Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St. Paul, MN, United States; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St. Paul, MN, United States; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Gait Posture. 2014 Sep;40(4):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
A statistical orthosis selection model was developed using the Random Forest Algorithm (RFA). The model's performance and potential clinical benefit was evaluated. The model predicts which of five orthosis designs - solid (SAFO), posterior leaf spring (PLS), hinged (HAFO), supra-malleolar (SMO), or foot orthosis (FO) - will provide the best gait outcome for individuals with diplegic cerebral palsy (CP). Gait outcome was defined as the change in Gait Deviation Index (GDI) between walking while wearing an orthosis compared to barefoot (ΔGDI=GDIOrthosis-GDIBarefoot). Model development was carried out using retrospective data from 476 individuals who wore one of the five orthosis designs bilaterally. Clinical benefit was estimated by predicting the optimal orthosis and ΔGDI for 1016 individuals (age: 12.6 (6.7) years), 540 of whom did not have an existing orthosis prescription. Among limbs with an orthosis, the model agreed with the prescription only 14% of the time. For 56% of limbs without an orthosis, the model agreed that no orthosis was expected to provide benefit. Using the current standard of care orthosis (i.e. existing orthosis prescriptions), ΔGDI is only +0.4 points on average. Using the orthosis prediction model, average ΔGDI for orthosis users was estimated to improve to +5.6 points. The results of this study suggest that an orthosis selection model derived from the RFA can significantly improve outcomes from orthosis use for the diplegic CP population. Further validation of the model is warranted using data from other centers and a prospective study.
采用随机森林算法(RFA)开发了一种统计矫形器选择模型。评估了该模型的性能和潜在的临床益处。该模型预测了五个矫形器设计中的哪一个——实心(SAFO)、后叶弹簧(PLS)、铰链(HAFO)、踝上(SMO)或足矫形器(FO)——将为双瘫脑瘫(CP)患者提供最佳步态结果。步态结果定义为佩戴矫形器行走时与赤脚相比的步态偏差指数(GDI)变化(ΔGDI=GDIOrthosis-GDIBarefoot)。模型开发使用了 476 名双侧佩戴五种矫形器设计之一的个体的回顾性数据进行。通过预测 1016 名个体(年龄:12.6(6.7)岁)的最佳矫形器和ΔGDI 来估计临床益处,其中 540 名个体没有现有的矫形器处方。在有矫形器的肢体中,模型只有 14%的时间与处方相符。对于 56%没有矫形器的肢体,模型认为不需要矫形器。使用当前标准的护理矫形器(即现有的矫形器处方),平均ΔGDI仅增加 0.4 点。使用矫形器预测模型,预计佩戴矫形器的个体的平均ΔGDI 可提高到+5.6 点。本研究结果表明,源自 RFA 的矫形器选择模型可以显著改善双瘫 CP 人群使用矫形器的效果。需要使用来自其他中心和前瞻性研究的数据进一步验证该模型。