Menendez Mariano E, Ring David
Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Yawkey Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Suite 2100, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA,
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3559-66. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3793-5. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
Surgeons commonly arrange for patients to perform autologous blood donation before elective orthopaedic surgery. Understanding sociodemographic patterns of use of autologous blood transfusion can help improve quality of care and cost containment.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to determine whether there were (1) racial disparities, (2) insurance-based disparities, or (3) income-based disparities in autologous blood use. Additionally, we evaluated the combined effect of (4) race and insurance and (5) race and income on autologous blood use, and we compared ratios of autologous with allogeneic blood use.
Of the more than 3,500,000 patients undergoing major elective orthopaedic surgery identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2008 and 2011, 2.4% received autologous blood transfusion and 12% received allogeneic blood transfusion. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the influence of race, insurance status, and income on autologous blood use.
Compared with white patients, Hispanic patients had lower odds of autologous blood use for elective hip (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82) and knee arthroplasties (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67-0.75). Black patients had lower odds of receiving autologous blood transfusion for hip arthroplasty (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.83). Compared with the privately insured, uninsured and publicly insured patients were less likely to receive autologous blood for total joint arthroplasty and spinal fusion. Patients with low and medium income were less likely to have autologous blood transfusion for total joint arthroplasty and spinal fusion compared with high-level income earners. Even at comparable income and insurance levels with whites, Hispanic and black patients tended to be less likely to receive autologous blood transfusion. Ratios of autologous to allogeneic blood use were lower among minority patients.
Historically disadvantaged populations receive fewer autologous blood transfusions for elective orthopaedic surgery. Whether the differential use is attributable to patient preference or unequal access to this practice should be investigated further.
Level II, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
外科医生通常会安排患者在择期骨科手术前进行自体输血。了解自体输血使用的社会人口学模式有助于提高医疗质量和控制成本。
问题/目的:我们试图确定在自体输血使用方面是否存在(1)种族差异、(2)基于保险的差异或(3)基于收入的差异。此外,我们评估了(4)种族与保险以及(5)种族与收入对自体输血使用的综合影响,并比较了自体输血与异体输血的比例。
在2008年至2011年全国住院患者样本中确定的超过350万接受重大择期骨科手术的患者中,2.4%接受了自体输血,12%接受了异体输血。进行多变量逻辑回归以确定种族、保险状况和收入对自体输血使用的影响。
与白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者在择期髋关节置换术(优势比[OR],0.75;95%可信区间[CI],0.69 - 0.82)和膝关节置换术中使用自体输血的几率较低(OR,0.71;95%CI,0.67 - 0.75)。黑人患者在髋关节置换术中接受自体输血的几率较低(OR,0.78;95%CI,0.74 - 0.83)。与私人保险患者相比,未参保和公共保险患者在全关节置换术和脊柱融合术中接受自体输血的可能性较小。与高收入者相比,中低收入患者在全关节置换术和脊柱融合术中进行自体输血的可能性较小。即使在与白人相当的收入和保险水平下,西班牙裔和黑人患者接受自体输血的可能性也往往较小。少数族裔患者的自体输血与异体输血比例较低。
历史上处于劣势的人群在择期骨科手术中接受的自体输血较少。这种差异使用是归因于患者偏好还是获得这种治疗的机会不平等,应进一步研究。
二级,预后研究。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。