School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
School of Public Health & Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Mar;3(1):83-98. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0118-7. Epub 2015 May 16.
Various policies, plans and initiatives have been implemented to provide safe, quality and culturally competent care to patients within Queensland's health care system. A series of models of maternity care are available in Queensland that range from standard public care to private midwifery care. The current study aimed to determine whether identifying as culturally or linguistically diverse (CALD) was associated with the perceived safety, quality and cultural competency of maternity care from a consumer perspective, and to identify specific needs and preferences of CALD maternity care consumers. Secondary analysis of data collected in the Having a Baby in Queensland Survey 2012 was used to compare the experiences of 655 CALD women to those of 4049 non-CALD women in Queensland, Australia, across three stages of maternity care: pregnancy, labour and birth, and after birth. After adjustment for model of maternity care received and socio-demographic characteristics, CALD women were significantly more likely than non-CALD women to experience suboptimal staff technical competence in pregnancy, overall perceived safety in pregnancy and labour/birth, and interpersonal sensitivity in pregnancy and labour/birth. Approximately 50 % of CALD women did not have the choice to use a translator or interpreter, or the gender of their care provider, during labour and birth. Thirteen themes of preferences and needs of CALD maternity care consumers based on ethnicity, cultural beliefs, or traditions were identified; however, these were rarely met. Findings imply that CALD women in Queensland experience disadvantageous maternity care with regards to perceived staff technical competence, safety, and interpersonal sensitivity, and receive care that lacks cultural competence. Improved access to support persons, continuity and choice of carer, and staff availability and training is recommended.
昆士兰州的医疗保健系统实施了各种政策、计划和举措,旨在为患者提供安全、优质和文化上胜任的护理。昆士兰州提供了一系列的产妇护理模式,从标准的公共护理到私人助产士护理都有涵盖。本研究旨在从消费者的角度确定是否认同文化或语言多样性(CALD)与产妇护理的感知安全性、质量和文化能力相关,并确定 CALD 产妇护理消费者的具体需求和偏好。本研究使用了 2012 年昆士兰生育调查中收集的数据的二次分析,比较了澳大利亚昆士兰州 655 名 CALD 妇女和 4049 名非 CALD 妇女在三个产妇护理阶段的经历:怀孕、分娩和产后。在调整了所接受的产妇护理模式和社会人口特征后,CALD 妇女在怀孕期间、整个怀孕期间和分娩期间以及怀孕期间和分娩期间的人际敏感性方面,经历的医护人员技术能力不佳、整体感知安全性以及人际敏感性等情况,明显比非 CALD 妇女更差。大约 50%的 CALD 妇女在分娩期间没有选择使用翻译或口译员,或选择自己的医护人员。根据种族、文化信仰或传统,确定了 13 个主题,涉及 CALD 产妇护理消费者的偏好和需求,但这些需求很少得到满足。研究结果表明,昆士兰州的 CALD 妇女在感知医护人员技术能力、安全性和人际敏感性方面经历了不利的产妇护理,并且接受的护理缺乏文化能力。建议改善获得支持人员、连续性和护理人员选择、以及员工的可用性和培训。