Suppr超能文献

不同固化时间和距离对使用高强度发光二极管光固化机聚合的纳米填料树脂基复合材料修复体微硬度的影响。

Effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity LED light curing units.

作者信息

Barakah Haifa

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Lecturer at Collage of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi Dent J. 2021 Dec;33(8):1035-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examined the effect of different distances and curing times on the microhardness (VHN) of nanofilled resin-based composite (RBC) restorations polymerized with high-intensity LED LCUs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five RBC specimens (2 mm thickness and 5 mm diameter) were fabricated from Tetric-N-Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent). Each of the 25 specimens was polymerized by means of one of three types of high-intensity LED LCUs: (B) Blue-Phase-G2 (polywave LED, Ivoclar Vivadent), (E) Elipar S10 (single-peak, 3 M ESPE), and (P) Planmica Lumion (single-peak, Mectron) at three different distances (0 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm) at 20 sec, 40 s, and 60 sec. A microhardness tester (NOVA, Innovatest, The Netherlands) was used to measure the VHN from the top and bottom surfaces. Data for VHN were analyzed using mixed ANOVA, followed by post hoc analyses with p-values < 0.05.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found in VHN between all three LED LCUs, where (B) specimens had the highest means, followed by (E) and (P). Bottom surface VHN values were reduced significantly (p < 0.05) compared to top surface values in all LCU types. With increasing distances up to 2 mm and 4 mm, VHN values with (E) and (P) were significantly reduced on the top and bottom surfaces (p < 0.05). When the curing times were increased for 40 and 60 sec, the VHN values were significantly improved (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, increasing the distance with (B) did not significantly reduce the VHN. Moreover, increasing the curing times did not significantly improve the VHN of the bottom surfaces.

CONCLUSION

High-intensity LCUs have variable effects on the surface (top/bottom) hardness of Tetric-N-Ceram nanofilled RBC restoration. With increasing distance, VHN was reduced; therefore, compensation with more curing time (2 mm/40 sec and 4 mm/60 sec) is highly recommended with Elipar S10 and Planmica Lumion LCUs to improve the material surface hardness.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了不同距离和固化时间对采用高强度发光二极管光固化灯聚合的纳米填料树脂基复合材料(RBC)修复体显微硬度(维氏硬度,VHN)的影响。

材料与方法

用Tetric-N-Ceram(义获嘉伟瓦登特公司)制作75个RBC试件(厚度2mm,直径5mm)。25个试件中的每一个通过三种类型的高强度发光二极管光固化灯之一进行聚合:(B)Blue-Phase-G2(多波发光二极管,义获嘉伟瓦登特公司)、(E)Elipar S10(单峰,3M ESPE公司)和(P)Planmica Lumion(单峰,美创公司),在三个不同距离(0mm、2mm和4mm)下分别固化20秒、4秒和60秒。使用显微硬度测试仪(NOVA,Innovatest公司,荷兰)从顶面和底面测量维氏硬度。对维氏硬度数据采用混合方差分析进行分析,随后进行p值<0.05的事后分析。

结果

在所有三种发光二极管光固化灯之间,维氏硬度存在显著差异,其中(B)组试件的平均值最高,其次是(E)组和(P)组。在所有光固化灯类型中,底面的维氏硬度值与顶面相比显著降低(p < .05)。随着距离增加到2mm和4mm,(E)组和(P)组在顶面和底面的维氏硬度值显著降低(p < .05)。当固化时间增加到40秒和60秒时,维氏硬度值显著提高(p < .05)。同时,(B)组增加距离并未显著降低维氏硬度。此外,增加固化时间并未显著提高底面的维氏硬度。

结论

高强度光固化灯对Tetric-N-Ceram纳米填料RBC修复体的表面(顶面/底面)硬度有不同影响。随着距离增加,维氏硬度降低;因此,强烈建议使用Elipar S10和Planmica Lumion光固化灯时,通过增加更多固化时间(2mm/40秒和4mm/60秒)来提高材料表面硬度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/655b/8665174/361924412334/gr1.jpg

相似文献

4
Curing efficiency of various resin-based materials polymerized through different ceramic thicknesses and curing time.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Sep;3(3):126-31. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.3.126. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
5
Influence of the distance of the curing light source and composite shade on hardness of two composites.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Dec;15(6):486-91. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000600006.
6
Effect of four different mono and multi-wave light-curing units on the Knoop hardness of veneer resin composites.
Dent Mater. 2024 Jan;40(1):80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.019. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Light curing in dentistry and clinical implications: a literature review.
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug 28;31(suppl 1):e61. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0061.
3
Influence of Emission Spectrum and Irradiance on Light Curing of Resin-Based Composites.
Oper Dent. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):537-547. doi: 10.2341/16-349-L. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
4
Light-curing units used in dentistry: factors associated with heat development-potential risk for patients.
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1687-1696. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1962-5. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
5
Influence of physical assessment of different light-curing units on irradiance and composite microhardness top/bottom ratio.
Odontology. 2016 Sep;104(3):298-304. doi: 10.1007/s10266-015-0229-y. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
6
Effect of temperature, curing time, and filler composition on surface microhardness of composite resins.
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):114-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.153071.
7
Understanding light curing, Part I. Delivering predictable and successful restorations.
Dent Today. 2014 May;33(5):114, 116, 118 passim; quiz 121.
9
Assessing the irradiance delivered from light-curing units in private dental offices in Jordan.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Aug;144(8):922-7. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0210.
10
A brief history of LED photopolymerization.
Dent Mater. 2013 Jun;29(6):605-17. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验