Bouaud J, Lamy J-B
Yearb Med Inform. 2014 Aug 15;9(1):163-6. doi: 10.15265/IY-2014-0036.
To summarize recent research and propose a selection of best papers published in 2013 in the field of computer-based decision support in health care.
Two literature reviews were performed by the two section editors from bibliographic databases with a focus on clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) and computer provider order entry in order to select a list of candidate best papers to be peer-reviewed by external reviewers.
The full review process highlighted three papers, illustrating current trends in the domain of clinical decision support. The first trend is the development of theoretical approaches for CDSSs, and is exemplified by a paper proposing the integration of family histories and pedigrees in a CDSS. The second trend is illustrated by well-designed CDSSs, showing good theoretical performances and acceptance, while failing to show a clinical impact. An example is given with a paper reporting on scorecards aiming to reduce adverse drug events. The third trend is represented by research works that try to understand the limits of CDSS use, for instance by analyzing interactions between general practitioners, patients, and a CDSS.
CDSSs can achieve good theoretical results in terms of sensibility and specificity, as well as a good acceptance, but evaluations often fail to demonstrate a clinical impact. Future research is needed to better understand the causes of this observation and imagine new effective solutions for CDSS implementation.
总结近期研究,并推荐2013年发表在医疗保健领域基于计算机的决策支持方面的最佳论文选集。
两位栏目编辑从书目数据库进行了两项文献综述,重点关注临床决策支持系统(CDSS)和计算机医嘱录入,以便选出一系列候选最佳论文供外部评审人员进行同行评审。
全面的评审过程突出了三篇论文,展示了临床决策支持领域的当前趋势。第一个趋势是CDSS理论方法的发展,一篇提议将家族病史和谱系整合到CDSS中的论文就是例证。第二个趋势通过设计良好的CDSS得以体现,这些系统显示出良好的理论性能和可接受性,但未显示出临床影响。一篇关于旨在减少药物不良事件的记分卡的论文就是一个例子。第三个趋势由试图了解CDSS使用局限性的研究工作代表,例如通过分析全科医生、患者和CDSS之间的互动。
CDSS在敏感性和特异性方面可以取得良好的理论成果,并且具有良好的可接受性,但评估往往未能证明其临床影响。需要未来的研究来更好地理解这一现象的原因,并设想出CDSS实施的新有效解决方案。