• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国低危和中危前列腺癌管理的国家趋势。

National trends in the management of low and intermediate risk prostate cancer in the United States.

机构信息

Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.111. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.111
PMID:25106900
Abstract

PURPOSE

To our knowledge factors affecting the adoption of noncurative initial management in the United States for low risk prostate cancer on a population based level are unknown. We measured temporal trends in the proportion of patients with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer who elected noncurative initial treatment in the United States and analyzed the association of factors affecting management choice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 465,591 and 237,257 men diagnosed with low or intermediate risk prostate cancer using NCDB and SEER (2004 to 2010), respectively. We measured the proportion of men who elected noncurative initial treatment and used multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate factors affecting the treatment choice.

RESULTS

During the study period noncurative initial management increased in patients at low risk from 21% to 32% in SEER and from 13% to 20% in NCDB (each p < 0.001). This increase was not reflected in our overall study population (SEER 20% to 22% and NCDB 11% to 13%) since the proportion of patients with Gleason score 6 or less decreased with time (61% to 49% and 61% to 45%, respectively). From 2004 to 2010 older age, lower prostate specific antigen, earlier clinical stage, increased comorbidity index and not being married were associated with a higher likelihood of noncurative initial management (each p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Two independently managed, population based data sets confirmed a temporal increase in noncurative initial management in patients with low risk PCa that did not translate into greater use overall in those at low and intermediate risk combined. These contrasting results are likely due to grade migration resulting in fewer men being classified as with low risk PCa based on Gleason score.

摘要

目的

据我们所知,在美国,基于人群水平,影响低危前列腺癌患者采用非治愈性初始治疗的因素尚不清楚。我们测量了美国低危和中危前列腺癌患者选择非治愈性初始治疗的比例随时间的变化趋势,并分析了影响管理选择的因素。

材料和方法

我们使用 NCDB 和 SEER(2004 年至 2010 年)分别确定了 465591 名和 237257 名低危或中危前列腺癌患者。我们测量了选择非治愈性初始治疗的男性比例,并使用多变量逻辑回归分析评估影响治疗选择的因素。

结果

在研究期间,SEER 中低危患者的非治愈性初始管理比例从 21%增加到 32%,NCDB 中从 13%增加到 20%(均 p <0.001)。但我们的总体研究人群中并未反映出这种增加(SEER 为 20%至 22%,NCDB 为 11%至 13%),因为随着时间的推移,Gleason 评分 6 或更低的患者比例下降(分别为 61%至 49%和 61%至 45%)。2004 年至 2010 年,年龄较大、前列腺特异性抗原较低、较早的临床分期、合并症指数增加和未婚与非治愈性初始管理的可能性更高相关(均 p <0.05)。

结论

两个独立管理的基于人群的数据集证实了低危 PCa 患者非治愈性初始治疗的时间增加,但在低危和中危合并患者中总体使用并未增加。这些对比结果可能是由于基于 Gleason 评分,低危 PCa 患者的数量减少导致分级迁移。

相似文献

1
National trends in the management of low and intermediate risk prostate cancer in the United States.美国低危和中危前列腺癌管理的国家趋势。
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.111. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
2
Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.基于人群的研究:低危和中危前列腺癌采用主动监测和观察等待的使用情况及其决定因素。
J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1742-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.054. Epub 2013 May 30.
3
Time trends and characteristics of men choosing watchful waiting for initial treatment of localized prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.选择观察等待作为局限性前列腺癌初始治疗方法的男性患者的时间趋势及特征:来自CaPSURE的结果
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1804-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091641.34674.11.
4
Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.低危或中危局部前列腺癌初始期待管理患者的结局。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1672-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11434.x. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
5
Temporal trends in the number of men electing for conservative management for low-risk prostate cancer in the United States.美国低危前列腺癌男性选择保守治疗人数的时间趋势。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Dec;23(4):714-717. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0252-0. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.局限性前列腺癌的治疗:根据其自然病程(通常进展相对缓慢),可选择观察等待、手术或放射治疗。
Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8.
7
National trends in the management of low-risk prostate cancer: analyzing the impact of Medicaid expansion in the United States.国家层面低危前列腺癌管理的趋势:分析美国医疗补助扩展计划的影响。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Sep;52(9):1611-1615. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02463-5. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
8
Temporarily deferred therapy (watchful waiting) for men younger than 70 years and with low-risk localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era.在前列腺特异性抗原时代,对70岁以下且患有低风险局限性前列腺癌的男性进行暂时延迟治疗(观察等待)。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 1;21(21):4001-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.092.
9
Incidence of initial local therapy among men with lower-risk prostate cancer in the United States.美国低风险前列腺癌男性患者初始局部治疗的发生率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Aug 16;98(16):1134-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj308.
10
Bias due to missing SEER data in D'Amico risk stratification of prostate cancer.由于 SEER 数据缺失导致 D'Amico 前列腺癌风险分层存在偏倚。
J Urol. 2012 Jun;187(6):2026-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.070. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Referral Network Increases Physicians' Adoption of Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Using SEER-Medicare.转诊网络增加了医生对局限性前列腺癌采用主动监测的比例:一项使用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库-医疗保险数据的横断面研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251342466. doi: 10.1177/00469580251342466. Epub 2025 May 31.
2
Lethal Prostate Cancer in Mexico: Data from the Can.Prost Mexican Registry and a Project for Early Detection.墨西哥的致命性前列腺癌:来自Can.Prost墨西哥登记处的数据及早期检测项目
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 30;16(21):3675. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213675.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Microsimulation of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance of Localized Prostate Cancer.
成本效益分析和基于微模拟的前列腺癌局部主动监测中序列多参数磁共振成像的应用。
J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):80-89. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002490. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
4
Trends and practices for managing low-risk prostate cancer: a SEER-Medicare study.管理低危前列腺癌的趋势和实践:一项 SEER-Medicare 研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Mar;25(1):100-108. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00393-6. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
5
Trends in treatments for prostate cancer in the United States, 2010-2015.2010 - 2015年美国前列腺癌治疗趋势
Am J Cancer Res. 2021 May 20;11(5):2351-2368. eCollection 2021.
6
Time Trends in Use of Radical Prostatectomy by Tumor Risk and Life Expectancy in a National Veterans Affairs Cohort.全国退伍军人事务队列中,按肿瘤风险和预期寿命分层的根治性前列腺切除术的时间趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112214. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12214.
7
Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6.前列腺癌中危,活检 Gleason 评分为 6 分。
BMC Urol. 2021 Apr 5;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00827-2.
8
Real-world Evidence to Estimate Prostate Cancer Costs for First-line Treatment or Active Surveillance.用于估算一线治疗或主动监测前列腺癌成本的真实世界证据。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Jan;23:20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
9
Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study.为什么患有低危前列腺癌的男性选择并坚持接受主动监测:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 20;14(11):e0225134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225134. eCollection 2019.
10
Contemporary prostate cancer treatment choices in multidisciplinary clinics referenced to national trends.多学科诊所中参考国家趋势的当代前列腺癌治疗选择。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;126(3):506-514. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32570. Epub 2019 Nov 19.