• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模中的人为因素:丹麦、芬兰和加拿大在迈向健康信息系统可用性的区域和国家评估方面的经验。IMIA人为因素工作组的贡献。

Human Factors in the Large: Experiences from Denmark, Finland and Canada in Moving Towards Regional and National Evaluations of Health Information System Usability. Contribution of the IMIA Human Factors Working Group.

作者信息

Kushniruk A, Kaipio J, Nieminen M, Hyppönen H, Lääveri T, Nohr C, Kanstrup A M, Berg Christiansen M, Kuo M-H, Borycki E

机构信息

Andre Kushniruk, School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada, E-mail:

出版信息

Yearb Med Inform. 2014 Aug 15;9(1):67-81. doi: 10.15265/IY-2014-0023.

DOI:10.15265/IY-2014-0023
PMID:25123725
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4287074/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this paper is to explore approaches to understanding the usability of health information systems at regional and national levels.

METHODS

Several different methods are discussed in case studies from Denmark, Finland and Canada. They range from small scale qualitative studies involving usability testing of systems to larger scale national level questionnaire studies aimed at assessing the use and usability of health information systems by entire groups of health professionals.

RESULTS

It was found that regional and national usability studies can complement smaller scale usability studies, and that they are needed in order to understand larger trends regarding system usability. Despite adoption of EHRs, many health professionals rate the usability of the systems as low. A range of usability issues have been noted when data is collected on a large scale through use of widely distributed questionnaires and websites designed to monitor user perceptions of usability.

CONCLUSION

As health information systems are deployed on a widespread basis, studies that examine systems used regionally or nationally are required. In addition, collection of large scale data on the usability of specific IT products is needed in order to complement smaller scale studies of specific systems.

摘要

目标

本文的目标是探索在区域和国家层面理解健康信息系统可用性的方法。

方法

在丹麦、芬兰和加拿大的案例研究中讨论了几种不同的方法。这些方法从小规模的定性研究(涉及系统的可用性测试)到大规模的国家级问卷调查研究不等,后者旨在评估全体卫生专业人员对健康信息系统的使用情况和可用性。

结果

研究发现,区域和国家层面的可用性研究可以补充小规模的可用性研究,并且为了理解有关系统可用性的更大趋势,这类研究是必要的。尽管采用了电子健康记录,但许多卫生专业人员对系统可用性的评价较低。当通过广泛分发的问卷和旨在监测用户对可用性感知的网站大规模收集数据时,已经注意到一系列可用性问题。

结论

随着健康信息系统的广泛部署,需要开展针对区域或国家层面使用的系统的研究。此外,为了补充对特定系统的小规模研究,需要收集有关特定信息技术产品可用性的大规模数据。

相似文献

1
Human Factors in the Large: Experiences from Denmark, Finland and Canada in Moving Towards Regional and National Evaluations of Health Information System Usability. Contribution of the IMIA Human Factors Working Group.大规模中的人为因素:丹麦、芬兰和加拿大在迈向健康信息系统可用性的区域和国家评估方面的经验。IMIA人为因素工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2014 Aug 15;9(1):67-81. doi: 10.15265/IY-2014-0023.
2
Comparing approaches to measuring the adoption and usability of electronic health records: lessons learned from Canada, Denmark and Finland.比较电子健康记录采用率和可用性的测量方法:从加拿大、丹麦和芬兰汲取的经验教训。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:367-71.
3
Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.可用性问题不会自行解决:芬兰医生使用电子健康记录的全国性调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:266-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Physicians' and nurses' experiences on EHR usability: Comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand.医生和护士在电子健康记录可用性方面的体验:按就业部门和系统品牌划分的专业群体之间的比较。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Feb;134:104018. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104018. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
5
Health information exchange in Finland: Usage of different access types and predictors of paper use.芬兰的健康信息交换:不同访问类型的使用情况和纸张使用的预测因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Feb;122:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
6
National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.全国临床信息学技术系统调查问卷研究证明:医生深受可用性差之苦。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Oct;80(10):708-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
7
Usability Methods for Ensuring Health Information Technology Safety: Evidence-Based Approaches. Contribution of the IMIA Working Group Health Informatics for Patient Safety.确保健康信息技术安全的可用性方法:循证方法。国际医学信息学会患者安全健康信息学工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:20-7.
8
Integrating heuristic evaluation with cognitive walkthrough: development of a hybrid usability inspection method.将启发式评估与认知走查相结合:一种混合可用性检查方法的开发。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;208:221-5.
9
User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland.用户在芬兰不同地区卫生信息交换系统中的体验。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jan;83(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
10
Usability Across Health Information Technology Systems: Searching for Commonalities and Consistency.跨健康信息技术系统的可用性:寻找共性与一致性
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:649-653. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190303.

引用本文的文献

1
Human factors in healthcare IT: Management considerations and trends.医疗信息技术中的人为因素:管理注意事项和趋势。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2023 Mar;36(2):72-78. doi: 10.1177/08404704221139219. Epub 2022 Nov 27.
2
Human Factors for More Usable and Safer Health Information Technology: Where Are We Now and Where do We Go from Here?提升健康信息技术可用性与安全性的人为因素:我们现状如何,未来何去何从?
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):120-125. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-024.
3
An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review.通过系统评价对已发表的电子健康记录可用性评估进行评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):218-226. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw046. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
4
Usability Testing of an HPV Information Website for Parents and Adolescents.面向家长和青少年的人乳头瘤病毒信息网站的可用性测试
Online J Commun Media Technol. 2015 Oct;5(4):184-203.

本文引用的文献

1
Nordic eHealth indicators: organisation of research, first results and plan for the future.北欧电子健康指标:研究组织、初步成果及未来计划
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:273-7.
2
Finnish physicians' experiences with computer-supported patient information exchange and communication in clinical work.芬兰医生在临床工作中使用计算机支持的患者信息交换和沟通的经验。
Int J Electron Healthc. 2011;6(2-4):153-73. doi: 10.1504/IJEH.2011.044347.
3
Physicians' experiences of participation in healthcare IT development in Finland: willing but not able.芬兰医生参与医疗信息技术开发的经验:愿意但力不从心。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Feb;81(2):98-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
4
National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.全国临床信息学技术系统调查问卷研究证明:医生深受可用性差之苦。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Oct;80(10):708-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
5
Increasing the safety of healthcare information systems through improved procurement: toward a framework for selection of safe healthcare systems.通过改进采购提高医疗保健信息系统的安全性:迈向安全医疗保健系统选择框架
Healthc Q. 2010;13 Spec No:53-8. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2010.21967.
6
Towards a National Health Information System evaluation.迈向国家卫生信息系统评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 2):1216-20.
7
Ensuring the safety of health information systems: using heuristics for patient safety.确保健康信息系统的安全:运用启发法保障患者安全。
Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:49-54. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.20966.
8
Impact of CPOE on doctor-nurse cooperation for the medication ordering and administration process.计算机化医师医嘱录入(CPOE)对医嘱开具及给药流程中医护合作的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):629-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.01.004. Epub 2005 Apr 14.
9
Technology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application.技术引发的错误与可用性:使用手持应用程序时可用性问题与处方错误之间的关系
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):519-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.01.003. Epub 2005 Apr 8.
10
Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.用于评估临床信息系统的认知与可用性工程方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2004 Feb;37(1):56-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003.