Suppr超能文献

医疗保险优势计划与医疗保险按服务收费相比,临终关怀出院的比例和模式。

Proportion and Patterns of Hospice Discharges in Medicare Advantage Compared to Medicare Fee-for-Service.

机构信息

1 Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.

2 Abt Associates , Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(3):302-306. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0046. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

When Medicare Advantage (MA) patients elect hospice, all covered services are reimbursed under the Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) program. This financial arrangement may incentivize MA plans to refer persons to hospice near end of life when costs of care typically rise.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize hospice discharge patterns for MA versus FFS patients and examine whether patterns differ by MA concentration across hospital referral regions (HRRs).

DESIGN AND MEASUREMENT

The rate and pattern of live discharges and length of stay (LOS) between FFS and MA patients were examined. A multivariate mixed-effects model examined whether hospice patients in MA versus FFS had differential patterns of discharges. In addition, we tested whether concentrations of MA hospice patients in a patient's HRR were associated with different patterns of discharges.

RESULTS

In fiscal year 2014, there were 1,199,533 hospice discharges with 331,142 MA patients having a slightly higher live discharge rate (15.8%) compared to 868,391 FFS hospice discharges (15.4%). After controlling for patient characteristics, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 1.01 (95% CI 0.99-1.02). MA patients were less likely to have early live discharges (AOR 0.87 95% CI 0.84-0.91) and burdensome transitions (AOR 0.61 95% CI 0.58-0.64) but did not differ in live discharges post 210 days. Among hospice deaths, MA hospice patients were less likely to have a three-day or less LOS (AOR 0.95 95% 0.94-0.96) and a LOS exceeding 180 days (AOR 0.97 95% 0.96-0.99). The concentration of MA patients in a HRR had minimal impact.

CONCLUSION

MA hospice patients' discharge patterns raised less concerns than FFS.

摘要

背景

当医疗保险优势(MA)患者选择临终关怀时,所有涵盖的服务都按照医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)计划进行报销。这种财务安排可能会激励 MA 计划在护理成本通常上升时,将人员转介到临终关怀。

目的

描述 MA 与 FFS 患者的临终关怀出院模式,并检查 MA 集中程度是否因医院转介区域(HRR)而异。

设计与测量

检查了 FFS 和 MA 患者的活出院率和住院时间(LOS)模式。使用多变量混合效应模型检查 MA 与 FFS 患者的临终关怀患者是否存在不同的出院模式。此外,我们还测试了患者 HRR 中的 MA 临终关怀患者浓度是否与不同的出院模式相关。

结果

在 2014 财年,有 1199533 例临终关怀出院,其中 331142 例 MA 患者的活出院率略高(15.8%),而 868391 例 FFS 临终关怀出院率为 15.4%。在控制了患者特征后,调整后的优势比(AOR)为 1.01(95%CI 0.99-1.02)。MA 患者不太可能出现早期活出院(AOR 0.87,95%CI 0.84-0.91)和负担过重的过渡(AOR 0.61,95%CI 0.58-0.64),但在 210 天后的活出院方面没有差异。在临终关怀死亡中,MA 临终关怀患者的三天或更短 LOS(AOR 0.95,95%CI 0.94-0.96)和超过 180 天的 LOS(AOR 0.97,95%CI 0.96-0.99)的可能性较小。HRR 中 MA 患者的集中程度影响很小。

结论

MA 临终关怀患者的出院模式比 FFS 更令人担忧。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验