Suppr超能文献

美国新世纪(2001 年至 2010 年)期间美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、黑人和非西班牙裔白人间的结直肠癌筛查实践。

United States colorectal cancer screening practices among American Indians/Alaska Natives, blacks, and non-Hispanic whites in the new millennium (2001 to 2010).

机构信息

Research for Indigenous Community Health (RICH) Center, College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice, and Pharmaceutical Sciences/Social and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota.

出版信息

Cancer. 2014 Oct 15;120(20):3192-299. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28855. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to describe, examine, and compare prevalence estimates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening practices and to determine whether disparities exist for American Indians/Alaska Natives (AIANs) and blacks compared with whites.

METHODS

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2001-2010) data from respondents aged ≥ 50 years (n = 356,073) were used. The primary outcome was self-reported CRC screening according to US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for endoscopy (colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy), fecal occult blood test (FOBT), or mixed screening (endoscopy or FOBT).

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2010, endoscopy screening increased in the AIAN population by 44.8% (P < .001) compared with black respondents (51.7%) and white respondents (26.5%). AIANs were less likely to report endoscopy screening (45%) compared with both blacks (56%) and whites (55%). For mixed CRC screenings, AIAN rates increased by 34.5%, compared with 29.7% for blacks and 15% for whites. In 2010, AIANs (51%) had the lowest prevalence of mixed CRC screening compared with blacks (61%) and whites (60%; P < .001). Factors that enabled health care attenuated the lowered likelihood of CRC screenings, but disparities remained for AIAN CRC screening. In contrast, once enabling factors were controlled, the odds ratios of CRC screening among blacks were higher compared with whites.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2001 and 2010, AIANs had the lowest CRC screening rates in the United States compared with blacks and whites, presenting a CRC disparity, as rigorously defined. The current findings indicate that, although considerable progress has been made to increase CRC screening for blacks and whites, progress for AIANs continues to lag behind in the first decade of 21st century.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在描述、检查并比较美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)和非裔美国人与白人之间结直肠癌(CRC)筛查实践的流行率估计,并确定是否存在差异。

方法

利用 2001-2010 年年龄≥50 岁的行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)数据(n=356073)。主要结局指标是根据美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)内镜(结肠镜或乙状结肠镜检查)、粪便潜血试验(FOBT)或混合筛查(内镜或 FOBT)指南报告的 CRC 筛查情况。

结果

2001-2010 年,与黑人(51.7%)和白人(26.5%)相比,AIAN 人群内镜筛查率增加了 44.8%(P<.001)。与黑人和白人相比,AIAN 报告内镜筛查的可能性更小(45%)。在混合 CRC 筛查方面,AIAN 比例增加了 34.5%,而黑人增加了 29.7%,白人增加了 15%。2010 年,AIAN(51%)混合 CRC 筛查的比例最低,低于黑人(61%)和白人(60%;P<.001)。促进医疗保健的因素减弱了 CRC 筛查的可能性,但 AIAN 的 CRC 筛查仍然存在差异。相比之下,一旦控制了促进因素,黑人 CRC 筛查的优势比就高于白人。

结论

2001-2010 年,与非裔和白人相比,AIAN 的 CRC 筛查率最低,这是严格定义的 CRC 差异。目前的研究结果表明,尽管在提高黑人和白人的 CRC 筛查率方面取得了相当大的进展,但在 21 世纪的第一个十年中,AIAN 的进展仍然落后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验