Centre for Environment, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Lowestoft, United Kingdom.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Aug;1322:48-60. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12489. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
The emergence of an ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF) was characterized by the adoption of objectives for maintaining ecosystem health alongside those for fisheries. The EAF was expected to meet some aspirations for biodiversity conservation, but health was principally linked to sustainable use rather than lower levels of human impact. Consequently, while policies including EAF concepts identified objectives for fisheries management and biodiversity conservation, the wording often reflected unresolved societal and political debates about objectives and gave imprecise guidance on addressing inevitable trade-offs. Despite scientific progress in making trade-offs and consequences explicit, there remain substantial differences in interpretations of acceptable impact, responses to uncertainty and risk, and the use of management measures by groups accountable for fisheries management and biodiversity conservation. Within and among nations and regions, these differences are influenced by the contribution of fisheries, aquaculture, farming, and trade to food security, consumers' options, and other social, economic, and environmental factors. Notwithstanding, mutual understanding of the motivations and norms of fisheries management and biodiversity conservation groups is increasing, and interactions between these groups have likely supported more progress toward meeting their stated objectives than would have otherwise been achievable.
渔业生态系统方法(EAF)的出现,其特点是除了渔业目标外,还采用了维持生态系统健康的目标。EAF 有望满足一些生物多样性保护的愿望,但健康主要与可持续利用相关,而不是与人类影响程度降低相关。因此,虽然包括 EAF 概念在内的政策确定了渔业管理和生物多样性保护的目标,但措辞往往反映了社会和政治关于目标的未解决的辩论,并且在解决不可避免的权衡问题上提供了不精确的指导。尽管在明确权衡和后果方面取得了科学进展,但对可接受影响、对不确定性和风险的反应以及负责渔业管理和生物多样性保护的群体对管理措施的使用,仍存在重大差异。在国家和地区内部和之间,这些差异受到渔业、水产养殖、农业和贸易对粮食安全、消费者选择以及其他社会、经济和环境因素的影响。尽管如此,对渔业管理和生物多样性保护群体的动机和规范的相互理解正在增加,而且这些群体之间的相互作用可能比其他情况下更有助于实现他们既定的目标。