Overestimation of risk ratios by odds ratios in trials and cohort studies: alternatives to logistic regression.
作者信息
Knol Mirjam J, Le Cessie Saskia, Algra Ale, Vandenbroucke Jan P, Groenwold Rolf H H
机构信息
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
出版信息
CMAJ. 2012 May 15;184(8):895-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101715. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Overestimation of risk ratios by odds ratios in trials and cohort studies: alternatives to logistic regression.在试验和队列研究中，比值比对比值比的风险比高估：逻辑回归的替代方法。
CMAJ. 2012 May 15;184(8):895-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101715. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
2
[Down with odds ratios: risk ratios in cohort studies and randomised clinical trials].[摒弃比值比：队列研究和随机临床试验中的风险比]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(28):A4775.
3
Confounding, effect modification, and the odds ratio: common misinterpretations.混杂因素、效应修饰与比值比：常见误解
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):470-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
4
Statistics for clinicians: An introduction to logistic regression.临床医生统计学：逻辑回归简介。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Jul;51(7):670-3. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12895. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
5
Risk ratios and odds ratios for common events in cross-sectional and cohort studies.横断面研究和队列研究中常见事件的风险比和比值比。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):649-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00773.x.
6
Comparison of methods for analysing cluster randomized trials: an example involving a factorial design.群组随机试验分析方法的比较：一个涉及析因设计的实例
Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;32(5):840-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg228.
7
What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.相对风险是什么？一种在常见结局队列研究中校正优势比的方法。
JAMA. 1998 Nov 18;280(19):1690-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.19.1690.
8
Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models.对数几率与逻辑回归模型的解释。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):859-878. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12712. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
Statistical methods for analyzing sequentially randomized trials.用于分析序贯随机试验的统计方法。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Nov 7;99(21):1577-82. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm185. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
10
Potential misinterpretation of treatment effects due to use of odds ratios and logistic regression in randomized controlled trials.由于在随机对照试验中使用优势比和 logistic 回归，可能会对治疗效果产生误解。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021248. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
引用本文的文献
1
Very preterm, very low birth weight infants not admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, National Vital Statistics Surveillance Data, United States 2021.2021年美国国家生命统计监测数据中的未入住新生儿重症监护病房的极早产、极低出生体重婴儿
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0328916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328916. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-utility analysis of adjunctive psychosocial therapies in bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍辅助心理社会治疗的成本效用分析
BJPsych Open. 2025 Jul 21;11(4):e156. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10068.
3
How can we predict mortality in acute stroke?我们如何预测急性中风的死亡率？
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Jun 16;71(5):e20250057. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20250057. eCollection 2025.
4
Biomarker-Guided Imaging and AI-Augmented Diagnosis of Degenerative Joint Disease.生物标志物引导的退行性关节疾病成像与人工智能辅助诊断
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 3;15(11):1418. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111418.
5
Mental health and energy drink consumption among Norwegian adolescents; a cross-sectional study.挪威青少年的心理健康与能量饮料消费情况；一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;25(1):2158. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23432-6.
6
Real-world interpretation of procalcitonin to guide antibiotic prescribing: a retrospective cohort study with regression discontinuity analysis.降钙素原在指导抗生素处方中的真实世界解读：一项采用回归断点分析的回顾性队列研究
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 May 28;5(1):e119. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.72. eCollection 2025.
7
Potential Harms of Feedback After Web-Based Depression Screening: Secondary Analysis of Negative Effects in the Randomized Controlled DISCOVER Trial.基于网络的抑郁症筛查后反馈的潜在危害：随机对照DISCOVER试验中负面影响的二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e59476. doi: 10.2196/59476.
8
Fracture risk by cortisol excess status in patients with adrenal incidentalomas: a population-based cohort study.肾上腺偶发瘤患者皮质醇过量状态与骨折风险：一项基于人群的队列研究。
JBMR Plus. 2025 Mar 16;9(5):ziaf043. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf043. eCollection 2025 May.
9
Decoding unintentional weight loss: How the right questions make a difference.解读非故意性体重减轻：正确的问题如何产生影响。
Clin Nutr. 2025 Jun;49:98-101. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2025.04.009. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
10
Prediction of Rehospitalization in Cardiac Bypass Surgery.心脏搭桥手术再住院的预测
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Feb;122(2):e20240706. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240706.
本文引用的文献
1
A tutorial on methods to estimating clinically and policy-meaningful measures of treatment effects in prospective observational studies: a review.前瞻性观察性研究中估计治疗效果的临床和政策意义测量方法教程：综述
Int J Biostat. 2011;7(1):6. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1285. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
2
Potential misinterpretation of treatment effects due to use of odds ratios and logistic regression in randomized controlled trials.由于在随机对照试验中使用优势比和 logistic 回归，可能会对治疗效果产生误解。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021248. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
3
Reporting of treatment effects from randomized trials: a plea for multivariable risk ratios.报告随机试验治疗效果：呼吁使用多变量风险比。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):399-402. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.12.011. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
4
Absolute risk reductions, relative risks, relative risk reductions, and numbers needed to treat can be obtained from a logistic regression model.绝对风险降低率、相对危险度、相对危险度降低率和需要治疗的人数可从逻辑回归模型中获得。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.004. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
5
What do case-control studies estimate? Survey of methods and assumptions in published case-control research.病例对照研究估计的是什么？已发表的病例对照研究中的方法与假设调查。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Nov 1;168(9):1073-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn217. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
6
Changes in maternal marital status are associated with young adults' cannabis use: evidence from a 21-year follow-up of a birth cohort.母亲婚姻状况的变化与年轻人使用大麻有关：来自一个出生队列21年随访的证据。
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Jun;35(3):673-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi320. Epub 2006 Mar 21.
7
Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial.转移性癌症所致脊髓压迫症的直接减压手术切除治疗：一项随机试验
Lancet. 2005;366(9486):643-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66954-1.
8
Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences.用于风险或患病率比值及差异的简易SAS计算。
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Aug 1;162(3):199-200. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi188. Epub 2005 Jun 29.
9
A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.一种用于二元数据前瞻性研究的修正泊松回归方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr 1;159(7):702-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh090.
10
Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio.横断面研究中逻辑回归的替代方法：直接估计患病率比的模型的实证比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Oct 20;3:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-21.
Zotero 插件