Suppr超能文献

主动脉根部置换手术中的中度二尖瓣反流:二尖瓣修复与不修复的比较。

Moderate mitral regurgitation in aortic root replacement surgery: comparing mitral repair with no mitral repair.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Mar;147(3):938-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.056. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients often present for aortic root replacement surgery with concomitant mitral valve pathology. Moderate mitral regurgitation is the point of clinical equipoise where the benefits of intervention compared with observation are currently unknown. This study compares outcomes in patients undergoing aortic root replacement surgery who did or did not receive a mitral valve repair for their preoperative moderate mitral regurgitation.

METHODS

A total of 1316 patients who underwent aortic root replacement surgery between 2000 and 2011 were evaluated, with 104 patients meeting the inclusion criteria by presenting with moderate preoperative mitral regurgitation. A total of 73 patients (70%) received no mitral intervention, and 31 patients (30%) received a mitral repair. Patients underwent preoperative, postoperative, and greater than 6-month follow-up echocardiograms. Average clinical follow-up was 6.5 years.

RESULTS

The mitral repair group had increased preoperative New York Heart Association III/IV and heart failure, longer crossclamp times, and more postoperative renal failure (P = .0003, P = .04, P < .0001, and P = .03, respectively). The improvement in mitral regurgitation was greater for the mitral repair group (-2.1 ± 0.3 vs -1.1 ± 0.8, P < .0001), and mitral regurgitation remained significantly lower on follow-up at 6 months or more (0.6 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.2, P = .002). A significantly greater percentage of patients undergoing mitral repair compared with patients with no repair had improvement of at least 1 grade in mitral regurgitation postoperatively (100% vs 70%, P = .001) and on follow-up at 6 months or more (90% vs 61%, P = .006). There was no difference in long-term survival, freedom from 2+ or greater mitral regurgitation, or mitral reinterventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral repair along with aortic root replacement has acceptable operative risk. Aortic root replacement surgery alone improved mitral regurgitation, but the addition of mitral repair further reduced mitral regurgitation, suggesting that repairing moderate mitral regurgitation should generally be considered along with aortic root replacement.

摘要

目的

患者常因主动脉根部置换手术而同时伴有二尖瓣病变。中度二尖瓣反流是临床平衡点,目前尚不清楚干预与观察相比的益处。本研究比较了行主动脉根部置换手术的患者中,术前中度二尖瓣反流行二尖瓣修复或不行二尖瓣修复的患者的结局。

方法

评估了 2000 年至 2011 年间接受主动脉根部置换手术的 1316 例患者,其中 104 例符合中度术前二尖瓣反流的纳入标准。共有 73 例(70%)患者未行二尖瓣干预,31 例(30%)患者行二尖瓣修复。患者接受术前、术后和随访超过 6 个月的超声心动图检查。平均临床随访时间为 6.5 年。

结果

二尖瓣修复组术前纽约心脏协会心功能分级 III/IV 级和心力衰竭发生率更高,体外循环时间更长,术后肾衰竭发生率更高(P=0.0003,P=0.04,P<0.0001,P=0.03)。二尖瓣修复组的二尖瓣反流改善程度更大(-2.1±0.3 比-1.1±0.8,P<0.0001),且术后 6 个月或更长时间随访时的二尖瓣反流仍显著较低(0.6±0.4 比 0.9±0.2,P=0.002)。与未行修复的患者相比,行二尖瓣修复的患者术后至少有 1 级改善的比例更高(100%比 70%,P=0.001),且在术后 6 个月或更长时间的随访中也更高(90%比 61%,P=0.006)。两组患者的长期生存率、2+或更严重的二尖瓣反流发生率或二尖瓣再干预率无差异。

结论

主动脉根部置换手术联合二尖瓣修复的手术风险可接受。单纯主动脉根部置换术可改善二尖瓣反流,但联合二尖瓣修复可进一步降低二尖瓣反流,表明应普遍考虑在主动脉根部置换术的同时修复中度二尖瓣反流。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验