• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Coordinated use of Health Level 7 standards to support clinical decision support: Case study with shared decision making and drug-drug interactions.协调使用卫生信息交换标准(HL7)以支持临床决策支持:共享决策制定与药物相互作用的案例研究
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Mar 21;162:104749. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104749.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Leveraging Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for Distributed Analyses in Clinical Research: Technical Implementation Report of the HELP Study.利用可互操作的电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行临床研究中的分布式分析:HELP研究的技术实施报告。
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jul 30;13:e68171. doi: 10.2196/68171.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Electronic Health Record and Semantic Issues Using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources: Systematic Mapping Review.电子健康记录与 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources 的语义问题:系统映射综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 30;26:e45209. doi: 10.2196/45209.
6
Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collected Via Web Applications and Mobile Apps Into a Nation-Wide COVID-19 Research Platform Using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources: Development Study.利用快速医疗互操作性资源将通过 Web 应用程序和移动应用程序收集的患者报告结局数据整合到一个全国性的 COVID-19 研究平台中:开发研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 27;26:e47846. doi: 10.2196/47846.
7
Assessment of 3 standards-based clinical decision support (CDS) tools in an academic electronic health record using Clinical Quality Language, CDS Hooks, and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources: a retrospective evaluation.使用临床质量语言、CDS挂钩和快速医疗保健互操作性资源,在学术电子健康记录中评估3种基于标准的临床决策支持(CDS)工具:一项回顾性评估。
JAMIA Open. 2025 Jul 30;8(4):ooaf085. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf085. eCollection 2025 Aug.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.审视技术如何支持肿瘤学会诊中的共同决策:定性主题分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 11;11:e70827. doi: 10.2196/70827.
10
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges to Reduce Alert Burden Using Current Decision Support Infrastructure in Two Commercial EHR Systems: Lessons Learned and Path Forward.利用两个商业电子健康记录系统中的现有决策支持基础设施减轻警报负担面临的挑战:经验教训与前进方向。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 May;16(3):575-582. doi: 10.1055/a-2546-5954. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
2
A scoping review of rule-based clinical decision support malfunctions.基于规则的临床决策支持故障的范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2405-2413. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae187.
3
Machine Learning-Enabled Clinical Information Systems Using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources Data Standards: Scoping Review.使用快速医疗保健互操作性资源数据标准的机器学习临床信息系统:范围审查
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Aug 24;11:e48297. doi: 10.2196/48297.
4
Smart Contract Authentication assisted GraphMap-Based HL7 FHIR architecture for interoperable e-healthcare system.用于可互操作电子医疗保健系统的基于智能合约认证辅助图形映射的HL7 FHIR架构。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 3;9(4):e15180. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15180. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Shared Decision-Making for Drug-Drug Interactions: Formative Evaluation of an Anticoagulant Drug Interaction.药物相互作用的共同决策:抗凝药物相互作用的形成性评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 19;6(10):e40018. doi: 10.2196/40018.
6
Conceptualizing clinical decision support as complex interventions: a meta-analysis of comparative effectiveness trials.将临床决策支持概念化为复杂干预措施:一项比较有效性试验的荟萃分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Sep 12;29(10):1744-1756. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac089.

本文引用的文献

1
A Shared Decision-making Tool for Drug Interactions Between Warfarin and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs: Design and Usability Study.华法林与非甾体抗炎药之间药物相互作用的共享决策工具:设计与可用性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Oct 26;8(4):e28618. doi: 10.2196/28618.
2
Contemporary clinical decision support standards using Health Level Seven International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources.使用健康信息交换标准HL7 快速医疗互操作性资源的当代临床决策支持标准。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 30;28(8):1796-1806. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab070.
3
Effects of Computerized Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes: Systematic Review.计算机化决策支持系统对从业者表现和患者结局的影响:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Aug 11;8(8):e17283. doi: 10.2196/17283.
4
Integrated displays to improve chronic disease management in ambulatory care: A SMART on FHIR application informed by mixed-methods user testing.整合式显示器以改善门诊慢性病管理:通过混合方法用户测试为依据的 SMART on FHIR 应用程序。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):1225-1234. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa099.
5
FHIR Lab Reports: using SMART on FHIR and CDS Hooks to increase the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic laboratory test results.FHIR实验室报告:利用FHIR上的SMART和临床决策支持挂钩来提高药物基因组学实验室检测结果的临床效用。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2020 May 30;2020:683-692. eCollection 2020.
6
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.临床决策支持系统概述:益处、风险及成功策略。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 6;3:17. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y. eCollection 2020.
7
Availability and usage of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) in office-based primary care settings in the USA.美国基层医疗门诊环境中临床决策支持系统(CDSSs)的可用性和使用情况。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Dec;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100015.
8
Association of an Electronic Health Record Add-on App for Neonatal Bilirubin Management With Physician Efficiency and Care Quality.电子病历附加应用程序对新生儿胆红素管理与医生效率和护理质量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915343. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15343.
9
Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Services to Detect Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Using Clinical Quality Language.使用临床质量语言实施临床决策支持服务以检测潜在药物相互作用
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:724-728. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190318.
10
Development and dissemination of clinical decision support across institutions: standardization and sharing of refugee health screening modules.跨机构的临床决策支持的开发和传播:难民健康筛查模块的标准化和共享。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1515-1524. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz124.

