Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚的孕妇对孕产护理模式了解多少?一项关于女性报告的回顾性研究。

What are pregnant women told about models of maternity care in Australia? A retrospective study of women's reports.

作者信息

Stevens Gabrielle, Thompson Rachel, Kruske Sue, Watson Bernadette, Miller Yvette D

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Oct;97(1):114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe women's reports of the model of care options General Practitioners (GPs) discussed with them at the first pregnancy consultation and women's self-reported role in decision-making about model of care.

METHODS

Women who had recently given birth responded to survey items about the models of care GPs discussed, their role in final decision-making, and socio-demographic, obstetric history, and early pregnancy characteristics.

RESULTS

The proportion of women with whom each model of care was discussed varied between 8.2% (for private midwifery care with home birth) and 64.4% (GP shared care). Only 7.7% of women reported that all seven models were discussed. Exclusive discussion about private obstetric care and about all public models was common, and women's health insurance status was the strongest predictor of the presence of discussions about each model. Most women (82.6%) reported active involvement in final decision-making about model of care.

CONCLUSION

Although most women report involvement in maternity model of care decisions, they remain largely uninformed about the breadth of available model of care options.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Strategies that facilitate women's access to information on the differentiating features and outcomes for all models of care should be prioritized to better ensure equitable and quality decisions.

摘要

目的

描述女性对全科医生(GP)在首次孕期咨询时与她们讨论的护理模式选项的报告,以及女性自我报告在护理模式决策中的作用。

方法

近期分娩的女性对关于全科医生讨论的护理模式、她们在最终决策中的作用以及社会人口统计学、产科病史和早孕特征的调查项目做出回应。

结果

讨论每种护理模式的女性比例在8.2%(家庭分娩的私人助产护理)至64.4%(全科医生共享护理)之间变化。只有7.7%的女性报告讨论了所有七种模式。关于私人产科护理和所有公共模式的专门讨论很常见,女性的健康保险状况是每种模式讨论情况的最强预测因素。大多数女性(82.6%)报告积极参与护理模式的最终决策。

结论

尽管大多数女性报告参与了孕产护理模式的决策,但她们对可用护理模式选项的广度仍知之甚少。

实际意义

应优先采取策略,促进女性获取关于所有护理模式的区别特征和结果的信息,以更好地确保公平和高质量的决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验