Suppr超能文献

威尔士健康改善支出的国家计划预算与边际分析(PBMA):一生的撤资与再投资

A national Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) of health improvement spending across Wales: disinvestment and reinvestment across the life course.

作者信息

Edwards Rhiannon Tudor, Charles Joanna M, Thomas Sara, Bishop Julie, Cohen David, Groves Sam, Humphreys Ciaran, Howson Helen, Bradley Peter

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics & Medicines Evaluation, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 12;14:837. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-837.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wales faces serious public health challenges, with relatively low life expectancies and wide inequalities in life expectancy with associated pressures on the National Health Service (NHS) at a time of financial recession. This has led to growing recognition of the need to better understand the range of health improvement and prevention programmes across Welsh Government, NHS, local government and voluntary sector agencies.

METHODS

The Minister for Health and Social Care commissioned Public Health Wales, the single national public health organisation, to establish a Health Improvement Advisory Group, to oversee a Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) expert panel. The panel drew on evidence from a range of sources to explore potential alternative modes of health improvement initiative delivery across Wales. Electronic voting was used to agree an appropriate time horizon for health improvement programme outcomes, main objective of the health improvement review and criteria for evaluating candidate services for disinvestment and investment. The panel also used electronic voting to state whether they wished to disinvest or invest in a candidate service.

RESULTS

The review identified a budget of £15.1 million, spanning 10 Welsh Government priority areas, and 6 life course stages. Due to lack of evidence the panel recommended total disinvestment in 7 out of 25 initiatives releasing £1.5 million of resources, and partial disinvestment in a further 3 interventions releasing £7.3 million of resources. The panel did not recommend increasing investment in any of the 25 initiatives under review. Marginal analyses prioritised child health, mental health and wellbeing and tobacco control as key areas for investment.

CONCLUSIONS

Wales is championing a concept of "prudent healthcare". The PBMA exercise undertaken here was a transparent evidence-based tool to reach decisions about potential for disinvestment and reinvestment in health improvement strategies. It also demonstrates the potential wider application at a national level across government public health functions, to ensure resources are most cost-effectively deployed, with due consideration for equity.

摘要

背景

威尔士面临严峻的公共卫生挑战,预期寿命相对较低,预期寿命存在巨大不平等,在财政衰退时期给国民医疗服务体系(NHS)带来了相关压力。这使得人们越来越认识到有必要更好地了解威尔士政府、国民医疗服务体系、地方政府和志愿部门机构开展的一系列健康改善和预防项目。

方法

卫生和社会关怀部长委托威尔士唯一的国家公共卫生组织威尔士公共卫生部门成立一个健康改善咨询小组,以监督一个项目预算和边际分析(PBMA)专家小组。该小组借鉴了一系列来源的证据,以探索威尔士各地健康改善倡议实施的潜在替代模式。采用电子投票的方式来商定健康改善项目成果的适当时间范围、健康改善审查的主要目标以及评估候选服务进行撤资和投资的标准。该小组还通过电子投票表明他们是否希望对候选服务进行撤资或投资。

结果

审查确定了1510万英镑的预算,涵盖威尔士政府的10个优先领域和6个生命历程阶段。由于缺乏证据,该小组建议对25项举措中的7项完全撤资,释放150万英镑的资源,并对另外3项干预措施部分撤资,释放730万英镑的资源。该小组不建议增加对所审查的25项举措中的任何一项的投资。边际分析将儿童健康、心理健康和福祉以及烟草控制列为关键投资领域。

结论

威尔士正在倡导“审慎医疗保健”的理念。这里进行的项目预算和边际分析是一种基于证据的透明工具,用于就健康改善战略中的撤资和再投资潜力做出决策。它还展示了在国家层面跨政府公共卫生职能更广泛应用的潜力,以确保资源得到最具成本效益的配置,并适当考虑公平性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/4246570/9294479e4f23/12889_2014_7286_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验