Suppr超能文献

英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)牙科服务中的资源分配:社会偏好识别(RAINDROP):研究方案

Resource allocation in NHS dentistry: recognition of societal preferences (RAINDROP): study protocol.

作者信息

Vernazza Christopher R, Carr Katherine, Wildman John, Gray Joanne, Holmes Richard D, Exley Catherine, Smith Robert A, Donaldson Cam

机构信息

Centre for Oral Health Research, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BW, UK.

Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle University, Room 7.20, 7th Floor, 5 Barrack Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4SE, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3302-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resources in any healthcare systems are scarce relative to need and therefore choices need to be made which often involve difficult decisions about the best allocation of these resources. One pragmatic and robust tool to aid resource allocation is Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA), but there is mixed evidence on its uptake and effectiveness. Furthermore, there is also no evidence on the incorporation of the preferences of a large and representative sample of the general public into such a process. The study therefore aims to undertake, evaluate and refine a PBMA process within the exemplar of NHS dentistry in England whilst also using an established methodology (Willingness to Pay (WTP)) to systematically gather views from a representative sample of the public.

METHODS

Stakeholders including service buyers (commissioners), dentists, dental public health representatives and patient representatives will be recruited to participate in a PBMA process involving defining current spend, agreeing criteria to judge services/interventions, defining areas for investment and disinvestment, rating these areas against the criteria and making final recommendations. The process will be refined based on participatory action research principles and evaluated through semi-structured interviews, focus groups and observation of the process by the research team. In parallel a representative sample of English adults will be recruited to complete a series of four surveys including WTP valuations of programmes being considered by the PBMA panel. In addition a methodological experiment comparing two ways of eliciting WTP will be undertaken.

DISCUSSION

The project will allow the PBMA process and particularly the use of WTP within it to be investigated and developed. There will be challenges around engagement with the task by the panel undertaking it and with the outputs by stakeholders but careful relationship building will help to mitigate this. The large volume of data will be managed through careful segmenting of the analysis and the use of the well-established Framework approach to qualitative data analysis. WTP has various potential biases but the elicitation will be carefully designed to minimise these and some methodological investigation will take place.

摘要

背景

相对于需求而言,任何医疗保健系统中的资源都是稀缺的,因此需要做出选择,而这些选择往往涉及到关于这些资源最佳分配的艰难决策。一种实用且强大的资源分配辅助工具是项目预算编制与边际分析(PBMA),但其采用情况和有效性的证据不一。此外,也没有证据表明将大量具有代表性的普通公众的偏好纳入了这一过程。因此,本研究旨在在英格兰国民保健服务(NHS)牙科的范例中开展、评估和完善PBMA流程,同时使用既定方法(支付意愿(WTP))系统地收集公众代表性样本的意见。

方法

将招募包括服务购买者(专员)、牙医、牙科公共卫生代表和患者代表在内的利益相关者参与PBMA流程,该流程包括确定当前支出、商定判断服务/干预措施的标准、确定投资和撤资领域、根据标准对这些领域进行评级并提出最终建议。该流程将根据参与式行动研究原则进行完善,并通过半结构化访谈、焦点小组以及研究团队对该流程的观察进行评估。与此同时,将招募具有代表性的英国成年人样本,以完成一系列四项调查,包括对PBMA小组正在考虑的项目进行WTP估值。此外,还将进行一项方法学实验,比较两种引出WTP的方式。

讨论

该项目将使PBMA流程,特别是其中WTP的使用得到研究和发展。在让执行该任务的小组参与任务以及让利益相关者接受产出方面会存在挑战,但精心建立关系将有助于缓解这一问题。大量数据将通过仔细划分分析以及使用成熟的定性数据分析框架方法进行管理。WTP存在各种潜在偏差,但引出过程将经过精心设计以尽量减少这些偏差,并将进行一些方法学研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f3/6013861/b994cce8902c/12913_2018_3302_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验