• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙髓病学中根尖负压冲洗技术根源的历史视角。

Historical perspectives on the roots of the apical negative pressure irrigation technique in endodontics.

作者信息

Gutmann James L, Zehnder Matthias, Levermann Vivian Manjarres

出版信息

J Hist Dent. 2014 Spring;62(1):32-40.

PMID:25137828
Abstract

The removal of the infectious process caused by an abscess in the periapical tissues was a challenge to dentists in the early part of the 20th century. While they recognized the need to debride the periapical tissues, the process was slow, tedious, and often fraught with failure that resulted in tooth extraction. However, with some creative ingenuity, an irrigation-suction apparatus was developed in the 1930s that enabled rapid and thorough debridement. This appliance went through multiple developmental permutations and was successful in achieving the desired goal. Interestingly, while the purpose of this device was a controlled periapical debridement through the root canal, and not necessarily a focus on a cleaning of the intricacies of the root canal system, the basic concept purported was similar to contemporary approaches used in root canal debridement today.

摘要

在20世纪初,去除根尖周组织脓肿引起的感染过程对牙医来说是一项挑战。虽然他们认识到需要对根尖周组织进行清创,但这个过程缓慢、繁琐,而且常常充满失败,最终导致拔牙。然而,凭借一些创造性的智慧,20世纪30年代开发了一种冲洗-抽吸装置,能够实现快速彻底的清创。该装置经历了多次改进,成功实现了预期目标。有趣的是,虽然该装置的目的是通过根管进行可控的根尖周清创,而不一定专注于清洁根管系统的复杂结构,但其基本理念与当今根管清创中使用的现代方法相似。

相似文献

1
Historical perspectives on the roots of the apical negative pressure irrigation technique in endodontics.牙髓病学中根尖负压冲洗技术根源的历史视角。
J Hist Dent. 2014 Spring;62(1):32-40.
2
Canal and isthmus debridement efficacy of the VPro EndoSafe negative-pressure irrigation technique.VPro EndoSafe 负压冲洗技术的管腔和峡部清创效果。
J Endod. 2012 Dec;38(12):1631-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
3
[Developments in dentistry in the twentieth century 8. Endodontics].
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2000 Oct;107(10):419-24.
4
Root canal debridement using manual dynamic agitation or the EndoVac for final irrigation in a closed system and an open system.采用手动动态搅拌或 EndoVac 对根管进行清创,在封闭系统和开放系统中进行最终冲洗。
Int Endod J. 2010 Nov;43(11):1001-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01755.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
5
Revascularization and periapical repair after endodontic treatment using apical negative pressure irrigation versus conventional irrigation plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing in dogs' teeth with apical periodontitis.在患有根尖周炎的犬牙中,使用根尖负压冲洗与传统冲洗加三联抗生素根管内封药进行根管治疗后的血管再生和根尖周修复。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 May;109(5):779-87. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.046.
6
Biologic aspects of endodontics part III. periapical tissue reactions to root canal instrumentation. 1968.牙髓病学的生物学方面 第三部分。根尖周组织对根管预备的反应。1968年。
J Endod. 2004 Jul;30(7):491-9; discussion 489-90. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200407000-00008.
7
[Changes in the therapy of pulpal diseases and periapical lesions according to the articles published in the journal Fogorvosi Szemle during the past 100 years (1908-2008)].
Fogorv Sz. 2008 Aug;101(4):127-36.
8
Root canal irrigation--a historical perspective.根管冲洗——历史视角
J Hist Dent. 2004 Jul;52(2):61-5.
9
Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of a new apical negative pressure irrigating system with conventional irrigation needles in the root canals.新型根尖负压冲洗系统与传统冲洗针在根管内冲洗效果的比较
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.050.
10
Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.使用自调式锉时乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和MTAD去除碎屑及玷污层的效果
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.038. Epub 2011 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Chemical Debridement and Irrigant Activation on Endodontic Treatment Outcomes: An Updated Overview.化学清创和冲洗液激活对根管治疗效果的影响:最新综述。
Cureus. 2022 Jan 23;14(1):e21525. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21525. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Nanosilver Solution, Sodium Hypochlorite and Normal Saline in Root Canal Irrigation of Primary Teeth.纳米银溶液、次氯酸钠和生理盐水在乳牙根管冲洗中抗菌效果的评估
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S227-S232. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_95_18.
3
A scanning electron microscope evaluation of efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and in smear layer removal in root canals with the use of modified evacuation system: An study.
使用改良抽气系统对根管内次氯酸钠去除玷污层效果的扫描电子显微镜评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jul-Aug;21(4):401-407. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_373_16.