Mahelová M, Růžička F
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2014 Jun;63(2):125-9.
The species Candida dubliniensis shares a wide range of phenotypic characteristics with Candida albicans, the most common yeast species isolated from clinical specimens. This is a considerable complication for the detection and identification of Candida dubliniensis from clinical specimens. The lack of data on the incidence of C. dubliniensis in the Czech Republic was the motivation behind the efforts to detect this pathogen in specimens analyzed at the Institute for Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University and St. Anne's Faculty Hospital in Brno. Another aim was to test the reliability of the culture methods used.
Altogether 2260 yeast isolates initially identified as C. albicans were analysed. To differentiate C. dubliniensis from C. albicans, four phenotypic methods were used: colour-based differentiation on CHROMagar Candida medium, culture on medium with 6.5% of NaCl, growth at 42 °C, and colony characteristics on Staib agar. To verify the results, the Bichro-Dubli Fumouze latex agglutination test and species-specific polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were used.
Using phenotypic methods, latex agglutination, and PCR, 50 (2.2%) strains from the study set were assigned to C. dubliniensis. Most (31) C. dubliniensis isolates were recovered from the respiratory tract and the remaining others were three urine isolates, four stool isolates, one central venous catheter isolate, and one blood isolate. With the exception of colour-based differentiation on CHROMagar Candida medium showing a specificity of 85.5%, all the culture methods used have a high sensitivity and a high specificity.
Identification of C. dubliniensis as C. albicans was confirmed in various clinical specimens, most often from the upper respiratory tract. The colour-based differentiation of C. dubliniensis from C. albicans on chromogenic CHROMagar Candida medium can only be recommended as a screening test for the differentiation of C. dubliniensis from other species of the genus Candida. The remaining three methods are highly reliable. The final identification should be based on a combination of these methods, with the species-specific PCR or latex agglutination test used for verification.
都柏林念珠菌与白色念珠菌具有广泛的表型特征,白色念珠菌是从临床标本中分离出的最常见酵母菌种。这给从临床标本中检测和鉴定都柏林念珠菌带来了相当大的复杂性。捷克共和国缺乏关于都柏林念珠菌发病率的数据,这促使在马萨里克大学医学院微生物研究所和布尔诺圣安妮大学医院分析的标本中检测这种病原体。另一个目的是测试所用培养方法的可靠性。
共分析了2260株最初鉴定为白色念珠菌的酵母分离株。为了区分都柏林念珠菌和白色念珠菌,使用了四种表型方法:在CHROMagar念珠菌培养基上基于颜色的区分、在含6.5%氯化钠的培养基上培养、在42℃下生长以及在Staib琼脂上的菌落特征。为了验证结果,使用了双色-都柏林Fumouze乳胶凝集试验和种特异性聚合酶链反应(PCR)。
使用表型方法、乳胶凝集试验和PCR,研究集中的50株(2.2%)菌株被鉴定为都柏林念珠菌。大多数(31株)都柏林念珠菌分离株从呼吸道中分离得到,其余的是3株尿液分离株、4株粪便分离株、1株中心静脉导管分离株和1株血液分离株。除了在CHROMagar念珠菌培养基上基于颜色的区分显示特异性为85.5%外,所有使用的培养方法都具有高灵敏度和高特异性。
在各种临床标本中,尤其是在上呼吸道标本中,都柏林念珠菌被误鉴定为白色念珠菌的情况得到了证实。在显色CHROMagar念珠菌培养基上基于颜色区分都柏林念珠菌和白色念珠菌,仅推荐作为从念珠菌属其他菌种中区分都柏林念珠菌的筛查试验。其余三种方法高度可靠。最终鉴定应基于这些方法的组合,并使用种特异性PCR或乳胶凝集试验进行验证。