Guillette Lauren M, Hahn Allison H, Hoeschele Marisa, Przyslupski Ann-Marie, Sturdy Christopher B
Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada,
Anim Cogn. 2015 Jan;18(1):165-78. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0787-3. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
Cognitive processes are important to animals because they not only influence how animals acquire, store and recall information, but also may underpin behaviours such as deciding where to look for food, build a nest, or with whom to mate. Several recent studies have begun to examine the potential interaction between variation in cognition and variation in personality traits. One hypothesis proposed that there is a speed-accuracy trade-off in cognition ability that aligns with a fast-slow behaviour type. Here, we explicitly examined this hypothesis by testing wild-caught black-capped chickadees in a series of cognitive tasks that assessed both learning speed (the number of trials taken to learn) and accuracy (post-acquisition performance when tested with un-trained exemplars). Chickadees' exploration scores were measured in a novel environment task. We found that slow-exploring chickadees demonstrated higher accuracy during the test phase, but did not learn the initial task in fewer trials compared to fast-exploring chickadees, providing partial support for the proposed link between cognition and personality. We report positive correlations in learning speed between different phases within cognitive tasks, but not between the three cognitive tasks suggesting independence in underlying cognitive processing. We discuss different rule-based strategies that may contribute to differential performance accuracy in cognitive tasks and provide suggestions for future experimentation to examine mechanisms underlying the relationship between cognition and personality.
认知过程对动物很重要,因为它们不仅影响动物获取、存储和回忆信息的方式,还可能支撑诸如决定去哪里寻找食物、筑巢或与谁交配等行为。最近的几项研究开始探讨认知变异与性格特征变异之间的潜在相互作用。一种假设认为,认知能力存在速度-准确性权衡,这与快-慢行为类型相一致。在这里,我们通过在一系列认知任务中测试野生捕获的黑顶山雀来明确检验这一假设,这些任务评估了学习速度(学习所需的试验次数)和准确性(用未训练的示例进行测试时的习得后表现)。在新环境任务中测量了山雀的探索得分。我们发现,与快速探索的山雀相比,缓慢探索的山雀在测试阶段表现出更高的准确性,但在更少的试验次数内没有学会初始任务,这为认知与性格之间的拟议联系提供了部分支持。我们报告了认知任务不同阶段之间学习速度的正相关,但三项认知任务之间没有正相关,这表明潜在认知处理具有独立性。我们讨论了可能导致认知任务中不同表现准确性的基于规则的不同策略,并为未来实验提供了建议,以研究认知与性格之间关系的潜在机制。