Suppr超能文献

都柏林念珠菌的鉴定方法及其在人类临床样本中的出现情况。

Methods of Candida dubliniensis identification and its occurrence in human clinical material.

作者信息

Mahelová Martina, Růžička Filip

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University and St. Anne's Faculty Hospital, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2017 Sep;62(5):401-408. doi: 10.1007/s12223-017-0510-2. Epub 2017 May 17.

Abstract

Candida dubliniensis was reported as a new species in 1995. This species is often misidentified as Candida albicans. The aims of this work were to determine the occurrence of C. dubliniensis in various clinical materials, to evaluate several ways to identify it and to examine the genetic variability of isolates. Among 7706 isolates originally identified as C. albicans, 237 were identified as C. dubliniensis (3.1%). Most of the C. dubliniensis isolates were obtained from the upper and lower respiratory tract (61.4 and 22.9%). Five phenotypic methods including latex agglutination were used (cultivation on CHROMagar Candida, on Staib agar, at 42 °C and in medium with 6.5% NaCl), but only cultivation on the medium with an increased concentration of NaCl and latex agglutination gave reliable results. Species-specific polymerase chain reaction was used as the confirmation method. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry provided less reliable results. In fact, 78.9% of C. dubliniensis isolates had scores above 1.7. However, the rest of them (21.1%) were also identified as C. dubliniensis even when the scores were lower than 1.7. Divergences among C. dubliniensis strains were evaluated by means of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Eighty-six selected C. dubliniensis isolates showed a 69.6% level of similarity. The results of this study expand the knowledge of the incidence, means of identification and genotypic divergence of C. dubliniensis isolates.

摘要

1995年,都柏林念珠菌被报道为一个新物种。该物种常被误鉴定为白色念珠菌。这项工作的目的是确定都柏林念珠菌在各种临床材料中的出现情况,评估几种鉴定它的方法,并检查分离株的遗传变异性。在最初鉴定为白色念珠菌的7706株分离株中,有237株被鉴定为都柏林念珠菌(3.1%)。大多数都柏林念珠菌分离株来自上呼吸道和下呼吸道(分别为61.4%和22.9%)。使用了包括乳胶凝集试验在内的五种表型方法(在CHROMagar念珠菌培养基、Staib琼脂培养基上培养,在42℃以及在含6.5%氯化钠的培养基中培养),但只有在氯化钠浓度增加的培养基上培养和乳胶凝集试验给出了可靠的结果。使用种特异性聚合酶链反应作为确认方法。基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法给出的结果可靠性较低。事实上,78.9%的都柏林念珠菌分离株得分高于1.7。然而,即使得分低于1.7,其余的分离株(21.1%)也被鉴定为都柏林念珠菌。通过脉冲场凝胶电泳评估都柏林念珠菌菌株之间的差异。86株选定的都柏林念珠菌分离株显示出69.6%的相似性水平。这项研究的结果扩展了对都柏林念珠菌分离株的发病率、鉴定方法和基因型差异的认识。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验