Gkantidis Nikolaos, Mistakidis Ilias, Kouskoura Thaleia, Pandis Nikolaos
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
J Dent. 2014 Oct;42(10):1300-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
To assess the available evidence on the effectiveness of accelerated orthodontic tooth movement through surgical and non-surgical approaches in orthodontic patients.
Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials were identified through electronic and hand searches (last update: March 2014). Orthognathic surgery, distraction osteogenesis, and pharmacological approaches were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Eighteen trials involving 354 participants were included for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Eight trials reported on low-intensity laser, one on photobiomodulation, one on pulsed electromagnetic fields, seven on corticotomy, and one on interseptal bone reduction. Two studies on corticotomy and two on low-intensity laser, which had low or unclear risk of bias, were mathematically combined using the random effects model. Higher canine retraction rate was evident with corticotomy during the first month of therapy (WMD=0.73; 95% CI: 0.28, 1.19, p<0.01) and with low-intensity laser (WMD=0.42mm/month; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.57, p<0.001) in a period longer than 3 months. The quality of evidence supporting the interventions is moderate for laser therapy and low for corticotomy intervention.
There is some evidence that low laser therapy and corticotomy are effective, whereas the evidence is weak for interseptal bone reduction and very weak for photobiomodulation and pulsed electromagnetic fields. Overall, the results should be interpreted with caution given the small number, quality, and heterogeneity of the included studies. Further research is required in this field with additional attention to application protocols, adverse effects, and cost-benefit analysis.
From the qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the studies, it could be concluded that there is some evidence that low laser therapy and corticotomy are associated with accelerated orthodontic tooth movement, while further investigation is required before routine application.
评估通过手术和非手术方法实现正畸患者加速牙齿移动有效性的现有证据。
通过电子检索和手工检索(最后更新时间:2014年3月)确定随机对照试验和对照临床试验。排除正颌手术、牵张成骨和药物治疗方法。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。
纳入18项试验,共354名参与者进行定性和定量综合分析。8项试验报告了低强度激光,1项报告了光生物调节,1项报告了脉冲电磁场,7项报告了皮质切开术,1项报告了牙间隔骨减少。两项皮质切开术研究和两项低强度激光研究,其偏倚风险较低或不明确,使用随机效应模型进行数学合并。在治疗的第一个月,皮质切开术(加权均数差[WMD]=0.73;95%置信区间[CI]:0.28,1.19,p<0.01)和低强度激光(WMD=0.42mm/月;95%CI:0.26,0.57,p<0.001)在超过3个月的时间内犬齿后移率更高。支持这些干预措施的证据质量,激光治疗为中等,皮质切开术干预为低等。
有一些证据表明低强度激光治疗和皮质切开术是有效的,而牙间隔骨减少的证据较弱,光生物调节和脉冲电磁场的证据非常弱。总体而言,鉴于纳入研究的数量、质量和异质性,结果应谨慎解释。该领域需要进一步研究,尤其要关注应用方案、不良反应和成本效益分析。
从研究的定性和定量综合分析可以得出结论,有一些证据表明低强度激光治疗和皮质切开术与正畸牙齿加速移动有关,但在常规应用之前还需要进一步研究。