Revankar Nikhil, Ward Alexandra J, Pelligra Christopher G, Kongnakorn Thitima, Fan Weihong, LaPensee Kenneth T
Evidera , London , UK.
J Med Econ. 2014 Oct;17(10):730-40. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.941065. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
The economic implications from the US Medicare perspective of adopting alternative treatment strategies for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are substantial. The objective of this study is to describe a modeling framework that explores the impact of decisions related to both the location of care and switching to different antibiotics at discharge.
A discrete event simulation (DES) was developed to model the treatment pathway of each patient through various locations (emergency department [ED], inpatient, and outpatient) and the treatments prescribed (empiric antibiotic, switching to a different antibiotic at discharge, or a second antibiotic). Costs are reported in 2012 USD.
The mean number of days on antibiotic in a cohort assigned to a full course of vancomycin was 11.2 days, with 64% of the treatment course being administered in the outpatient setting. Mean total costs per patient were $8671, with inpatient care accounting for 58% of the costs accrued. The majority of outpatient costs were associated with parenteral administration rather than drug acquisition or monitoring. Scenarios modifying the treatment pathway to increase the proportion of patients receiving the first dose in the ED, and then managing them in the outpatient setting or prescribing an oral antibiotic at discharge to avoid the cost associated with administering parenteral therapy, therefore have a major impact and lower the typical cost per patient by 11-20%. Since vancomycin is commonly used as empiric therapy in clinical practice, based on these analyses, a shift in treatment practice could result in substantial savings from the Medicare perspective.
The choice of antibiotic and location of care influence the costs and resource use associated with the management of ABSSSIs. The DES framework presented here can provide insight into the potential economic implications of decisions that modify the treatment pathway.
从美国医疗保险的角度来看,采用替代治疗策略治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)具有重大的经济意义。本研究的目的是描述一个建模框架,该框架探讨与护理地点以及出院时更换不同抗生素相关的决策的影响。
开发了一种离散事件模拟(DES)来模拟每位患者在不同地点(急诊科[ED]、住院部和门诊部)的治疗路径以及所开的治疗方案(经验性抗生素、出院时更换为不同抗生素或第二种抗生素)。成本以2012年美元报告。
接受万古霉素全程治疗的队列中,抗生素使用的平均天数为11.2天,其中64%的治疗过程在门诊进行。每位患者的平均总成本为8671美元,住院护理占累计成本的58%。大多数门诊成本与胃肠外给药相关,而非药物采购或监测。修改治疗路径以增加在急诊科接受首剂治疗的患者比例,然后在门诊进行管理或在出院时开具口服抗生素以避免胃肠外治疗相关成本的方案,因此具有重大影响,可使每位患者的典型成本降低11 - 20%。由于万古霉素在临床实践中常用作经验性治疗,基于这些分析,从医疗保险的角度来看,治疗实践的转变可能会带来大量节省。
抗生素的选择和护理地点会影响与ABSSSI管理相关的成本和资源使用。这里介绍的DES框架可以深入了解修改治疗路径的决策可能产生的经济影响。