协调使用卫生信息交换标准(HL7)以支持临床决策支持:共享决策制定与药物相互作用的案例研究

Coordinated use of Health Level 7 standards to support clinical decision support: Case study with shared decision making and drug-drug interactions.

作者信息

Thiess Henrik, Del Fiol Guilherme, Malone Daniel C, Cornia Ryan, Sibilla Max, Rhodes Bryn, Boyce Richard D, Kawamoto Kensaku, Reese Thomas

机构信息

University of Heidelberg, Germany.

University of Utah, Department of Biomedical Informatics, United States.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2022 Mar 21;162:104749. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104749.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104749
PMID:35358893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9703934/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in interoperability standards, it remains challenging and often costly to share clinical decision support (CDS) across healthcare organizations. This is due in part to limited coordination among CDS components. To improve coordination of CDS components, Health Level 7 (HL7) has developed a suite of interoperability standards with Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) specification as a common information model. Evidence is needed to determine the feasibility of implementing these CDS components; therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the coordination of emerging HL7 standards with modular CDS architecture components.

METHODS

We used a modular, standards-based architecture consisting of four components: data, logic, services, and applications. The implementation use-case was an application to support shared decision making in the context of drug-drug interactions (DDInteract).

RESULTS

DDInteract uses FHIR as the data representation model, Clinical Quality Language for logic representation, CDS Hooks for the services layer, and Substitutable Medical Apps Reusable Technologies for application integration. DDInteract was first implemented in a sandbox environment and then in an electronic health record (Epic®) test environment. DDInteract can be integrated in clinical workflows through on-demand access from a menu or through CDS Hooks upon opening a patient's record or placing a medication order.

CONCLUSION

In the context of drug interactions, DDInteract is the first application to leverage a full stack of emerging interoperability standards for each component of modular CDS architecture. The demonstrated feasibility of interoperable components can be generalized to other modular CDS applications.

摘要

背景

尽管互操作性标准取得了进展,但在医疗保健组织之间共享临床决策支持(CDS)仍然具有挑战性,而且成本往往很高。这部分是由于CDS组件之间的协调有限。为了改善CDS组件的协调,卫生信息标准组织(HL7)已经开发了一套互操作性标准,以快速医疗互操作性资源(FHIR)规范作为通用信息模型。需要证据来确定实施这些CDS组件的可行性;因此,本研究的目的是调查新兴的HL7标准与模块化CDS架构组件之间的协调性。

方法

我们使用了一种基于标准的模块化架构,由四个组件组成:数据、逻辑、服务和应用程序。实施用例是一个在药物相互作用(DDInteract)背景下支持共享决策的应用程序。

结果

DDInteract使用FHIR作为数据表示模型,使用临床质量语言进行逻辑表示,使用CDS Hooks作为服务层,使用可替代医疗应用程序可重用技术进行应用程序集成。DDInteract首先在沙盒环境中实施,然后在电子健康记录(Epic®)测试环境中实施。DDInteract可以通过菜单按需访问或在打开患者记录或下达用药医嘱时通过CDS Hooks集成到临床工作流程中。

结论

在药物相互作用的背景下,DDInteract是第一个为模块化CDS架构的每个组件利用一整套新兴互操作性标准的应用程序。已证明的可互操作组件的可行性可以推广到其他模块化CDS应用程序。