Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Aug;36(4):807-14. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9965-2. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
Transfer of discharge medication related information to community pharmacies could improve continuity of care. This requires for community pharmacies to accurately update their patient records when new information is transferred. An instruction manual that specifies how to document information regarding medication changes and clinical information (i.e. allergies/contraindications) could support community pharmacies.
To explore the effect of instruction manuals sent to community pharmacies on completeness of their patient records.
A before-after study was performed (July 2009-August 2010) in the St Lucas Andreas Hospital, a general teaching hospital in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Patients discharged from the cardiology and respiratory ward were included consecutively. The intervention consisted of a training session for community pharmacies regarding documentation problems and faxing an instruction manual to community pharmacies specifying how to document discharge information in their information system. Usual care consisted of faxing a discharge medication overview to community pharmacies without additional instructions. Two weeks after discharge the medication records of community pharmacies were collected by fax. These were compared with the initial discharge overviews regarding completeness of medication changes (i.e. explicit explanation that medication had been changed) and clinical information documentation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE OUTCOMES: were the number and percentage of completely documented medication changes (either needing to be dispensed or not) and clinical information items. The sample size was calculated at 107 patients per measurement period. Multivariable logistic regression was used for analysis.
Two hundred and eighteen patients (112 before-106 after) were included. Completeness of medication changes documentation increased marginally after the intervention (46.6 vs 56.3 %, adjusted Odds Ratio 1.4 [95 % confidence interval 1.07-1.83]). Documentation increased when medication was actually dispensed by the community pharmacy. No significant improvements were seen for allergy and contraindication documentation.
The intervention is insufficient to increase the completeness of documentation by community pharmacies as marginal improvements were achieved. Future studies should evaluate whether electronic infrastructures may help in achieving updated medication records to improve continuity of pharmaceutical care.
将出院带药相关信息转至社区药房可以提高医疗服务的连续性。这要求社区药房在接收到新信息时准确更新患者的记录。一份说明如何记录药物变化和临床信息(即过敏/禁忌)的指导手册可以为社区药房提供支持。
探索发给社区药房的指导手册对其患者记录完整性的影响。
这是一项在荷兰阿姆斯特丹圣卢卡斯安德烈亚斯医院进行的前后对照研究(2009 年 7 月至 2010 年 8 月)。
连续纳入从心脏科和呼吸科病房出院的患者。干预措施包括为社区药房举办关于记录问题的培训课程,并向社区药房传真一份指导手册,说明如何在其信息系统中记录出院信息。常规护理包括向社区药房传真出院药物概要,没有额外的说明。出院两周后,通过传真收集社区药房的药物记录。将这些记录与初始出院概要进行比较,以评估药物变化(即明确解释药物已改变)和临床信息记录的完整性。
完全记录药物变化(需要或不需要配药)和临床信息项目的数量和百分比。根据测量期内 107 名患者的样本量进行计算。采用多变量逻辑回归进行分析。
共纳入 218 名患者(112 名前测-106 名后测)。干预后,药物变化记录的完整性略有提高(46.6%对 56.3%,调整后的优势比为 1.4 [95%置信区间为 1.07-1.83])。当社区药房实际配发药物时,记录的完整性有所提高。过敏和禁忌记录方面没有显著改善。
该干预措施不足以提高社区药房记录的完整性,仅取得了微小的改善。未来的研究应评估电子基础设施是否有助于更新药物记录,以改善药物治疗的连续性。