In recent years, immediate implant placement has become a common clinical therapeutic protocol representing an alternative to the classical delayed surgical protocol of implant placement. This protocol, however, has not been fully validated, either in terms of fully understanding the influence of implant placement on the socket-healing process or on the clinical outcomes. This narrative review evaluates the different experimental studies in humans and animals assessing the bone-healing dynamics of the socket after tooth extraction and the dimensional changes occurring at the socket bone walls. These experimental studies describe, in detail, the hard- and soft-tissue healing of implants placed into fresh extraction sockets, demonstrating that marked morphological changes of the alveolar ridge will occur, independently of the implant installation, thus demonstrating that postextraction bone loss is an inevitable biological process. This evidence has also been corroborated in clinical studies in humans, demonstrating the risk of significant peri-implant tissue loss, mainly in the areas of high esthetic demand. There is a lack of long-term evidence on the impact of this protocol on the preservation of the peri-implant tissues. In conclusion, despite the obvious advantages of this surgical protocol, it also has limitations and is more technically demanding than placing an implant into a healed crest. When selecting this protocol, clinicians should always consider: (a) the gingival biotype of the patient; (b) the thickness and integrity of the socket bony walls; (c) the implant selection as well as the adequate vertical and horizontal position of the implant; and (d) the ideal patient (a nonsmoker with good plaque control).