞,尽管它们也能在C-菌株上生长。我们推测C-表型是病原体在土壤和水环境中存活以及可能传播的一个选择性特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84be/4097067/a5d8cda373ff/pone.0102412.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84be/4097067/a5d8cda373ff/pone.0102412.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84be/4097067/a5d8cda373ff/pone.0102412.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Strain differences in fitness of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to resist protozoan predation and survival in soil.大肠杆菌O157:H7在抵抗原生动物捕食及在土壤中生存方面的适应性菌株差异。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 14;9(7):e102412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102412. eCollection 2014.
2
Expression of Curli by O157:H7 Strains Isolated from Patients during Outbreaks Is Different from Similar Strains Isolated from Leafy Green Production Environments.在疫情期间从患者身上分离出的O157:H7菌株中卷曲菌毛的表达与从绿叶蔬菜生产环境中分离出的类似菌株不同。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016 Dec 20;6:189. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00189. eCollection 2016.
3
Distinct transcriptional profiles and phenotypes exhibited by Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates related to the 2006 spinach-associated outbreak.与 2006 年菠菜相关暴发有关的大肠杆菌 O157:H7 分离株表现出不同的转录谱和表型。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jan;78(2):455-63. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06251-11. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
4
Identification of protozoa in dairy lagoon wastewater that consume Escherichia coli O157:H7 preferentially.鉴定优先消耗大肠杆菌 O157:H7 的乳清废水原生动物。
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 20;5(12):e15671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015671.
5
Escherichia coli O157:H7 in feral swine near spinach fields and cattle, central California coast.加利福尼亚州中部海岸菠菜田和牛附近野猪体内的大肠杆菌O157:H7
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Dec;13(12):1908-11. doi: 10.3201/eid1312.070763.
6
Altered protozoan and bacterial communities and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in monensin-treated wastewater from a dairy lagoon.在来自奶牛场的沼气池废水用莫能菌素处理后,原生动物和细菌群落的改变和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 的存活情况。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054782. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
7
Role of curli and cellulose expression in adherence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to spinach leaves.卷曲菌毛和纤维素表达在大肠杆菌 O157:H7 黏附菠菜叶中的作用。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012 Feb;9(2):160-7. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2011.1020.
8
Persistence of enterohaemorrhagic and nonpathogenic E. coli on spinach leaves and in rhizosphere soil.肠出血性和非致病性大肠杆菌在菠菜叶和根际土壤中的持久性。
J Appl Microbiol. 2010 May;108(5):1789-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04583.x. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
9
Role of curli and plant cultivation conditions on Escherichia coli O157:H7 internalization into spinach grown on hydroponics and in soil.卷曲菌和植物培养条件对水培和土壤中生长的菠菜中大肠杆菌 O157:H7 内化的作用。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Mar 3;173:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
10
Fitness of Outbreak and Environmental Strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Aerosolizable Soil and Association of Clonal Variation in Stress Gene Regulation.气溶胶化土壤中肠出血性大肠杆菌 O157:H7 的暴发和环境菌株的适应性及其应激基因调控的克隆变异的关联。
Pathogens. 2014 Jun 30;3(3):528-48. doi: 10.3390/pathogens3030528.

引用本文的文献

1
Strains Display Varying Susceptibility to Grazing by the Soil Amoeba .菌株对土壤变形虫的啃食表现出不同的敏感性。
Microorganisms. 2023 May 31;11(6):1457. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061457.
2
Nitrate enrichment does not affect enteropathogenic in aquatic microcosms but may affect other strains present in aquatic habitats.硝酸盐富集不会影响水生微宇宙中的 ,但可能会影响水生栖息地中存在的其他菌株。
PeerJ. 2022 Sep 27;10:e13914. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13914. eCollection 2022.
3
Persistence and Decay of Fecal Microbiota in Aquatic Habitats.

本文引用的文献

1
Altered protozoan and bacterial communities and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in monensin-treated wastewater from a dairy lagoon.在来自奶牛场的沼气池废水用莫能菌素处理后,原生动物和细菌群落的改变和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 的存活情况。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054782. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
2
Influence of the plant defense response to Escherichia coli O157:H7 cell surface structures on survival of that enteric pathogen on plant surfaces.植物防御反应对大肠杆菌 O157:H7 细胞表面结构的影响及其对该肠道病原体在植物表面存活的影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Aug;78(16):5882-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01095-12. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
3
粪便微生物在水生栖息地中的持久性和衰减。
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2019 Oct 2;83(4). doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00005-19. Print 2019 Nov 20.
4
Absence of Curli in Soil-Persistent Is Mediated by a C-di-GMP Signaling Defect and Suggests Evidence of Biofilm-Independent Niche Specialization.土壤持久性菌株中卷曲菌毛的缺失由C-二鸟苷单磷酸信号缺陷介导,并提示了不依赖生物膜的生态位特化的证据。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 22;9:1340. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01340. eCollection 2018.
5
Expression of Curli by O157:H7 Strains Isolated from Patients during Outbreaks Is Different from Similar Strains Isolated from Leafy Green Production Environments.在疫情期间从患者身上分离出的O157:H7菌株中卷曲菌毛的表达与从绿叶蔬菜生产环境中分离出的类似菌株不同。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016 Dec 20;6:189. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00189. eCollection 2016.
6
Biofilm formation protects Escherichia coli against killing by Caenorhabditis elegans and Myxococcus xanthus.生物膜的形成保护大肠杆菌免受秀丽隐杆线虫和黄色粘球菌的杀灭。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Nov;80(22):7079-87. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02464-14. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
Distinct acid resistance and survival fitness displayed by Curli variants of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7.
肠出血性大肠杆菌 O157:H7 的卷曲菌变体表现出不同的耐酸性和生存适应能力。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jun;77(11):3685-95. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02315-10. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
4
Determination of adhesin gene sequences in, and biofilm formation by, O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from different sources.从不同来源分离的 O157 和非 O157 产志贺毒素大肠杆菌菌株中黏附素基因序列的测定和生物膜形成。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Apr;77(7):2201-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01920-10. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
5
Comparative die-off of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and fecal indicator bacteria in pond water.池塘水中大肠杆菌 O157:H7 和粪便指示菌的比较消亡。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Mar 1;45(5):1853-8. doi: 10.1021/es1032019. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
6
Identification of protozoa in dairy lagoon wastewater that consume Escherichia coli O157:H7 preferentially.鉴定优先消耗大肠杆菌 O157:H7 的乳清废水原生动物。
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 20;5(12):e15671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015671.
7
Effects of environmental stress on stability of tandem repeats in Escherichia coli O157:H7.环境应激对大肠杆菌 O157:H7 串联重复稳定性的影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 May;76(10):3398-400. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02373-09. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
8
Strain-dependent variability in growth and survival of Escherichia coli in agricultural soil.大肠杆菌在农业土壤中生长和存活的应变依赖性变化。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003 Jun 1;44(3):303-8. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00055-2.
9
Adaptation of Pathogenic E. coli to Various Niches: Genome Flexibility is the Key.致病性大肠杆菌对不同生态位的适应:基因组灵活性是关键。
Genome Dyn. 2009;6:110-125. doi: 10.1159/000235766. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
10
Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains isolated from environmental sources differ significantly in acetic acid resistance compared with human outbreak strains.从环境源分离出的大肠杆菌O157:H7菌株与人类暴发菌株相比,在耐乙酸性方面存在显著差异。
J Food Prot. 2009 Mar;72(3):503-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-72.3.503.