• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Human Factors for More Usable and Safer Health Information Technology: Where Are We Now and Where do We Go from Here?提升健康信息技术可用性与安全性的人为因素:我们现状如何,未来何去何从?
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):120-125. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-024.
2
Usability Methods for Ensuring Health Information Technology Safety: Evidence-Based Approaches. Contribution of the IMIA Working Group Health Informatics for Patient Safety.确保健康信息技术安全的可用性方法:循证方法。国际医学信息学会患者安全健康信息学工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:20-7.
3
From Usability Testing to Clinical Simulations: Bringing Context into the Design and Evaluation of Usable and Safe Health Information Technologies. Contribution of the IMIA Human Factors Engineering for Healthcare Informatics Working Group.从可用性测试到临床模拟:将情境融入可用且安全的健康信息技术的设计与评估。国际医学信息学协会医疗保健信息学人为因素工程工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:78-85.
4
Are We There Yet? Human Factors Knowledge and Health Information Technology - the Challenges of Implementation and Impact.我们到了吗?人为因素知识与健康信息技术——实施与影响的挑战
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):84-91. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-014. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
5
Effective Usability Engineering in Healthcare: A Vision of Usable and Safer Healthcare IT.医疗保健领域的有效可用性工程:关于可用且更安全的医疗信息技术的愿景。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1066-1069.
6
A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes.一个用于评估电子健康记录供应商以用户为中心的设计和可用性测试流程的框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e35-e39. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw092.
7
Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA.通过提高电子健康记录系统的可用性来增强患者安全和护理质量:AMIA 的建议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e2-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001458. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
8
Technology-induced errors: where do they come from and what can we do about them?技术导致的错误:它们从何而来,我们又能对此做些什么?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;194:20-6.
9
Integrating heuristic evaluation with cognitive walkthrough: development of a hybrid usability inspection method.将启发式评估与认知走查相结合:一种混合可用性检查方法的开发。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;208:221-5.
10
Exploring the relationship between usability and technology-induced error: unraveling a complex interaction.探索可用性与技术引发的错误之间的关系:解析复杂的相互作用。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;166:48-56.

引用本文的文献

1
Using human centred design and human factors to support a rapid health information technology patient safety response.运用以人为本的设计和人因工程学来支持快速的医疗卫生信息技术患者安全响应。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):1169. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13293-5.
2
Development of a Human Factors-Based Guideline to Support the Design, Evaluation, and Continuous Improvement of Clinical Decision Support.制定基于人为因素的指南,以支持临床决策支持的设计、评估和持续改进。
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 Nov 27;3(1):100182. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.11.003. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Development of a Web App to Enhance Physical Activity in People With Cystic Fibrosis: Co-Design and Acceptability Evaluation by Patients and Health Professionals.开发一款用于增强囊性纤维化患者身体活动的网络应用程序:患者与健康专业人员的协同设计及可接受性评估
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 30;8:e54322. doi: 10.2196/54322.
4
Novel Note Templates to Enhance Signal and Reduce Noise in Medical Documentation: Prospective Improvement Study.新型笔记模板以增强医学文档中的信号并减少噪声:前瞻性改进研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 12;7:e41223. doi: 10.2196/41223.
5
How Digital Systems Are Used in Swedish Home Care Nursing Practice: A Qualitative Interview Study to Identify Challenges and Opportunities.数字系统在瑞典居家护理护理实践中的使用情况:一项定性访谈研究,旨在确定挑战和机遇。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Aug 1;41(8):586-594. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001006.
6
Using COMPASS () Theory to Augment Implementation of Digital Health Solutions.运用 COMPASS()理论增强数字健康解决方案的实施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 10;19(12):7111. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127111.
7
Designing Formulae for Ranking Search Results: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.设计搜索结果排名公式:混合方法评估研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Mar 25;9(1):e30258. doi: 10.2196/30258.
8
Improving the Usability and Safety of Digital Health Systems: The Role of Predictive Human-Computer Interaction Modeling.提高数字健康系统的可用性和安全性:预测人机交互建模的作用。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 27;23(5):e25281. doi: 10.2196/25281.
9
Categorizing and understanding medication errors in hospital pharmacy in relation to human factors.对医院药房中与人为因素相关的用药错误进行分类和理解。
Saudi Pharm J. 2020 Dec;28(12):1674-1685. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
Application of human factors to improve usability of clinical decision support for diagnostic decision-making: a scenario-based simulation study.将人为因素应用于改善临床决策支持的可用性以用于诊断决策:基于场景的模拟研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Apr;29(4):329-340. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009857. Epub 2019 Nov 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical simulation: A method for development and evaluation of clinical information systems.临床模拟:一种临床信息系统开发与评估的方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Apr;54:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
2
Human Factors in the Large: Experiences from Denmark, Finland and Canada in Moving Towards Regional and National Evaluations of Health Information System Usability. Contribution of the IMIA Human Factors Working Group.大规模中的人为因素:丹麦、芬兰和加拿大在迈向健康信息系统可用性的区域和国家评估方面的经验。IMIA人为因素工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2014 Aug 15;9(1):67-81. doi: 10.15265/IY-2014-0023.
3
ONC issues guides for SAFER EHRs.美国国立癌症研究所发布更安全电子健康记录指南。
J AHIMA. 2014 Apr;85(4):50-2.
4
From Usability Testing to Clinical Simulations: Bringing Context into the Design and Evaluation of Usable and Safe Health Information Technologies. Contribution of the IMIA Human Factors Engineering for Healthcare Informatics Working Group.从可用性测试到临床模拟:将情境融入可用且安全的健康信息技术的设计与评估。国际医学信息学协会医疗保健信息学人为因素工程工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:78-85.
5
Usability Methods for Ensuring Health Information Technology Safety: Evidence-Based Approaches. Contribution of the IMIA Working Group Health Informatics for Patient Safety.确保健康信息技术安全的可用性方法:循证方法。国际医学信息学会患者安全健康信息学工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:20-7.
6
Use of clinical simulation for assessment in EHR-procurement: design of method.在电子健康记录采购中使用临床模拟进行评估:方法设计
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:576-80.
7
Seeking evidence to support usability principles for medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) functions.寻找证据以支持与药物相关的临床决策支持(CDS)功能的可用性原则。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:427-31.
8
The science of human factors: separating fact from fiction.人类因素科学:区分事实与虚构。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):802-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001450. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
9
Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA.通过提高电子健康记录系统的可用性来增强患者安全和护理质量:AMIA 的建议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e2-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001458. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
10
National efforts to improve health information system safety in Canada, the United States of America and England.加拿大、美利坚合众国和英国为改善卫生信息系统安全所做的国家努力。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):e149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

