Savage Jeanne E, Slutske Wendy S, Martin Nicholas G
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Genetic Epidemiology Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Dec;28(4):1198-211. doi: 10.1037/a0037413. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
Individual differences in personality are likely to play an important role in explaining the propensity to gamble. One of the potential roadblocks to elucidating the relation between personality and gambling may be inadequately accounting for the diversity of gambling activities. The goal of the present study was to provide a comprehensive and nuanced portrait of the relation between personality and gambling by taking a multivariate approach to the co-use of multiple gambling activities and employing a broad inventory of potentially relevant personality dimensions. Participants were 4,669 individuals from a national Australian twin registry. Structured interviews including an extensive assessment of gambling behaviors were conducted, and personality questionnaires that included the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire, the Sensation Seeking Scale, and the Magical Ideation Scale were completed. A latent class analysis of past-year involvement in 10 different gambling activities was performed to classify the participants into 5 groups. Unique personality configurations characterized the 3 more gambling-involved latent classes: (a) low behavioral control in the context of high negative emotionality and magical thinking typified extensive, versatile gamblers at high risk of gambling problems; (b) average behavioral control in the context of high negative emotionality and magical thinking typified those who primarily gambled on non-strategic games of chance; (c) low behavioral control in the context of high positive emotionality and low magical ideation typified those who primarily gambled on strategic games of skill. This study illustrates the value of using a multivariate person-centered approach for characterizing the personality correlates of the multifaceted phenomenon that is gambling.
人格的个体差异可能在解释赌博倾向方面发挥重要作用。阐明人格与赌博之间关系的一个潜在障碍可能是对赌博活动的多样性考虑不足。本研究的目的是通过采用多变量方法来共同使用多种赌博活动,并采用一系列广泛的潜在相关人格维度,提供一幅关于人格与赌博关系的全面而细致入微的图景。参与者是来自澳大利亚全国双胞胎登记处的4669名个体。进行了结构化访谈,包括对赌博行为的广泛评估,并完成了包括多维人格问卷、感觉寻求量表和神奇观念量表在内的人格问卷。对过去一年参与10种不同赌博活动的情况进行了潜在类别分析,将参与者分为5组。独特的人格配置表征了3个与赌博关联更大的潜在类别:(a) 在高负面情绪和神奇思维背景下的低行为控制,典型地体现为有赌博问题高风险的广泛、多样的赌徒;(b) 在高负面情绪和神奇思维背景下的平均行为控制,典型地体现为主要在非策略性机会游戏上赌博的人;(c) 在高正面情绪和低神奇观念背景下的低行为控制,典型地体现为主要在策略性技能游戏上赌博的人。本研究说明了使用多变量以人为中心的方法来表征赌博这一多方面现象的人格相关性的价值。