Division of Neurology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, C.so Mazzini 18, 28100 Novara, Italy.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012 Dec;3(6):279-89. doi: 10.1177/2042098612455357.
Topiramate is an antiepileptic drug (AED) with multiple mechanisms of action that has been shown to be effective in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, cognitive dysfunction is frequently observed in such patients, often representing a relevant challenge in their management. Moreover, there is a long-held recognition that AEDs may profoundly affect cognitive functions. This paper reviews available data on cognitive adverse events in patients with neurological disorders treated with topiramate, discussing the role of different contributing factors such as the pharmacological properties of the drug, the specific features of the brain disorder, and other variables pertinent to the discussion. All studies agree that up to 10% of patients may complain of treatment-emergent adverse events on cognition. Such problems occur early during treatment (i.e. within 6 weeks) and emerge in a dose-dependent fashion, suggesting that such prevalence may be significantly reduced using the drug in monotherapy and adopting individualized doses and titration schedules. The magnitude of the problem is generally mild to moderate and the subjective perception of the patient needs to be taken into account. In fact, apart from language problems, data are not conclusive. Comparisons with new AEDs are limited to levetiracetam and lamotrigine, in both cases generally disfavoring topiramate, while data regarding first-generation AEDs show clear differences only for verbal fluency.
托吡酯是一种具有多种作用机制的抗癫痫药物(AED),已被证明在多种神经精神疾病中有效。然而,此类患者经常出现认知功能障碍,这通常是其治疗中的一个重要挑战。此外,长期以来人们认识到,AED 可能会深刻影响认知功能。本文综述了接受托吡酯治疗的神经障碍患者认知不良事件的现有数据,讨论了不同因素的作用,如药物的药理学特性、大脑障碍的具体特征以及与讨论相关的其他变量。所有研究均表明,高达 10%的患者可能会出现与认知相关的治疗后不良事件。这些问题在治疗早期(即在 6 周内)出现,且呈剂量依赖性,这表明在单药治疗中使用该药并采用个体化剂量和滴定方案,可能会显著降低这种患病率。问题的严重程度通常为轻度至中度,需要考虑患者的主观感受。实际上,除了语言问题外,数据尚无定论。与新型 AED 的比较仅限于左乙拉西坦和拉莫三嗪,在这两种情况下,托吡酯通常都不占优势,而第一代 AED 的数据仅显示在言语流畅性方面存在明显差异。