• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需求的决定因素:美国寻求堕胎服务女性的方法选择与提供者偏好

Determinants of demand: method selection and provider preference among US women seeking abortion services.

作者信息

Shochet Tara, Trussell James

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2008 Jun;77(6):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.02.003
PMID:18477487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5515366/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication abortion has the potential to increase abortion availability, primarily through new provider networks; however, without a better understanding of how and why women make decisions regarding both their abortion method and their provider, expansion efforts may be misguided and valuable resources may be wasted.

STUDY DESIGN

We undertook an exploratory study to investigate method and provider preferences. Semistructured one-on-one interviews were conducted with 205 abortion clients at three family planning clinics.

RESULTS

Study participants greatly preferred the clinic setting for their abortion; the majority of women in the study would not have gone to their regular physician if they had been given the option. In addition, method choice trumps provider choice for the majority of women who would have preferred their regular provider. Participants who chose the aspiration procedure were more likely to have previous knowledge about the medication method. Travel time was not a predictor of preferring one's regular physician over the clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

Expanding provider networks via the private sector is unlikely to be a panacea. In addition to these efforts, more attention may need to be paid to addressing logistic barriers to access. Physicians offering abortion services need to let their patients know they offer such services prior to their patients' need for them. Questions remain regarding the information being circulated about medication abortion.

摘要

背景

药物流产有潜力提高堕胎的可及性,主要通过新的医疗服务提供者网络来实现;然而,如果不能更好地理解女性如何以及为何在堕胎方式和提供者方面做出决策,扩大服务的努力可能会被误导,宝贵的资源可能会被浪费。

研究设计

我们进行了一项探索性研究,以调查对堕胎方式和提供者的偏好。在三家计划生育诊所对205名堕胎女性进行了半结构化一对一访谈。

结果

研究参与者非常倾向于在诊所进行堕胎;如果有选择的话,研究中的大多数女性不会去找她们的常规医生。此外,对于大多数更倾向于找常规医疗服务提供者的女性来说,堕胎方式的选择比提供者的选择更重要。选择吸宫术的参与者更有可能事先了解药物流产方法。出行时间并不是女性更倾向于选择常规医生而非诊所的预测因素。

结论

通过私营部门扩大医疗服务提供者网络不太可能是万灵药。除了这些努力之外,可能还需要更多地关注解决获取服务的后勤障碍。提供堕胎服务的医生需要在患者有需求之前就让他们知道自己提供此类服务。关于药物流产所传播的信息仍存在疑问。

