Grossman Daniel, Baum Sarah, Fuentes Liza, White Kari, Hopkins Kristine, Stevenson Amanda, Potter Joseph E
Texas Policy Evaluation Project, Austin, TX; Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA; Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Texas Policy Evaluation Project, Austin, TX; Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA.
Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
In 2013, Texas passed omnibus legislation restricting abortion services. Provisions restricting medical abortion, banning most procedures after 20 weeks and requiring physicians to have hospital-admitting privileges were enforced in November 2013; by September 2014, abortion facilities must meet the requirements of ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). We aimed to rapidly assess the change in abortion services after the first three provisions went into effect.
We requested information from all licensed Texas abortion facilities on abortions performed between November 2012 and April 2014, including the abortion method and gestational age (< 12 weeks vs. ≥ 12 weeks).
In May 2013, there were 41 facilities providing abortion in Texas; this decreased to 22 in November 2013. Both clinics closed in the Rio Grande Valley, and all but one closed in West Texas. Comparing November 2012-April 2013 to November 2013-April 2014, there was a 13% decrease in the abortion rate (from 12.9 to 11.2 abortions/1000 women age 15-44). Medical abortion decreased by 70%, from 28.1% of all abortions in the earlier period to 9.7% after November 2013 (p<0.001). Second-trimester abortion increased from 13.5% to 13.9% of all abortions (p<0.001). Only 22% of abortions were performed in the state's six ASCs.
The closure of clinics and restrictions on medical abortion in Texas appear to be associated with a decline in the in-state abortion rate and a marked decrease in the number of medical abortions.
Supply-side restrictions on abortion - especially restrictions on medical abortion - can have a profound impact on access to services. Access to abortion care will become even further restricted in Texas when the ASC requirement goes into effect in 2014.
2013年,得克萨斯州通过了全面立法,限制堕胎服务。限制药物流产、禁止20周后大多数堕胎程序以及要求医生具备医院准入特权的条款于2013年11月开始实施;到2014年9月,堕胎机构必须符合门诊手术中心(ASC)的要求。我们旨在快速评估前三项条款生效后堕胎服务的变化情况。
我们向得克萨斯州所有持牌堕胎机构索取了2012年11月至2014年4月期间堕胎情况的信息,包括堕胎方法和孕周(<12周与≥12周)。
2013年5月,得克萨斯州有41家机构提供堕胎服务;2013年11月降至22家。里奥格兰德河谷的两家诊所关闭,西德克萨斯除一家外的所有诊所均关闭。将2012年11月至2013年4月与2013年11月至2014年4月进行比较,堕胎率下降了13%(从每1000名15 - 44岁女性中有12.9例堕胎降至11.2例)。药物流产减少了70%,从早期所有堕胎的28.1%降至2013年11月后的9.7%(p<0.001)。中期堕胎从所有堕胎的13.5%增至13.9%(p<0.001)。该州六个门诊手术中心仅进行了22%的堕胎手术。
得克萨斯州诊所的关闭以及对药物流产的限制似乎与该州堕胎率下降和药物流产数量显著减少有关。
对堕胎的供应方限制——尤其是对药物流产的限制——会对服务可及性产生深远影响。当2014年门诊手术中心要求生效时,得克萨斯州的堕胎护理可及性将受到进一步限制。