Suppr超能文献

混合物理治疗干预与常规物理治疗在髋和/或膝骨关节炎患者中的成本效益比较:一项整群随机对照试验。

Cost-effectiveness of a blended physiotherapy intervention compared to usual physiotherapy in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Tranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 31;18(1):1082. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5975-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blended physiotherapy, in which physiotherapy sessions and an online application are integrated, might support patients in taking an active role in the management of their chronic condition and may reduce disease related costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a blended physiotherapy intervention (e-Exercise) compared to usual physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee, from the societal as well as the healthcare perspective.

METHODS

This economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 12-month cluster randomized controlled trial, in which 108 patients received e-Exercise, consisting of physiotherapy sessions and a web-application, and 99 patients received usual physiotherapy. Clinical outcome measures were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) according to the EuroQol (EQ-5D-3 L), physical functioning (HOOS/KOOS) and physical activity (Actigraph Accelerometer). Costs were measured using self-reported questionnaires. Missing data were multiply imputed and bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty.

RESULTS

Intervention costs and medication costs were significantly lower in e-Exercise compared to usual physiotherapy. Total societal costs and total healthcare costs did not significantly differ between groups. No significant differences in effectiveness were found between groups. For physical functioning and physical activity, the maximum probability of e-Exercise being cost-effective compared to usual physiotherapy was moderate (< 0.82) from both perspectives. For QALYs, the probability of e-Exercise being cost-effective compared to usual physiotherapy was 0.68/0.84 at a willingness to pay of 10,000 Euro and 0.70/0.80 at a willingness to pay of 80,000 Euro per gained QALY, from respectively the societal and the healthcare perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

E-Exercise itself was significantly cheaper compared to usual physiotherapy in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis, but not cost-effective from the societal- as well as healthcare perspective. The decision between both interventions can be based on the preferences of the patient and the physiotherapist.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NTR4224 (25 October 2013).

摘要

背景

混合物理疗法将物理治疗和在线应用相结合,可能会帮助患者在管理慢性疾病中发挥积极作用,并降低疾病相关成本。本研究旨在从社会和医疗保健的角度评估混合物理疗法干预(电子运动)与常规物理疗法相比在髋和/或膝关节骨关节炎患者中的成本效益。

方法

本经济评估是在一项为期 12 个月的群组随机对照试验中进行的,其中 108 名患者接受了电子运动治疗,包括物理治疗和网络应用,99 名患者接受了常规物理治疗。临床结局测量采用欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-3L)、健康调查简表/膝关节骨关节炎(HOOS/KOOS)和身体活动(加速度计)评估的健康调整生命年(QALY)。使用自我报告问卷测量成本。缺失数据采用多重插补法,采用自举法估计统计不确定性。

结果

电子运动治疗的干预成本和药物成本明显低于常规物理治疗。两组总社会成本和总医疗保健成本无显著差异。两组之间的疗效无显著差异。对于身体功能和身体活动,从社会和医疗保健的角度来看,电子运动治疗比常规物理治疗更具成本效益的最大概率为中度(<0.82)。对于 QALY,电子运动治疗比常规物理治疗更具成本效益的概率为 0.68/0.84,在支付意愿为 10000 欧元和 0.70/0.80 欧元时,每获得一个 QALY,从社会和医疗保健的角度来看,分别为 0.84。

结论

与常规物理疗法相比,电子运动治疗本身在髋和/或膝关节骨关节炎患者中明显更便宜,但从社会和医疗保健的角度来看并不具有成本效益。两种干预措施的选择可以基于患者和物理治疗师的偏好。

试验注册

NTR4224(2013 年 10 月 25 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c0/6119267/93cbc7553d75/12889_2018_5975_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验