Kwong Wilson Tak-Yu, Ondrejková Alena, Vege Santhi Swaroop
Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, 9500 Gilman Drive (MC 0956), La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic.
Pancreatology. 2016 Nov-Dec;16(6):940-945. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: After the creation of the moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) category in the Revised Atlanta Classification in 2012, predictors to identify these patients early have not been identified. The MSAP category includes patients with (peri)pancreatic necrosis, fluid collections, and transient organ failure in the same category. However, these outcomes have not been studied to determine whether they result in similar outcomes to merit inclusion in the same severity.
Retrospective, review of 514 consecutive, direct admissions for acute pancreatitis from 2010 to 2013. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of MSAP.
Persistent SIRS was the best prognostic marker of MSAP with AUC 0.72. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for persistent SIRS to predict MSAP are: 55%, 88%, 40%, 93%, and 84%. Patients with necrosis had significantly longer length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.0001) and higher rates of ICU admission (p = 0.02) compared with patients with transient organ failure. Compared to those with acute fluid collections, patients with necrosis had longer LOS (p < 0.0001), higher rates of ICU admission (p = 0.0005), required more interventions (p = 0.001), and demonstrated higher mortality (0.003).
Moderately severe pancreatitis can be distinguished from mild pancreatitis on the basis of persistent SIRS but cannot be accurately distinguished from severe pancreatitis in the first 48 h (Peri)pancreatic necrosis demonstrates significantly more morbidity compared to the other components of MSAP of fluid collections and transient organ failure.
背景/目的:2012年修订的亚特兰大分类法中新增了中度重症急性胰腺炎(MSAP)这一类别后,尚未确定能早期识别这些患者的预测指标。MSAP类别包括伴有胰腺(周围)坏死、积液和短暂器官功能衰竭的患者。然而,尚未对这些结局进行研究以确定它们是否会导致相似的结局而值得纳入同一严重程度类别。
对2010年至2013年连续直接收治的514例急性胰腺炎患者进行回顾性研究。多因素逻辑回归分析确定MSAP的预测指标。
持续性全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)是MSAP的最佳预后标志物,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.72。持续性SIRS预测MSAP的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为:55%、88%、40%、93%和84%。与短暂器官功能衰竭患者相比,坏死患者的住院时间(LOS)显著更长(p = 0.0001),重症监护病房(ICU)入住率更高(p = 0.02)。与急性积液患者相比,坏死患者的LOS更长(p < 0.0001),ICU入住率更高(p = 0.0005),需要更多的干预措施(p = 0.001),且死亡率更高(0.003)。
中度重症胰腺炎可根据持续性SIRS与轻度胰腺炎相区分,但在最初48小时内无法与重症胰腺炎准确区分。与MSAP的积液和短暂器官功能衰竭的其他组成部分相比,胰腺(周围)坏死的发病率显著更高。