相似文献

1
Determinants of demand: method selection and provider preference among US women seeking abortion services.需求的决定因素:美国寻求堕胎服务女性的方法选择与提供者偏好
Contraception. 2008 Jun;77(6):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
2
Contraception and abortion in Romania.罗马尼亚的避孕与堕胎
Lancet. 1993 Apr 3;341(8849):875-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)93074-b.
3
Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment.药物流产与手术真空吸引术的比较:女性对治疗的偏好与可接受性
BMJ. 1993 Sep 18;307(6906):714-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6906.714.
4
"I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.“我将独自处理这件事”:对美国自主堕胎经历的定性探索。
Reprod Health. 2021 May 4;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01142-7.
5
Prevalence, attitudes and knowledge of misoprostol for self-induction of abortion in women presenting for abortion at Midwestern reproductive health clinics.在中西部生殖健康诊所进行堕胎的女性中,米索前列醇用于自行堕胎的流行率、态度和知识。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Dec;27(1):1571311. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2019.1571311.
6
Attitudes and practices of private medical providers towards family planning and abortion services in Nigeria.尼日利亚私立医疗服务提供者对计划生育和堕胎服务的态度与做法。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Mar;84(3):270-80. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00405.x.
7
Re. Determinants of demand: method selection and provider preference among US women seeking abortion services.关于需求的决定因素:美国寻求堕胎服务女性中的方法选择与提供者偏好
Contraception. 2008 Dec;78(6):513; author reply 513-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
8
Early abortion services in the United States: a provider survey.美国早期堕胎服务:一项提供者调查。
Contraception. 2003 Apr;67(4):287-94. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00512-7.
9
Women's and providers' experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: a qualitative study.通过远程医疗提供的药物流产的妇女和提供者的体验:一项定性研究。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 Mar-Apr;23(2):e117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
10
Attitudes and preferences toward the provision of medication abortion in an urban academic internal medicine practice.在城市学术内科实践中提供药物流产的态度和偏好。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):647-52. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1956-6. Epub 2012 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing preference for and use of medication abortion in Texas after policy changes in 2014 and 2018.比较 2014 年和 2018 年政策变化后德克萨斯州对药物流产的偏好和使用情况。
Contraception. 2023 Mar;119:109912. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
2
Access experiences and attitudes toward abortion among youth experiencing homelessness in the United States: A systematic review.美国无家可归青年对堕胎的获取体验和态度:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0252434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252434. eCollection 2021.
3
Medication or surgical abortion? An exploratory study of patient decision making on a popular social media platform.药物流产还是手术流产?对大众社交媒体平台上患者决策的探索性研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):344-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 19.
4
Experiences of women who travel for abortion: A mixed methods systematic review.女性跨境堕胎的经历:一项混合方法系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 9;14(4):e0209991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209991. eCollection 2019.
5
Adapting the Interpersonal Quality in Family Planning care scale to assess patient perspectives on abortion care.改编计划生育护理中的人际质量量表以评估患者对堕胎护理的看法。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Jan 21;3(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0089-7.
6
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Women Able to Obtain Medication Abortion Before and After Ohio's Law Requiring Use of the Food and Drug Administration Protocol.俄亥俄州要求遵循美国食品药品监督管理局规程的法律实施前后能够获得药物流产的女性的社会人口学特征。
Health Equity. 2018 Jul 1;2(1):122-130. doi: 10.1089/heq.2018.0002. eCollection 2018.
7
Quantity over quality-Findings from a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids on early abortion methods.数量胜于质量——早期堕胎方法患者决策辅助工具的系统评价和环境扫描结果。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):316-326. doi: 10.1111/hex.12617. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids.早期流产的医学方法与手术方法:患者决策辅助工具的系统评价和环境扫描方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 14;5(7):e007966. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007966.
9
Women's perspectives on termination service delivery in Vietnam: a cross-sectional survey in three provinces.越南终止妊娠服务提供中的女性观点:三省的横断面调查。
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Oct 30;6:927-33. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S72343. eCollection 2014.
10
Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas.德克萨斯州实施一项限制性法律后堕胎服务的变化。
Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.1994年和2001年美国意外怀孕率的差异。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Jun;38(2):90-6. doi: 10.1363/psrh.38.090.06.
2
Medication abortion and family physicians' scope of practice.药物流产与家庭医生的执业范围。
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005 Jul-Aug;18(4):304-6. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.18.4.304.
3
Abortion in the United States.美国的堕胎情况。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:501-12. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144351.
4
Multicenter trial of a simplified mifepristone medical abortion regimen.简化米非司酮药物流产方案的多中心试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;105(2):345-51. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152003.94320.59.
5
A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion.米非司酮后6至8小时与24小时服用米索前列醇用于流产的随机对照研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):851-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124271.23499.84.
6
The role of emergency contraception.紧急避孕的作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;190(4 Suppl):S30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.063.
7
Normalizing the exceptional: incorporating the "abortion pill" into mainstream medicine.使特殊情况正常化:将“堕胎药”纳入主流医学。
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jun;56(12):2353-66. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00240-x.
8
Convincing new providers to offer medical abortion: what will it take?说服新的医疗服务提供者提供药物流产:需要付出什么?
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;35(1):44-7. doi: 10.1363/3504403.
9
Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000.2000年美国的堕胎发生率及服务情况。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;35(1):6-15. doi: 10.1363/3500603.
10
Choice of and satisfaction with methods of medical and surgical abortion among U.S. clinic patients.美国诊所患者对药物流产和手术流产方法的选择及满意度
Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Sep-Oct;33(5):212-6.