• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

客观结构化临床考试与传统临床考试:对尼日利亚一所医学院学生认知与偏好的评估

Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination: An evaluation of students' perception and preference in a Nigerian medical school.

作者信息

Ameh Nkeiruka, Abdul Mohammed A, Adesiyun Gbadebo A, Avidime Solomon

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria.

出版信息

Niger Med J. 2014 Jul;55(4):310-3. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.137191.

DOI:10.4103/0300-1652.137191
PMID:25114366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4124544/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Method of testing clinical competence of medical students in this setting has been controversial. This report evaluates the perceptions and preferences of 5(th) and 6(th) year medical students about traditional clinical examination (TCE) and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study using a structured questionnaire, administered to 156 students, who had been previously exposed to TCE and OSCE.

RESULTS

There were 110 (70.5%) males and 46 (29.5%) females, with median age group of 26-30 years. One hundred and thirty-one respondents (84%) felt TCE is more difficult and 20 (12.8%) felt OSCE was more difficult. One hundred and forty-two (91%) felt OSCE was easier to pass, 8 (5.1%) felt TCE was easier to pass and 6 (3.8%) were undecided. Majority of the 5(th) and 6(th) year students (95.5% and 100%, respectively) preferred OSCE for assessment. In relation to validity and reliability of OSCE, 124 (79.5%) of all the students felt it provides a true measure of essential clinical skills, 130 (83.3%) felt its scores are standardised, 143 (91.7%) felt it is a practical and useful experience and 135 (86.5%) felt students' personality, ethnicity and gender will not affect OSCE scores. Overall, there were no significant differences in preference and perceptions between 5(th) and 6(th) year students and between males and females.

CONCLUSION

Students preferred OSCE as method of assessing clinical competence and considered it a more valid and reliable method of examination.

摘要

背景

在这种情况下,医学生临床能力的测试方法一直存在争议。本报告评估了五年级和六年级医学生对传统临床考试(TCE)和客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的看法和偏好。

材料与方法

采用结构化问卷进行横断面研究,对156名曾参加过TCE和OSCE的学生进行调查。

结果

有110名(70.5%)男性和46名(29.5%)女性,年龄中位数在26 - 30岁之间。131名受访者(84%)认为TCE更难,20名(12.8%)认为OSCE更难。142名(91%)认为OSCE更容易通过,8名(5.1%)认为TCE更容易通过,6名(3.8%)未作决定。五年级和六年级的大多数学生(分别为95.5%和100%)更喜欢用OSCE进行评估。关于OSCE的有效性和可靠性,所有学生中有124名(79.5%)认为它能真实衡量基本临床技能,130名(83.3%)认为其分数是标准化的,143名(91.7%)认为它是一次实用且有益的体验,135名(86.5%)认为学生的个性、种族和性别不会影响OSCE分数。总体而言,五年级和六年级学生之间以及男性和女性之间在偏好和看法上没有显著差异。

