Watanabe H, Kazama Re, Asai T, Kanaya F, Ishizaki H, Fukushima M, Okiji T
Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):153-62. doi: 10.2341/13-357-L. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
This study aimed to evaluate the ability of high-intensity light-emitting diode (LED) and other curing units to cure dual-cured resin cement through ceramic material.
A halogen curing unit (Jetlite 3000, Morita), a second-generation LED curing unit (Demi, Kerr), and two high-intensity LED curing units (PenCure 2000, Morita; Valo, Ultradent) were tested. Feldspathic ceramic plates (VITABLOCS Mark II, A3; Vita Zahnfabrik) with thicknesses of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mm were prepared. Dual-cured resin cement samples (Clearfil Esthetic Cement, Kuraray Noritake Dental) were irradiated directly or through one of the ceramic plates for different periods (5, 10, 15, or 20 seconds for the high-intensity LED units and 20, 40, 60, or 80 seconds for the others). The Knoop hardness test was used to determine the level of photopolymerization that had been induced in the resin cement. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's post-hoc test to identify test-control (maximum irradiation without a ceramic plate) differences for each curing unit (p<0.05).
For all curing units, the curing conditions had a statistically significant effect on the Knoop hardness numbers (KHNs) of the irradiated cement samples (p<0.001). In general, the KHN decreased with increasing plate thickness and increased as the irradiation period was extended. Jetlite 3000 achieved control-level KHN values only when the plate thickness was 1.0 mm. At a plate thickness ≥2.0 mm, the LED units (except for PenCure 2000 at 3.0 mm) were able to achieve control-level KHN values when the irradiation time was extended. At a plate thickness of 3.0 mm, irradiation for 20 seconds with the Valo or for 80 seconds with the Demi were the only methods that produced KHN values equivalent to those produced by direct irradiation.
Regardless of the type of curing unit used, indirect irradiation of dual-cured resin cement through a ceramic plate resulted in decreased KHN values compared with direct irradiation. When the irradiation period was extended, only the LED units were able to achieve similar KHN values to those observed under direct irradiation in the presence of plates ≥2.0-mm thick. High-intensity LED units require a shorter irradiation period than halogen and second-generation LED curing units to obtain KHN values similar to those observed during direct irradiation.
本研究旨在评估高强度发光二极管(LED)及其他固化设备透过陶瓷材料固化双固化树脂水门汀的能力。
测试了一台卤素固化设备(Jetlite 3000,森田公司)、一台第二代LED固化设备(Demi, Kerr公司)以及两台高强度LED固化设备(PenCure 2000,森田公司;Valo,Ultradent公司)。制备了厚度为1.0、2.0和3.0毫米的长石质陶瓷板(VITABLOCS Mark II,A3;维他齿科集团)。双固化树脂水门汀样本(Clearfil Esthetic Cement,可乐丽诺瑞特牙科公司)直接或透过其中一块陶瓷板照射不同时长(高强度LED设备照射5、10、15或20秒,其他设备照射20、40、60或80秒)。采用努氏硬度测试来确定树脂水门汀中引发的光聚合程度。通过单因素方差分析和Dunnett事后检验分析数据,以确定每个固化设备的测试-对照(无陶瓷板时的最大照射)差异(p<0.05)。
对于所有固化设备,固化条件对照射后的水门汀样本的努氏硬度值(KHNs)有统计学显著影响(p<0.001)。一般来说,努氏硬度值随板厚度增加而降低,随照射时长延长而增加。Jetlite 3000仅在板厚度为1.0毫米时达到对照水平的努氏硬度值。在板厚度≥2.0毫米时,当照射时间延长,LED设备(3.0毫米厚时的PenCure 2000除外)能够达到对照水平的努氏硬度值。在板厚度为3.0毫米时,用Valo照射20秒或用Demi照射80秒是产生与直接照射相当的努氏硬度值的唯一方法。
无论使用何种类型的固化设备,与直接照射相比,透过陶瓷板间接照射双固化树脂水门汀会导致努氏硬度值降低。当照射时长延长时,仅LED设备在存在≥2.0毫米厚的板时能够达到与直接照射时观察到的类似的努氏硬度值。与卤素和第二代LED固化设备相比,高强度LED设备获得与直接照射时观察到的类似的努氏硬度值所需的照射时间更短。