Wakeam Elliot, Asafu-Adjei Denise, Ashley Stanley W, Cooper Zara, Weissman Joel S
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):930-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
Critical care is often an integral part of rescue for patients with surgical complications. We sought to understand critical care characteristics predictive of failure-to-rescue (FTR) performance at the hospital level.
Using 2009 to 2011 FTR data from Hospital Compare, we identified 144 outlier hospitals with significantly better/worse performance than the national average. We surveyed intensive care unit (ICU) directors and nurse managers regarding physical structures, patient composition, staffing, care protocols, and rapid response teams (RRTs). Hospitals were compared using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.
Of 67 hospitals completing the survey, 56.1% were low performing, and 43.9% were high performing. Responders were more likely to be teaching hospitals (40.9% vs 25.0%; P=.05) but were similar to nonresponders in terms of size, region, ownership, and FTR performance. Poor performers were more likely to serve higher proportions of Medicaid patients (68.4% vs 20.7%; P<.0001) and be level 1 trauma centers (55.9% vs 25.9%; P=.02). After controlling for these 2 characteristics, an intensivist on the RRT (adjusted odds ratio, 4.27; confidence interval, 1.45-23.02; P=.005) and an internist on staff in the ICU (adjusted odds ratio, 2.13; P=.04) were predictors of high performance.
Intensivists on the RRT and internists in the ICU may represent discrete organizational strategies for improving patient rescue. Hospitals with high Medicaid burden fare poorly on the FTR metric.
重症监护通常是手术并发症患者救治的重要组成部分。我们试图了解在医院层面预测未能成功救治(FTR)表现的重症监护特征。
利用2009年至2011年“医院比较”中的FTR数据,我们确定了144家表现明显优于/差于全国平均水平的异常医院。我们就物理结构、患者构成、人员配备、护理方案和快速反应小组(RRT)对重症监护病房(ICU)主任和护士长进行了调查。使用描述性统计和逻辑回归对医院进行比较。
在完成调查的67家医院中,56.1%表现不佳,43.9%表现良好。应答者更有可能是教学医院(40.9%对25.0%;P = 0.05),但在规模、地区、所有权和FTR表现方面与未应答者相似。表现不佳的医院更有可能为更高比例的医疗补助患者提供服务(68.4%对20.7%;P < 0.0001),并且是一级创伤中心(55.9%对25.9%;P = 0.02)。在控制这两个特征后,RRT上的一名重症医学专家(调整后的优势比,4.27;置信区间,1.45 - 23.02;P = 0.005)和ICU在职的一名内科医生(调整后的优势比,2.13;P = 0.04)是高绩效的预测因素。
RRT上的重症医学专家和ICU中的内科医生可能代表了改善患者救治的不同组织策略。医疗补助负担高的医院在FTR指标上表现不佳。