Suppr超能文献

对匿名戒酒互助会(AA)团体凝聚力的印象:一个关于预测后期参加AA情况的非特定因素的案例

Impressions of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) Group Cohesion: A Case for a Nonspecific Factor Predicting Later AA Attendance.

作者信息

Rice Samara Lloyd, Tonigan J Scott

机构信息

Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico USA.

出版信息

Alcohol Treat Q. 2012 Jan 4;30(1):40-51. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2012.635550.

Abstract

Social support for abstinence in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) has been reported to be a consistent factor accounting for AA benefit. However, the nonspecific or unintended effects of such support remain poorly understood and rarely investigated. This prospective study investigated how one nonspecific factor-perceived AA group cohesiveness-predicted increased practice of AA-related behaviors. Findings indicated that impressions of AA group cohesion predicted increased AA attendance, the practice of prescribed AA activities, and self-reported AA usefulness. It appears that a sense of belongingness predicts subsequent engagement in the AA social network that, in turn, is predictive of increased abstinence.

摘要

据报道,戒酒互助会(AA)中对戒酒的社会支持是一个持续存在的因素,可解释AA戒酒成效的原因。然而,这种支持的非特定性或非预期效果仍鲜为人知,也很少有人进行研究。这项前瞻性研究调查了一个非特定因素——对AA团体凝聚力的感知——如何预测与AA相关行为的增加。研究结果表明,对AA团体凝聚力的印象预测了AA出席率的提高、规定的AA活动的实践以及自我报告的AA有用性。归属感似乎预示着随后会参与AA社交网络,而这反过来又预示着戒酒成功率的提高。

相似文献

2
More than Taking a Chair: The Perceived Group Social Dynamics of Alcoholics Anonymous Related to Changes in Spiritual Practices.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2018;36(3):314-329. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2017.1420437. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
3
The Relationship Between Perceived Alcoholics Anonymous Social Group Dynamics and Getting an AA Sponsor.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2020;38(1):21-31. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2019.1613942. Epub 2019 May 17.
4
AA attendance and abstinence for dually diagnosed patients: a meta-analytic review.
Addiction. 2018 Nov;113(11):1970-1981. doi: 10.1111/add.14268. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
6
Is it beneficial to have an alcoholics anonymous sponsor?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Sep;24(3):397-403. doi: 10.1037/a0019013.
9
Determining the relative importance of the mechanisms of behavior change within Alcoholics Anonymous: a multiple mediator analysis.
Addiction. 2012 Feb;107(2):289-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03593.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
10
Alcoholics anonymous careers: patterns of AA involvement five years after treatment entry.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Nov;29(11):1983-90. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000187156.88588.de.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of members' attachment style on group cohesion in substance use therapy groups.
Discov Psychol. 2022;2(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s44202-022-00022-w. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
3
Group Cohesion and Climate in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Individuals with a First-Time DUI.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2020;38(1):68-86. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2019.1613941. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
The Relationship Between Perceived Alcoholics Anonymous Social Group Dynamics and Getting an AA Sponsor.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2020;38(1):21-31. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2019.1613942. Epub 2019 May 17.
5
More than Taking a Chair: The Perceived Group Social Dynamics of Alcoholics Anonymous Related to Changes in Spiritual Practices.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2018;36(3):314-329. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2017.1420437. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
6
Recovery resources and psychiatric severity among persons with substance use disorders.
Community Ment Health J. 2015 May;51(4):437-44. doi: 10.1007/s10597-014-9762-3. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
7
Spirituality as a change mechanism in 12-step programs: a replication, extension, and refinement.
Subst Use Misuse. 2013 Sep;48(12):1161-73. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2013.808540.
8
Interpersonal Climate of 12-step Groups Predicts Reductions in Alcohol Use.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2013 Apr 1;31(2):167-185. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2013.771983.
9
Process predictors of the outcome of group drug counseling.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Feb;81(1):23-34. doi: 10.1037/a0030101. Epub 2012 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
SCALE DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE TO ASSESS COMMUNITY-BASED AND CLINICAL INTERVENTION GROUP ENVIRONMENTS.
J Community Psychol. 2008 Apr;36(3):271-288. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20193.
2
Social network variables in alcoholics anonymous: a literature review.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Mar;28(3):430-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.07.014. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
3
Six-month changes in spirituality, religiousness, and heavy drinking in a treatment-seeking sample.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Mar;68(2):282-90. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.282.
4
A 3-year study of addiction mutual-help group participation following intensive outpatient treatment.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006 Aug;30(8):1381-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00165.x.
6
The 8-year course of alcohol abuse: gender differences in social context and coping.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Apr;29(4):612-21. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000158832.07705.22.
7
Social support mediates the effects of dual-focus mutual aid groups on abstinence from substance use.
Am J Community Psychol. 2004 Dec;34(3-4):175-85. doi: 10.1007/s10464-004-7413-5.
8
The persistent influence of social networks and alcoholics anonymous on abstinence.
J Stud Alcohol. 2003 Jul;64(4):579-88. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.579.
9
Examining mechanisms of action in 12-step treatment: the role of 12-step cognitions.
J Stud Alcohol. 2002 Nov;63(6):665-72. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2002.63.665.
10
Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous.
Addiction. 2002 Jul;97(7):891-900. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00118.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验