Suppr超能文献

客观结构化临床考试与其他形式的学生评估比较。

Objective structured clinical examination compared with other forms of student assessment.

作者信息

Smith L J, Price D A, Houston I B

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 1984 Dec;59(12):1173-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.59.12.1173.

Abstract

Two hundred and twenty nine final year medical students were assessed in paediatrics using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and a traditional viva voce examination, and the results were compared with other assessments of the students made during and at the end of the undergraduate course. Results of the OSCE correlated positively with other forms of assessment and more strongly than the viva voce examination. There was little correlation between the OSCE and viva results. Eighty per cent of students felt the OSCE to be a fairer system than other examinations and all external examiners commented favourably on it. An OSCE is an acceptable alternative to traditional means of examination in paediatrics and may be superior in certain aspects.

摘要

采用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)和传统口试对229名医学专业最后一年的学生进行儿科评估,并将结果与本科课程期间及结束时对学生的其他评估进行比较。OSCE的结果与其他评估形式呈正相关,且比口试的相关性更强。OSCE和口试结果之间几乎没有相关性。80%的学生认为OSCE比其他考试更公平,所有外部考官对此都给予了好评。OSCE是儿科传统考试方式的一种可接受的替代方法,在某些方面可能更具优势。

相似文献

3
Evaluation of an objective structured clinical examination.客观结构化临床考试的评估
Arch Dis Child. 1982 May;57(5):390-2. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.5.390.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验