Sohal Manav, Duckett Simon G, Zhuang Xiahai, Shi Wenzhe, Ginks Matthew, Shetty Anoop, Sammut Eva, Kozerke Sebastian, Niederer Steven, Smith Nic, Ourselin Sebastien, Rinaldi Christopher Aldo, Rueckert Daniel, Carr-White Gerald, Razavi Reza
Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, London, UK.
The Department of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Aug 1;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12968-014-0058-0.
Many patients with electrical dyssynchrony who undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) do not obtain substantial benefit. Assessing mechanical dyssynchrony may improve patient selection. Results from studies using echocardiographic imaging to measure dyssynchrony have ultimately proved disappointing. We sought to evaluate cardiac motion in patients with heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We developed a framework for comparing measures of myocardial mechanics and evaluated how well they predicted response to CRT.
CMR was performed at 1.5 Tesla prior to CRT. Steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine images and complementary modulation of magnetization (CSPAMM) tagged cine images were acquired. Images were processed using a novel framework to extract regional ventricular volume-change, thickening and deformation fields (strain). A systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) for all parameters within a 16-segment model of the ventricle was computed with high SDI denoting more dyssynchrony. Once identified, the optimal measure was applied to a second patient population to determine its utility as a predictor of CRT response compared to current accepted predictors (QRS duration, LBBB morphology and scar burden).
Forty-four patients were recruited in the first phase (91% male, 63.3 ± 14.1 years; 80% NYHA class III) with mean QRSd 154 ± 24 ms. Twenty-one out of 44 (48%) patients showed reverse remodelling (RR) with a decrease in end systolic volume (ESV) ≥ 15% at 6 months. Volume-change SDI was the strongest predictor of RR (PR 5.67; 95% CI 1.95-16.5; P = 0.003). SDI derived from myocardial strain was least predictive. Volume-change SDI was applied as a predictor of RR to a second population of 50 patients (70% male, mean age 68.6 ± 12.2 years, 76% NYHA class III) with mean QRSd 146 ± 21 ms. When compared to QRSd, LBBB morphology and scar burden, volume-change SDI was the only statistically significant predictor of RR in this group.
A systolic dyssynchrony index derived from volume-change is a highly reproducible measurement that can be derived from routinely acquired SSFP cine images and predicts RR following CRT whilst an SDI of regional strain does not.
许多接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的电不同步患者并未获得显著益处。评估机械不同步可能有助于改善患者选择。使用超声心动图成像测量不同步的研究结果最终令人失望。我们试图使用心血管磁共振(CMR)评估心力衰竭和电不同步患者的心脏运动。我们开发了一个比较心肌力学测量指标的框架,并评估它们对CRT反应的预测能力。
在CRT之前进行1.5特斯拉的CMR检查。采集稳态自由进动(SSFP)电影图像和互补式磁化调制(CSPAMM)标记电影图像。使用一种新颖的框架对图像进行处理,以提取局部心室容积变化、增厚和变形场(应变)。计算心室16节段模型内所有参数的收缩期不同步指数(SDI),高SDI表示不同步程度更高。一旦确定,将最佳测量指标应用于另一组患者,以确定其作为CRT反应预测指标的效用,并与当前公认的预测指标(QRS波时限、左束支传导阻滞形态和瘢痕负荷)进行比较。
第一阶段招募了44例患者(91%为男性,年龄63.3±14.1岁;80%为纽约心脏协会III级),平均QRS波时限为154±24毫秒。44例患者中有21例(48%)出现逆向重构(RR),6个月时收缩末期容积(ESV)减少≥15%。容积变化SDI是RR的最强预测指标(PR 5.67;95%CI 1.95 - 16.5;P = 0.003)。源自心肌应变的SDI预测能力最差。将容积变化SDI作为RR的预测指标应用于另一组50例患者(70%为男性,平均年龄68.6±12.2岁,76%为纽约心脏协会III级),平均QRS波时限为146±21毫秒。与QRS波时限、左束支传导阻滞形态和瘢痕负荷相比,容积变化SDI是该组中RR唯一具有统计学意义的预测指标。
源自容积变化的收缩期不同步指数是一种高度可重复的测量指标,可以从常规采集的SSFP电影图像中得出,并能预测CRT后的RR,而局部应变的SDI则不能。