提升健康信息技术可用性与安全性的人为因素:我们现状如何,未来何去何从?

Human Factors for More Usable and Safer Health Information Technology: Where Are We Now and Where do We Go from Here?

作者信息

Kushniruk A, Nohr C, Borycki E

机构信息

Professor Andre Kushniruk, School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, B.C. V8W 2Y2, Canada, E-mail:

出版信息

Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):120-125. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-024.

DOI:10.15265/IY-2016-024
PMID:27830239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5171573/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

A wide range of human factors approaches have been developed and adapted to healthcare for detecting and mitigating negative unexpected consequences associated with technology in healthcare (i.e. technology-induced errors). However, greater knowledge and wider dissemination of human factors methods is needed to ensure more usable and safer health information technology (IT) systems.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reports on work done by the IMIA Human Factors Working Group and discusses some successful approaches that have been applied in using human factors to mitigate negative unintended consequences of health IT. The paper addresses challenges in bringing human factors approaches into mainstream health IT development.

RESULTS

A framework for bringing human factors into the improvement of health IT is described that involves a multi-layered systematic approach to detecting technology-induced errors at all stages of a IT system development life cycle (SDLC). Such an approach has been shown to be needed and can lead to reduced risks associated with the release of health IT systems into live use with mitigation of risks of negative unintended consequences.

CONCLUSION

Negative unintended consequences of the introduction of IT into healthcare (i.e. potential for technology-induced errors) continue to be reported. It is concluded that methods and approaches from the human factors and usability engineering literatures need to be more widely applied, both in the vendor community and in local and regional hospital and healthcare settings. This will require greater efforts at dissemination and knowledge translation, as well as greater interaction between the academic and vendor communities.

摘要

未标注

已经开发并改编了一系列人为因素方法用于医疗保健领域,以检测和减轻与医疗保健技术相关的负面意外后果(即技术引发的错误)。然而,需要更深入的了解和更广泛地传播人为因素方法,以确保健康信息技术(IT)系统更便于使用且更安全。

目的

本文报告了国际医学信息学协会人为因素工作组所做的工作,并讨论了一些成功的方法,这些方法已应用于利用人为因素减轻健康IT的负面意外后果。本文探讨了将人为因素方法引入主流健康IT开发所面临的挑战。

结果

描述了一个将人为因素纳入健康IT改进的框架,该框架涉及一种多层次的系统方法,用于在IT系统开发生命周期(SDLC)的各个阶段检测技术引发的错误。事实证明,这种方法是必要的,并且可以降低与健康IT系统投入实际使用相关的风险,同时减轻负面意外后果的风险。

结论

将IT引入医疗保健领域的负面意外后果(即技术引发错误的可能性)仍不断有报告。得出的结论是,人为因素和可用性工程文献中的方法和途径需要在供应商群体以及地方和区域医院及医疗保健机构中得到更广泛的应用。这将需要在传播和知识转化方面做出更大的努力,以及学术界和供应商群体之间加强互动。