Biswas Bivas, Shukla N K, Deo S V S, Agarwala Sandeep, Sharma D N, Vishnubhatla Sreenivas, Bakhshi Sameer
Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B. R. A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Nov;61(11):1925-31. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25095. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
Data on extraosseous Ewing sarcoma (EES) with uniform chemotherapy protocol are minimal. We aimed to examine this aspect in our patients, identify prognostic factors and compare the same with osseous Ewing sarcoma.
A single institutional data review of patients with EES treated between June 2003 and November 2011 with uniform chemotherapy and evaluated on intent-to-treat analysis was done.
Of 374 patients with Ewing sarcoma, 60 (16%) were EES with median age 16 years; 20 (33%) had metastases. After median follow-up of 25 months (range: 1.7-104.4), 5-year event free survival (EFS), OS, and local-control-rate were 47.1 ± 7.9%, 61.6 ± 7.8%, and 77.9 ± 8.6%, respectively for entire EES cohort. In multivariate analysis, hemoglobin ≤ 10 g/dl (P = 0.03), and white blood cell count (WBC) >11 × 10(9) /L (P = 0.009) predicted inferior EFS for the entire EES cohort. Low hemoglobin (P = 0.05) and high LDH (P = 0.01) predicted inferior OS for the entire EES cohort on multivariate analysis. As compared to the cohort of skeletal primary (n = 314), higher proportion of patients underwent surgery in the cohort of EES (P = .003); EFS (P = 0.004) and OS (P = 0.08) were superior for patients with EES than patients with skeletal Ewing sarcoma.
These data of EES suggests that low hemoglobin and high WBC count adversely affect EFS. Overall outcome was significantly better for EES than skeletal primary tumors.
关于采用统一化疗方案治疗骨外尤因肉瘤(EES)的数据极少。我们旨在研究我们的患者在这方面的情况,确定预后因素,并将其与骨尤因肉瘤进行比较。
对2003年6月至2011年11月期间接受统一化疗并按意向性分析进行评估的EES患者进行单机构数据回顾。
在374例尤因肉瘤患者中,60例(16%)为EES,中位年龄16岁;20例(33%)有转移。中位随访25个月(范围:1.7 - 104.4个月)后,整个EES队列的5年无事件生存率(EFS)、总生存率(OS)和局部控制率分别为47.1±7.9%、61.6±7.8%和77.9±8.6%。在多变量分析中,血红蛋白≤10 g/dl(P = 0.03)和白细胞计数(WBC)>11×10⁹/L(P = 0.009)预测整个EES队列的EFS较差。多变量分析显示,低血红蛋白(P = 0.05)和高乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)(P = 0.01)预测整个EES队列的OS较差。与骨骼原发性肿瘤队列(n = 314)相比,EES队列中接受手术的患者比例更高(P = 0.003);EES患者的EFS(P = 0.004)和OS(P = 0.08)优于骨骼尤因肉瘤患者。
这些EES数据表明,低血红蛋白和高白细胞计数对EFS有不利影响。EES的总体预后明显优于骨骼原发性肿瘤。