Helder Meghana R K, Schaff Hartzell V, Dearani Joseph A, Li Zhuo, Stulak John M, Suri Rakesh M, Connolly Heidi M
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;148(3):1020-4; discussion 1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.046. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
The study objective was to evaluate patients with Marfan syndrome and mitral valve regurgitation undergoing valve repair or replacement and to compare them with patients undergoing repair for myxomatous mitral valve disease.
We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients with Marfan syndrome treated surgically between March 17, 1960, and September 12, 2011, for mitral regurgitation and performed a subanalysis of those with repairs compared with case-matched patients with myxomatous mitral valve disease who had repairs (March 14, 1995, to July 5, 2013).
Of 61 consecutive patients, 40 underwent mitral repair and 21 underwent mitral replacement (mean [standard deviation] age, 40 [18] vs 31 [19] years; P = .09). Concomitant aortic surgery was performed to a similar extent (repair, 45% [18/40] vs replacement, 43% [9/21]; P = .87). Ten-year survival was significantly better in patients with Marfan syndrome with mitral repair than in those with replacement (80% vs 41%; P = .01). Mitral reintervention did not differ between mitral repair and replacement (cumulative risk of reoperation, 27% vs 15%; P = .64). In the matched cohort, 10-year survival after repair was similar for patients with Marfan syndrome and myxomatous mitral disease (84% vs 78%; P = .63), as was cumulative risk of reoperation (17% vs 12%; P = .61).
Patients with Marfan syndrome and mitral regurgitation have better survival with repair than with replacement. Survival and risk of reoperation for patients with Marfan syndrome were similar to those for patients with myxomatous mitral disease. These results support the use of mitral valve repair in patients with Marfan syndrome and moderate or more mitral regurgitation, including those having composite replacement of the aortic root.
本研究旨在评估患有马凡综合征且伴有二尖瓣反流并接受瓣膜修复或置换的患者,并将其与因黏液瘤样二尖瓣疾病接受修复的患者进行比较。
我们回顾了1960年3月17日至2011年9月12日期间因二尖瓣反流接受手术治疗的连续性马凡综合征患者的病历,并对接受修复的患者与1995年3月14日至2013年7月5日期间接受修复的黏液瘤样二尖瓣疾病病例匹配患者进行了亚分析。
在61例连续性患者中,40例接受了二尖瓣修复,21例接受了二尖瓣置换(平均[标准差]年龄,40[18]岁对31[19]岁;P = 0.09)。同期进行主动脉手术的比例相似(修复,45%[18/40]对置换,43%[9/21];P = 0.87)。马凡综合征患者二尖瓣修复后的10年生存率显著高于置换患者(80%对41%;P = 0.01)。二尖瓣修复和置换后的二尖瓣再次干预无差异(再次手术的累积风险,27%对15%;P = 0.64)。在匹配队列中,马凡综合征患者和黏液瘤样二尖瓣疾病患者修复后的10年生存率相似(84%对78%;P = 0.63),再次手术的累积风险也相似(17%对12%;P = 0.61)。
患有马凡综合征且伴有二尖瓣反流的患者,修复后的生存率高于置换。马凡综合征患者的生存率和再次手术风险与黏液瘤样二尖瓣疾病患者相似。这些结果支持对患有马凡综合征且二尖瓣反流程度为中度或更严重的患者,包括那些进行主动脉根部复合置换的患者,采用二尖瓣修复术。