• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于数字孪生在医学中应用的共识声明。

A consensus statement on the use of digital twins in medicine.

作者信息

Iqbal Jeffrey David, Krauthammer Michael, Witt Claudia M, Biller-Andorno Nikola, Christen Markus

机构信息

Digital Society Initiative, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 28;8(1):484. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01897-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01897-4
PMID:40721854
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12304465/
Abstract

Digital Health Technologies represent a marked shift from current medical technologies in use, the approach to health and healthcare and stakeholders engaged in healthcare delivery. What the digitalized future of medicine will look like and how it should be governed is unclear. A participatory process with interdisciplinary expert groups developed scenarios of Artificial Intelligence use in medicine and recommendations on their governance. The process included a patient-consumer focus group and the recommendations were validated by a representative population survey in Switzerland. Digital twins were identified as a pivotal innovation for personalized healthcare, with 62% of the Swiss population expressing interest, though 87% oppose mandatory use. Additionally, 75% view the state as responsible for ensuring necessary infrastructure. Digital twins are seen as an opportunity to support both the healthcare provider as well as patient-consumer directly in different modes of use and along functions, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.

摘要

数字健康技术代表了与当前正在使用的医疗技术、健康及医疗保健方式以及参与医疗服务提供的利益相关者相比的显著转变。医学的数字化未来会是什么样子以及应如何对其进行管理尚不清楚。一个由跨学科专家小组参与的过程制定了人工智能在医学中的应用场景及其管理建议。该过程包括一个患者 - 消费者焦点小组,并且这些建议在瑞士的一项代表性人口调查中得到了验证。数字孪生被确定为个性化医疗保健的关键创新,62%的瑞士人口表示感兴趣,尽管87%的人反对强制使用。此外,75%的人认为国家有责任确保必要的基础设施。数字孪生被视为一个机会,可在不同的使用模式以及预防、诊断、预后和治疗等功能方面直接支持医疗保健提供者和患者 - 消费者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6ce/12304465/ebfd78aecbba/41746_2025_1897_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6ce/12304465/d54c810b52ff/41746_2025_1897_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6ce/12304465/5286d0c264aa/41746_2025_1897_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6ce/12304465/51ca1a763f40/41746_2025_1897_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6ce/12304465/ebfd78aecbba/41746_2025_1897_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6ce/12304465/d54c810b52ff/41746_2025_1897_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6ce/12304465/5286d0c264aa/41746_2025_1897_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6ce/12304465/51ca1a763f40/41746_2025_1897_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6ce/12304465/ebfd78aecbba/41746_2025_1897_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A consensus statement on the use of digital twins in medicine.关于数字孪生在医学中应用的共识声明。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 28;8(1):484. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01897-4.
2
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
3
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
5
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Variation within and between digital pathology and light microscopy for the diagnosis of histopathology slides: blinded crossover comparison study.数字病理学与光学显微镜检查在组织病理学切片诊断中的内部及相互间差异:双盲交叉对比研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(30):1-75. doi: 10.3310/SPLK4325.
8
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.

本文引用的文献

1
Do patients prefer a human doctor, artificial intelligence, or a blend, and is this preference dependent on medical discipline? Empirical evidence and implications for medical practice.患者更喜欢人类医生、人工智能还是两者的结合,这种偏好是否取决于医学学科?来自实证研究的证据及其对医疗实践的启示。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1422177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1422177. eCollection 2024.
2
Public perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: ethical concerns and opportunities for patient-centered care.公众对医疗保健领域人工智能的看法:关注伦理问题,以实现以患者为中心的护理。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 22;25(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01066-4.
3
How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment.
ChatGPT在美国医师执照考试(USMLE)中的表现如何?大语言模型对医学教育和知识评估的影响。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Feb 8;9:e45312. doi: 10.2196/45312.
4
Towards personalized computational oncology: from spatial models of tumour spheroids, to organoids, to tissues.迈向个性化计算肿瘤学:从肿瘤球体的空间模型,到类器官,再到组织。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Jan;15(138). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0703.
5
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.基于深度神经网络的皮肤癌皮肤科医生级分类。
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118. doi: 10.1038/nature21056. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
6
Architecture of a minimal signaling pathway explains the T-cell response to a 1 million-fold variation in antigen affinity and dose.一条最小信号通路的架构解释了T细胞对抗原亲和力和剂量百万倍变化的反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 25;113(43):E6630-E6638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608820113. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
7
The Living Heart Project: A robust and integrative simulator for human heart function.活体心脏项目:一个用于模拟人体心脏功能的强大且综合的模拟器。
Eur J Mech A Solids. 2014 Nov;48:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2014.04.001.
8
A 2014 medical informatics perspective on clinical decision support systems: do we hit the ceiling of effectiveness?2014年医学信息学视角下的临床决策支持系统:我们是否达到了有效性的上限?
Yearb Med Inform. 2014 Aug 15;9(1):163-6. doi: 10.15265/IY-2014-0036.
9
A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype.全细胞计算模型从基因型预测表型。
Cell. 2012 Jul 20;150(2):389-401. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.044.
10
A report card on computer-assisted diagnosis--the grade: C.计算机辅助诊断的成绩单——成绩:C。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1824-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406233302512.