文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

确定部落诊所改善结直肠癌筛查的优先事项和策略。

Identifying Priorities and Strategies for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Tribal Clinics.

机构信息

6186University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.

51166University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma, OK, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221132516. doi: 10.1177/10732748221132516.


DOI:10.1177/10732748221132516
PMID:36224082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9561646/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 3 most frequently diagnosed cancer and the 2 leading cause of cancer death in the United States (US), and incidence and mortality rates in Oklahoma are higher for many American Indian (AI) populations than other populations. The AI CRC Screening Consortium addresses major regional CRC screening disparities among AIs with shared objectives to increase CRC screening delivery and uptake in AIs aged 50 to 75 years at average risk for CRC and to assess the effectiveness of implementations of the interventions. This manuscript reports environmental scan findings related to current practices and multi-stakeholder experiences with CRC screening in two Oklahoma Indian health care systems. METHOD: We conducted a mixed methods environmental scan across five clinical sites and with multiple stakeholders to determine the scope and scale of colorectal cancer screening in two separate AI health care delivery systems in Oklahoma. Data collection consisted of a mixture of individual interviews and group discussions at an urban site, and four clinical care sites within a tribal health system. RESULTS: Sixty-two individuals completed interviews. Data from these interviews will inform the development of evidence-based intervention strategies to increase provider delivery, community access to, and community priority for CRC screening in diverse AI health care delivery systems. Conversations with patients, providers, and clinical leadership point to individual and system-level opportunities for improvement at each site, shaped in part by differences in the delivery of services, structure of the health care system, and capacity to implement new intervention strategies. The thematic areas most central to the process of evidenced-based intervention development included: current practices, needs and recommendations, and CRC site priorities. CONCLUSION: Environmental scan data indicated clear opportunities for individual and system-level interventions to enhance CRC screening and was critical for understanding readiness for EBI implementation at each site.

摘要

背景:在美国(US),结直肠癌(CRC)是第 3 大常见癌症,也是第 2 大癌症死因,俄克拉荷马州的许多美洲原住民(AI)人群的 CRC 发病率和死亡率都高于其他人群。AI CRC 筛查联盟旨在解决 AI 人群中存在的主要区域性 CRC 筛查差距,共同目标是提高 50 至 75 岁、CRC 平均风险的 AI 人群的 CRC 筛查率,并评估干预措施的实施效果。本报告介绍了与当前实践相关的环境扫描结果,以及在俄克拉荷马州两个印第安人医疗保健系统中 CRC 筛查的多方利益相关者经验。

方法:我们在五个临床地点和多个利益相关者中进行了混合方法环境扫描,以确定在俄克拉荷马州两个不同的 AI 医疗保健系统中 CRC 筛查的范围和规模。数据收集包括在城市地点进行的个人访谈和小组讨论,以及部落卫生系统内四个临床护理地点的混合。

结果:共有 62 人完成了访谈。这些访谈的数据将为制定循证干预策略提供信息,以增加提供者的服务提供、社区获得和不同 AI 医疗保健系统中社区对 CRC 筛查的重视。与患者、提供者和临床领导层的对话指出了每个地点在个人和系统层面上的改进机会,部分原因是服务提供、医疗保健系统结构和实施新干预策略的能力存在差异。与循证干预措施发展过程最相关的主题领域包括:当前实践、需求和建议以及 CRC 地点的优先事项。

结论:环境扫描数据表明,有明确的机会进行个人和系统层面的干预,以加强 CRC 筛查,这对于了解每个地点实施 EBI 的准备情况至关重要。

相似文献

[1]
Identifying Priorities and Strategies for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Tribal Clinics.

Cancer Control. 2022

[2]
Participatory action research to develop and implement multicomponent, multilevel strategies for implementing colorectal cancer screening interventions in American Indian communities in New Mexico.

Implement Sci Commun. 2024-5-10

[3]
Strategic use of resources to enhance colorectal cancer screening for patients with diabetes (SURE: CRC4D) in federally qualified health centers: a protocol for hybrid type ii effectiveness-implementation trial.

BMC Prim Care. 2024-7-5

[4]
Use of Evidence-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening.

MMWR Suppl. 2016-2-12

[5]
Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Among Cancer Control Program Grantees, 2009-2015.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2019-10-10

[6]
Text message reminders increased colorectal cancer screening in a randomized trial with Alaska Native and American Indian people.

Cancer. 2017-4-15

[7]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[8]
Supporting ColoREctal Equitable Navigation (SCREEN): a protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial for patient navigation in primary care.

Implement Sci Commun. 2024-6-3

[9]
Understanding the processes that Federally Qualified Health Centers use to select and implement colorectal cancer screening interventions: a qualitative study.

Transl Behav Med. 2020-5-20

[10]
Elevated colorectal cancer incidence among American Indian/Alaska Native persons in Alaska compared to other populations worldwide.

Int J Circumpolar Health. 2023-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
RADAR-ES: A Methodological Framework for Conducting Environmental Scans in Health Services Delivery Research.

J Prim Care Community Health. 2025

[2]
A study protocol for a mixed-method environmental scan of contextual factors that influence lung cancer screening adherence.

Implement Sci Commun. 2024-11-6

[3]
Harmonizing data across the accelerating colorectal cancer screening and follow-up through implementation science (ACCSIS) program to enhance data quality and promote data sharing.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-11-6

[4]
Indigenizing and Ruralizing NCI Screen to Save Program: Resources, Optimizing Outreach, Teaching, Science (ROOTS).

J Cancer Educ. 2024-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2020-3-5

[2]
The use of the environmental scan in health services delivery research: a scoping review protocol.

BMJ Open. 2019-9-6

[3]
Cancer statistics, 2019.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2019-1-8

[4]
Opportunities and Challenges in Moving From Current Guidelines to Personalized Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Gastroenterology. 2019-3

[5]
Multilevel Small-Area Estimation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018-3

[6]
Updated Review of Prevalence of Major Risk Factors and Use of Screening Tests for Cancer in the United States.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017-8

[7]
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2017-3-1

[8]
Screening for Colorectal Neoplasia.

N Engl J Med. 2017-1-12

[9]
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

JAMA. 2016-6-21

[10]
Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: a randomized trial in safety-net clinics.

Am J Prev Med. 2014-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索