结论

学生更喜欢用OSCE作为评估临床能力的方法,并认为它是一种更有效、更可靠的考试方法。

相似文献

1
Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination: An evaluation of students' perception and preference in a Nigerian medical school.客观结构化临床考试与传统临床考试:对尼日利亚一所医学院学生认知与偏好的评估
Niger Med J. 2014 Jul;55(4):310-3. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.137191.
2
Medical students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement.医学生对客观结构化临床考试的认知:用于改进流程的反馈
J Surg Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;71(5):701-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
3
Final year MBBS students' perception for observed structured clinical examination.医学学士最后一年学生对客观结构化临床考试的看法。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Jan;23(1):20-4.
4
Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination to evaluate students' clinical competence: A systematic review of nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences.客观结构化临床考试与传统临床考试评估学生临床能力的比较:护理教师和学生感知与经验的系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105170. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105170. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
Perception of pharmacy students in Malaysia on the use of objective structured clinical examinations to evaluate competence.马来西亚药学专业学生对使用客观结构化临床考试评估能力的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Dec 15;71(6):118. doi: 10.5688/aj7106118.
6
Clinical Examination among Medical Students: Assessment and Comparison of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Objective Structured Clinical Examination and Conventional Examination.医学生的临床检查:客观结构化临床考试与传统考试优缺点的评估与比较
Niger J Surg. 2019 Jul-Dec;25(2):208-212. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_16_19.
7
Student and Faculty Perception of Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Teaching Hospital Experience.学生和教师对客观结构化临床考试的认知:一家教学医院的经验
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2017 Jan-Apr;5(1):49-55. doi: 10.4103/1658-631X.194250. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
Dental students' perception of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): The Taibah University experience, Almadinah Almunawwarah, KSA.牙科学生对客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的认知:沙特阿拉伯麦地那泰巴大学的经验
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2017 Nov 21;13(1):64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.09.002. eCollection 2018 Feb.
9
An evaluative study of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): students and examiners perspectives.客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的评估性研究:学生和考官的视角
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Jun 5;10:387-397. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S197275. eCollection 2019.
10
Clinical skills assessment: limitations to the introduction of an "OSCE" (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) in a traditional Brazilian medical school.临床技能评估:在巴西一所传统医学院引入“客观结构化临床考试”(OSCE)的局限性。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2004 Jan 8;122(1):12-7. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802004000100004. Epub 2004 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Objective Structured Clinical Examination Perception Scale (OSCEPS) for Health Sciences Students: A Psychometric Evaluation Study.健康科学专业学生客观结构化临床考试感知量表(OSCEPS):一项心理计量学评估研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2024 Dec;26(4):e13188. doi: 10.1111/nhs.13188.
2
Use of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in a hybrid digital / in-person training for hormonal IUD in Nigeria: findings and applications of the approach.客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)在尼日利亚激素宫内节育器数字化/面对面混合培训中的应用:该方法的研究结果与应用
Gates Open Res. 2023 Sep 12;7:120. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.14695.1. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Critiques on the Objective Structured Clinical Examination.对客观结构化临床考试的批判
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2005 Sep;34(8):478-82.
2
Student evaluation of an OSCE in paediatrics at the University of the West Indies, Jamaica.牙买加西印度群岛大学儿科学客观结构化临床考试的学生评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2004 Oct 16;4:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-4-22.
3
Use of Video-Projected Structured Clinical Examination (ViPSCE) instead of the traditional oral (Viva) examination in the assessment of final year medical students.在评估医学专业最后一年学生时,使用视频投影结构化临床考试(ViPSCE)代替传统口试(Viva)。
An Assessment of the Correlation between Tests of Clinical Competence and Tests of Cognitive Knowledge amongst Nigerian Resident Doctors in Surgery.
尼日利亚外科住院医生临床能力测试与认知知识测试之间的相关性评估。
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2020 Apr-Jun;10(2):12-16. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_45_21. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
4
Perception of Students and Examiners about Objective Structured Clinical Examination in a Teaching Hospital in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚一家教学医院的学生和考官对客观结构化临床考试的看法。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Dec 11;12:1439-1448. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S342582. eCollection 2021.
5
Experience and Challenges of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): Perspective of Students and Examiners in a Clinical Department of Ethiopian University.客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的经验与挑战:来自埃塞俄比亚大学临床系学生和考官的视角。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020 May;30(3):417-426. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v30i3.13.
6
Clinical Examination among Medical Students: Assessment and Comparison of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Objective Structured Clinical Examination and Conventional Examination.医学生的临床检查:客观结构化临床考试与传统考试优缺点的评估与比较
Niger J Surg. 2019 Jul-Dec;25(2):208-212. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_16_19.
7
A COMPARISON OF THE OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION AND THE TRADITIONAL ORAL CLINICAL EXAMINATION IN A NIGERIAN UNIVERSITY.尼日利亚一所大学中客观结构化临床考试与传统口试的比较
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3):59-72.
8
The Barriers and Challenges of Applying New Strategies in the Clinical Evaluation of Nursing Students from the Viewpoints of Clinical Teachers.从临床教师角度看护理专业学生临床评估中应用新策略的障碍与挑战
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 Jul-Aug;23(4):305-310. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_17_17.
9
Is Cronbach's alpha sufficient for assessing the reliability of the OSCE for an internal medicine course?克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's alpha)是否足以评估内科课程客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的可靠性?
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 19;8:582. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1533-x.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004 Mar;17(1):17-26. doi: 10.1080/13576280310001656123.
4
Assessing nurse practitioner students using a modified objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).使用改良的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)对执业护士学生进行评估。
Nurse Educ Today. 2001 Oct;21(7):541-50. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2001.0590.
5
Assessment of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for undergraduate students in accident and emergency medicine.针对本科医学生的急诊医学客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评估
J Accid Emerg Med. 1994 Dec;11(4):223-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.11.4.223.
6
Student attitudes towards the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and conventional methods of assessment.学生对客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)及传统评估方法的态度。
S Afr Med J. 1983 Sep 10;64(11):390-4.
7
Objective structured clinical examination compared with other forms of student assessment.客观结构化临床考试与其他形式的学生评估比较。
Arch Dis Child. 1984 Dec;59(12):1173-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.59.12.1173.
8
Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评估临床能力。
Med Educ. 1979 Jan;13(1):41-54.