Wright Matthew D, Portas Matthew D, Evans Victoria J, Weston Matthew
1Sport and Wellbeing, Student Services, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom; and 2Sport and Exercise, School of Social Sciences and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Jan;29(1):254-61. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000602.
The effectiveness of fundamental movement training interventions in adolescents is not fully understood. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) may provide means of evaluating the effectiveness of such programs alongside traditional tests of physiological performance. Twenty-two children completed the FMS, plank, side plank, sit and reach, and multistage fitness test. Participants were pair matched by total FMS score and assigned to control or intervention. The intervention group received a weekly 4 × 30-minute training sessions with an emphasis on movement quality, whereas the control group was involved in generic multisport activity. A smallest worthwhile effect of 0.2 between-participant SDs was set a priori for all measures except total FMS score for which a change of 1 unit was chosen. When compared with the control, our intervention had a likely trivial effect for FMS score (0.2 Arbitrary Units [AU], 90% confidence limits ±1.2 AU), a very likely small beneficial effect for plank score (87 ± 55%), but a possibly small harmful effect for side plank score (-22 ± 49%). A likely trivial effect was observed for the sit and reach test (0.3 ± 15%), whereas the effect of the training intervention on predicted (Equation is included in full-text article.)was unclear (-0.3 ± 11%). Unexpectedly, generic multisport activity enhanced both side plank and sit and reach test performances in the control group. These results demonstrated that short-term interventions might affect specific isolated components of fitness but not FMS performance.
基础运动训练干预措施对青少年的有效性尚未完全明确。功能性动作筛查(FMS)或许能提供评估此类项目有效性的方法,可与传统的生理性能测试一同使用。22名儿童完成了FMS测试、平板支撑、侧平板支撑、坐位体前屈和多阶段体能测试。参与者按FMS总分进行配对,并被分配至对照组或干预组。干预组每周接受4次、每次30分钟的训练课程,重点在于动作质量,而对照组则参与一般性的多项运动活动。除FMS总分外,所有测量指标的最小有价值效应预先设定为0.2个参与者标准差,FMS总分的变化则选定为1个单位。与对照组相比,我们的干预措施对FMS分数可能产生微不足道的影响(0.2任意单位[AU],90%置信区间±1.2 AU),对平板支撑分数很可能产生较小的有益影响(87±55%),但对侧平板支撑分数可能产生较小的有害影响(-22±49%)。坐位体前屈测试观察到可能微不足道的影响(0.3±15%),而训练干预对预测值(公式包含在全文中)的影响不明确(-0.3±11%)。出乎意料的是,一般性的多项运动活动提高了对照组的侧平板支撑和坐位体前屈测试成绩。这些结果表明,短期干预可能会影响体能的特定孤立组成部分,但不会影响FMS表现。