Suppr超能文献

我们失败的地方:创伤救治中未能成功挽救的位置和时机

Where We Fail: Location and Timing of Failure to Rescue in Trauma.

作者信息

Chung Jennifer J, Earl-Royal Emily C, Delgado M Kit, Pascual Jose L, Reilly Patrick M, Wiebe Douglas J, Holena Daniel N

出版信息

Am Surg. 2017 Mar 1;83(3):250-256.

Abstract

Failure to rescue (FTR) is an outcome metric that reflects a center's ability to prevent mortality after a major complication. Identifying the timing and location of FTR events could help target efforts to reduce FTR rates. We sought to characterize the timing and location of FTR occurrences at our center, hypothesizing that FTR rates would be highest early after injury and in settings of lower intensity of care. We used data, prospectively collected from 2009 to 2013, on patients ≥16 years old with minimum Abbreviated Injury Score ≥2 from a single institution. Major complications (per Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation definitions), mortality, and FTR rates were examined by location [prehospital, emergency department, operating room, intensive care unit (ICU), and interventional radiology] and by day post admission. Kruskal-Wallis and chi-squared tests were used to compare variables (P = 0.05). Major complications occurred in 899/6150 (14.6%) of patients [median age: 42, interquartile range (IQR): 25-57; 56% African American, 73% male, 76% blunt; median Injury Severity Score: 10, IQR: 5-17]. Of 899, 111 died (FTR = 12.4%). Compared with non-FTR cases, FTR cases had earlier complications (median day 1 (IQR: 0-4) versus 5 (IQR: 2-8), P < 0.001). FTR rates were highest in the prehospital (55%), emergency department (38%), and operating room (36%) settings, but the greatest number of FTR cases occurred in the ICU (52/111, 47%). FTR rates were highest early after injury, but the majority of cases occurred in the ICU. Efforts to reduce institutional FTR rates should focus on complications that occur in the ICU setting.

摘要

未能成功挽救(FTR)是一种结果指标,反映了一个中心在出现重大并发症后预防死亡的能力。确定FTR事件的时间和地点有助于针对性地努力降低FTR发生率。我们试图描述我们中心FTR发生的时间和地点,假设FTR发生率在受伤后早期以及护理强度较低的情况下最高。我们使用了从2009年到2013年前瞻性收集的来自单一机构的≥16岁、最低简略损伤评分≥2的患者的数据。根据宾夕法尼亚创伤系统基金会的定义,对主要并发症、死亡率和FTR发生率按地点[院前、急诊科、手术室、重症监护病房(ICU)和介入放射科]以及入院后天数进行了检查。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验来比较变量(P = 0.05)。899/6150(14.6%)的患者发生了主要并发症[中位年龄:42岁,四分位间距(IQR):25 - 57岁;56%为非裔美国人,73%为男性,76%为钝性伤;中位损伤严重度评分:10分,IQR:5 - 17分]。在这899例患者中,111例死亡(FTR = 12.4%)。与非FTR病例相比,FTR病例的并发症出现得更早(中位时间为第1天(IQR:0 - 4),而非第5天(IQR:2 - 8),P < 0.001)。FTR发生率在院前(55%)、急诊科(38%)和手术室(36%)环境中最高,但FTR病例数量最多的是在ICU(52/111,47%)。FTR发生率在受伤后早期最高,但大多数病例发生在ICU。降低机构FTR发生率的努力应集中在ICU环境中发生的并发症上。

相似文献

4
A metric of our own: Failure to rescue after trauma.我们自己的一个指标:创伤后救治失败。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Oct;83(4):698-704. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001591.
7
Failure to rescue in trauma: Coming to terms with the second term.创伤救治失败:正视第二个术语。
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Variability in Current Trauma Systems and Outcomes.当前创伤系统与结果的变异性。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jul-Sep;13(3):201-207. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_49_19. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Failure to rescue in trauma: Coming to terms with the second term.创伤救治失败:正视第二个术语。
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
4
Comparing Preoperative Targets to Failure-to-Rescue for Surgical Mortality Improvement.比较术前目标与未能挽救以改善手术死亡率。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jun;220(6):1096-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.036. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验