Lambert Matthew C, Hurley Kristin Duppong, Gross Thomas J, Epstein Michael H, Stevens Amy L
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 273 Barkley Memorial Center, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA,
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 May;42(3):356-62. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0575-z.
Tests that measure the emotional and behavioral problems of children and youth are typically not normed and standardized on youth diagnosed with disruptive behavior, particularly those youth in residential care. Yet professional standards mandate that before instruments are used with a specific population the psychometric properties need to be studied and re-established: specifically, psychometric properties, including validity, need to be evaluated (AERA, APA, and NCME, The standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA, Washington, DC, 1999). The purpose of the present study was to assess the validity characteristics of the Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS; Bickman et al., Manual of the Peabody Treatment Progress Battery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 2010), a widely used test developed for use in outpatient clinics, with youth in a residential care program. The convergent validity of the SFSS was established with the large correlations (0.78-0.86) with the CBCL. Several binary classification analyses including specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and the Youden Index supported the validity of the SFSS. However, the sensitivity index was somewhat low indicating the test may produce a high level of false negatives. Limitations, future research and implications are discussed.
用于测量儿童和青少年情绪及行为问题的测试通常未在被诊断为破坏性行为的青少年中进行常模制定和标准化,尤其是那些在寄宿照料机构中的青少年。然而,专业标准要求在将工具用于特定人群之前,需要对其心理测量特性进行研究和重新确立:具体而言,包括效度在内的心理测量特性需要进行评估(美国教育研究协会、美国心理学会和美国国家教育测量委员会,《教育和心理测试标准》。美国教育研究协会,华盛顿特区,1999年)。本研究的目的是评估症状与功能严重程度量表(SFSS;比克曼等人,《皮博迪治疗进展电池手册》,范德比尔特大学,田纳西州纳什维尔,2010年)的效度特征,该量表是一种广泛用于门诊诊所的测试,用于寄宿照料项目中的青少年。SFSS与儿童行为检查表(CBCL)的高相关性(0.78 - 0.86)确立了其收敛效度。包括特异性、受试者工作特征曲线下面积、阳性和阴性似然比以及尤登指数在内的多项二元分类分析支持了SFSS的效度。然而,敏感性指数有点低,表明该测试可能会产生较高水平的假阴性。讨论了研究的局限性、未来研究方向及意义。