• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体重指数对腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术长期随访结果的影响

Impact of body mass index on outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.

作者信息

Gözen Ali Serdar, Akin Yigit, Özden Ender, Ates Mutlu, Hruza Marcel, Rassweiler Jens

机构信息

Department of Urology, SLK Kliniken, University of Heidelberg , Heilbronn , Germany.

出版信息

Scand J Urol. 2015 Feb;49(1):70-6. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.920416. Epub 2014 Aug 18.

DOI:10.3109/21681805.2014.920416
PMID:25130508
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the functional and oncological results of patients who had undergone laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 1224 patients with follow-up data (>24 months) were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups according to BMI (kg/m(2)) as: group 1 (normal, BMI <25, n = 425), group 2 (overweight, 25 ≤ BMI <30, n = 594) and group 3 (obese, BMI ≥ 30, n = 205). Demographic, intraoperative and postoperative data with oncological outcomes were recorded. The impact of obesity on those parameters was evaluated and statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 63.8 ± 6.1 years and mean follow-up was 43.1 ± 25.1 months (mean ± SD). There were 425 (34.7%) patients in group 1, 594 (48.5%) in group 2 and 205 (16.8%) in group 3. Operation time, clinical stage and estimated blood loss were significantly higher in group 3 than in the other groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Bilateral nerve-sparing rate and bladder neck-sparing rate were significantly decreased in group 3 compared with the other groups (p = 0.001 and p < 0.038, respectively). Statistically significantly higher pathological stage, tumour volume, positive surgical margin and Gleason scores were determined in group 3 compared with the other groups (p = 0.023, p = 0.018, p = 0.009 and p = 0.028, respectively). There were similar urinary continence rates among the groups. The rate of penetration with or without medication was significantly lower in group 3 than in the other groups (p = 0.593 and p = 0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LRP seemed safe and effective in obese patients, with similar mean overall survival, cancer-specific survival, complication rates and continence rates to normal weight patients in the long term.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查体重指数(BMI)对接受腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)患者的功能和肿瘤学结果的影响。

材料与方法

总共纳入了1224例有随访数据(>24个月)的患者。根据BMI(kg/m²)将患者分为三组:第1组(正常,BMI<25,n = 425),第2组(超重,25≤BMI<30,n = 594)和第3组(肥胖,BMI≥30,n = 205)。记录人口统计学、术中及术后数据以及肿瘤学结果。评估肥胖对这些参数的影响并进行统计分析。

结果

平均年龄为63.8±6.1岁,平均随访时间为43.1±25.1个月(平均值±标准差)。第1组有425例(34.7%)患者,第2组有594例(48.5%)患者,第3组有205例(16.8%)患者。第3组的手术时间、临床分期和估计失血量显著高于其他组(分别为p<0.001、p = 0.001和p = 0.001)。与其他组相比,第3组的双侧神经保留率和膀胱颈保留率显著降低(分别为p = 0.001和p<0.038)。与其他组相比,第3组的病理分期、肿瘤体积、手术切缘阳性率和Gleason评分在统计学上显著更高(分别为p = 0.023、p = 0.018、p = 0.009和p = 0.028)。各组间尿失禁率相似。第3组无论有无药物辅助的阴茎勃起功能障碍发生率均显著低于其他组(分别为p = 0.593和p = 0.007)。

结论

LRP对肥胖患者似乎是安全有效的,从长期来看,其平均总生存率、癌症特异性生存率、并发症发生率和尿失禁率与正常体重患者相似。

相似文献

1
Impact of body mass index on outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.体重指数对腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术长期随访结果的影响
Scand J Urol. 2015 Feb;49(1):70-6. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.920416. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
2
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and body mass index: an assessment of 151 sequential cases.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与体重指数:151例连续病例的评估
J Urol. 2005 Feb;173(2):442-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000148865.89309.cb.
3
Impact of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on clinical T3 prostate cancer: experience of a single centre with long-term follow-up.
BJU Int. 2015 Jul;116(1):102-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.12710. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
4
Impact of body mass index on perioperative morbidity, oncological, and functional outcomes after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.BMI 对腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术围手术期发病率、肿瘤学和功能结局的影响。
Urology. 2012 Sep;80(3):576-84. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.066.
5
Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期肿瘤学和控尿效果:单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E985-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11279.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
6
Performance and functional outcome of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in relation to obesity: an assessment of 500 patients.肥胖与内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术的手术效果及功能转归:500例患者的评估
BJU Int. 2008 Sep;102(6):718-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07664.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
7
Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中深部静脉丛的选择性结扎与标准结扎:对控尿、失血及切缘状态的影响
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
8
Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.前列腺大小和体重指数对腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后围手术期发病率的影响。
J Urol. 2005 Feb;173(2):552-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000150101.95236.35.
9
Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of pure versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon.单一外科医生进行的单纯腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学及功能结果比较
Scand J Urol. 2013 Feb;47(1):10-8. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.696137. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
10
A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与单纯腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的直接比较:单机构经验
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.111. Epub 2007 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between body mass index and localized prostate cancer management and disease-specific quality of life.体重指数与局限性前列腺癌管理及疾病特异性生活质量之间的关联。
BJUI Compass. 2022 Nov 2;4(2):223-233. doi: 10.1002/bco2.197. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
The Institute of Urology, Peking University prostatectomy score: a simple preoperative classification of prostate cancer for predicting surgical difficulty and risk.北京大学泌尿外科研究所前列腺切除术评分:一种简单的前列腺癌术前分类方法,可预测手术难度和风险。
Asian J Androl. 2018 Nov-Dec;20(6):581-586. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_39_18.
3
Impact of Obesity on Long-Term Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy: A Meta-Analysis.
肥胖对根治性前列腺切除术后长期尿失禁的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 3;2018:8279523. doi: 10.1155/2018/8279523. eCollection 2018.
4
Combined bladder neck preservation and posterior musculofascial reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: effects on early and long term urinary continence recovery.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中联合膀胱颈保留和后肌筋膜重建:对早期和长期尿控恢复的影响。
BMC Urol. 2017 Dec 15;17(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0308-1.
5
Body mass index and mortality in prostate cancer patients: a dose-response meta-analysis.前列腺癌患者的体重指数与死亡率:一项剂量反应荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Jun;19(2):122-31. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2015.64. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
Optimizing the formation of vesicourethral anastomosis and reduction of procedure time. A two-year experience with a modified technique for endoscopic running vesicourethral anastomosis.优化膀胱尿道吻合的形成并缩短手术时间。一项关于改良内镜连续膀胱尿道吻合技术的两年经验。
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(3):296-301. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.617. Epub 2015 Sep 7.