Kraaij Gert, Zadpoor Amir A, Tuijthof Gabrielle J M, Dankelman Jenny, Nelissen Rob G H H, Valstar Edward R
Biomechanics and Imaging Group, Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden 2300RC, The Netherlands; Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, Delft 2628CD, The Netherlands.
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, Delft 2628CD, The Netherlands.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Oct;38:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
The main cause of failure in total hip replacement is aseptic loosening which is associated with the formation of a periprosthetic fibrous (interface) tissue. Despite important applications for finite element modeling of loose implants, the mechanical properties of the bone-implant interface tissue have never been measured in humans. In this study, we performed unconfined compression tests to characterize the mechanical properties of the interface tissue and to determine the parameters of various hyperelastic material models which were fitted to the measurements. Human interface tissues were retrieved during 21 elective revision surgeries from aseptically loosened cemented (N=10) and uncemented hip implants (N=11). Specimens were tested at a fixed deformation rate of 0.1mm/min up to a maximum force of 10N. Elastic moduli for low and high strain regions of the stress-strain curves were determined. Interface tissue from aseptically loose cemented prostheses shows higher elastic moduli (mean=1.85MPa, 95% C.I.=1.76-1.95MPa) in the high strain region as compared to that of the interface tissue from the cementless group (mean=1.65MPa, 95% C.I.=1.43-1.88MPa). The 5-terms Mooney-Rivlin model ( [Formula: see text] ) described the stress-strain behavior the best. Large variations in the mechanical behavior were observed both between specimens from the same patient as between those of different patients. The material model parameters were therefore estimated for the mean data as well as for the curves with the highest and lowest strain at the maximum load. The model parameters found for the mean data were C1=-0.0074MPa, C2=0.0019MPa, C3=0MPa, C4=-0.0032MPa and C5=0MPa in the cemented group and C1=-0.0137MPa, C2=0.0069MPa, C3=0.0026MPa, C4=-0.0094MPa and C5=0MPa in the cementless group. The results of this study can be used in finite element computer.
全髋关节置换失败的主要原因是无菌性松动,这与假体周围纤维(界面)组织的形成有关。尽管有限元建模在松动植入物方面有重要应用,但骨-植入物界面组织的力学性能从未在人体中进行过测量。在本研究中,我们进行了无侧限压缩试验,以表征界面组织的力学性能,并确定拟合测量数据的各种超弹性材料模型的参数。在21例择期翻修手术中,从无菌性松动的骨水泥型(N = 10)和非骨水泥型髋关节植入物(N = 11)中获取人体界面组织。标本以0.1mm/min的固定变形速率进行测试,直至最大力达到10N。确定了应力-应变曲线低应变区和高应变区的弹性模量。与非骨水泥组的界面组织(平均值 = 1.65MPa,95%置信区间 = 1.43 - 1.88MPa)相比,无菌性松动的骨水泥型假体的界面组织在高应变区显示出更高的弹性模量(平均值 = 1.85MPa,95%置信区间 = 1.76 - 1.95MPa)。五参数Mooney-Rivlin模型([公式:见正文])对应力-应变行为的描述最佳。在同一患者的标本之间以及不同患者的标本之间,均观察到力学行为的巨大差异。因此,针对平均数据以及最大载荷下应变最高和最低的曲线估计了材料模型参数。在骨水泥组中,平均数据的模型参数为C1 = -0.0074MPa,C2 = 0.0019MPa,C3 = 0MPa,C4 = -0.0032MPa,C5 = 0MPa;在非骨水泥组中为C1 = -0.0137MPa,C2 = 0.0069MPa,C3 = 0.0026MPa,C4 = -0.0094MPa,C5 = 0MPa。本研究结果可用于有限元计算机。