Lee Charlotte T, Doran Diane M, Tourangeau Ann E, Fleshner Neil E
Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Dec;18(6):619-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
To evaluate the perceived quality of interactions between nurses and physicians in oncology outpatient clinics.
A cross-sectional, observational survey involving 250 physicians and nurses was conducted at oncology outpatient clinics at two regional cancer centres in the province of Ontario, Canada. Eligible participants were identified by administrators and invited to complete a one-time survey questionnaire. Quality of interactions was assessed using a seven-item survey of relational coordination, which measures two factors of interaction: supportive relationships and quality communication. Descriptive analyses and multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) were conducted to assess potential differences between the two study sites and the two professional groups.
Overall, nurses and physicians at both study sites rated their interactions highly (mean = 4.32 and 4.51 out of 5 for supportive relationships and quality communication, respectively). No difference in either factor was reported between physicians and nurses at either study site, but the two study sites differed significantly in both factors [F(2, 245) = 7.54, p < 0.001].
Overall, oncology nurses and oncologists at outpatient clinics rated their levels of interprofessional interaction highly. Contextual factors may have contributed to the high interaction scores and different ratings between the two cancer centres. The finding that nurses and physicians reported similar levels of perceived interactions suggests that relationships in these outpatient cancer clinics are highly collaborative and collegial.
评估肿瘤门诊中护士与医生之间互动的感知质量。
在加拿大安大略省的两个地区癌症中心的肿瘤门诊进行了一项横断面观察性调查,涉及250名医生和护士。管理人员确定符合条件的参与者,并邀请他们完成一次性调查问卷。使用一项关于关系协调的七项调查来评估互动质量,该调查衡量互动的两个因素:支持性的关系和高质量的沟通。进行描述性分析和多变量方差分析(MANOVA)以评估两个研究地点和两个专业组之间的潜在差异。
总体而言,两个研究地点的护士和医生对他们之间的互动评价都很高(支持性的关系和高质量的沟通在5分制下的平均分分别为4.32和4.51)。在任何一个研究地点,医生和护士在这两个因素上均未报告有差异,但两个研究地点在这两个因素上均存在显著差异[F(2, 245) = 7.54, p < 0.001]。
总体而言,肿瘤门诊的护士和肿瘤学家对他们的跨专业互动水平评价很高。背景因素可能导致了较高的互动得分以及两个癌症中心之间不同的评分。护士和医生报告的感知互动水平相似这一发现表明,这些癌症门诊中的关系具有高度协作性和同事关系性。